The Politics of Sustainable Development: A Subsistence View (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Political Economy of Ecology: Prospects for Transforming the World Economy at Rio Plus 20
Global Policy
This article assesses the prospects for advancing to a green economy at Rio Plus 20 through the perspective of international political economy writings on economic transformations and regime governance. In order to achieve robust investment in revolutionary new technologies a clear international political project is required that provides a common purpose, clear regulatory and legal rules, and formal organisational efforts for resource mobilisation, compensation of losers, and enforcement. It concludes with an appraisal of efforts underway to create the political foundation for a green economy, suggesting the creation of a new international organization for green technology innovation, and assigning the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to environmental science assessment. The next act in the slow transition to a more sustainable world will occur next year, at the UN Conference on Sus-tainable Development (UNCSD), to be held in Rio de Janeiro in June 2012 (Rio Plus 20). So...
Politics of Sustainable Development
Keynote address to International Society of Environmental Economics, Rio de Janeiro, 19 June 2012, 2012
This address was about how the clash of environment and development concerns played out in the Brundtland Commission and the 1992 Rio Conference.The author was personally involved with this quite intimately as the Senior Economic Adviser to the Brundtland Commission, as the Deputy Secretary General of the Rio Summit of 1992, as the UN Under Secretary General in charge of the Commission on Sustainable Development and as the Secretary General of the World Summit on Sustainable Development of 2002.I The address however limits itself to the Brundtland Commission and the 1992 Rio meeting leaving the later history for another occasion in the belief that the both the Brundtland report and the outcome of the Rio Conference have had a longer a deeper impact than almost any other exercise of a similar nature
Rio Plus Ten: politics, poverty and the environment
Political Geography, 2004
An increasingly neoliberal world political economy not only necessitates a change in the way that we look at the politics surrounding the issues of poverty and the environment, but at the relationship between the two. As Middleton and O'Keefe suggest, the two are fundamentally interrelated. The authors critically examine agreements reached during the United Nations' World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg during 2002, in relation to those reached during the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development known as UNCED or Rio, held in Rio de Janeiro during 1992. As the authors suggest, progress made toward fulfilling goals reached during UNCED, in combination with new mandates promulgated during the WSSD ten years later, indicate that in a world political economy dominated by hegemonic and increasingly neoliberal modes of governance, this connection between poverty and environment is being ignored. In choosing to ignore this connection, we fail to address the real cause of bothdcapitalism. In the first chapter, entitled ''Origins,'' Middleton and O'Keefe summarize the results of the Rio summit as ''.a supine surrender to the agendas of neoliberal capital.'' (p. 9) resulting in an effort to politicize environmental issues without addressing the fundamental causes of poverty and environmental degradation. ''Sustainable'' development was the focus of UNCED, and subsequently WSSD. However, as the authors accede, the term is ideological and therefore prone to various interpretations. Related to this, Harvey (1996: p. 148) suggests that the term ''sustainable'' incorporates capitalist values because ''.it is very hard to be in favor of 'unsustainable' practices, so the term sticks as positive reinforcement of policies and politics by giving them the aura of being environmentally sensitive.'' The authors go on to suggest that invoking the violation of human rights in response to poverty and environmental degradation ignores the social aspect of such atrocities. The danger of using such terms without qualification lies in the acceptance of ''.that fragmentation of social consciousness, of social space, which lies at the core of capital's ideology'' (p. 22). Chapter 2, ''What did they agree?'' attempts to summarize the agreements reached during the WSSD. Despite the fact that the summit's outcome is highly suspect, the authors correctly point out that in the Declaration of Sustainable Development, the drastic reduction of persons living in extreme poverty is a central issue in alleviating environmental concerns. This chapter
Sustainable Development and Policies or Strategies Concerning Resources
2015
Since the 1990s the term (and underlying concept ) of sustainable development has become the aspect arising most often in discussions regarding the Earth’s fate, the management of natural resources, energy policy, the safeguarding of food security and places to live, and so on. However, ideas on the accomplishment of sustainable development assumptions have first and foremost allowed for development and strengthening of all those ecological movements able to put political pressure on the governments of different countries, with a view to their devising and implementing policy on environmental protection, as well as the instrumentation allowing effective control over the exploitation of natural resources. Analyses concerning the structure and dynamics of contemporary use of natural resources for economic purposes which came into existence in time for the Rio “Earth Summit” (i.e., in the early 1990s) made it clear that the prevention of excessive change in the natural environment – an...
This article explores how Mozambique's green economy has been produced through the intersection of global ideas about green development, regional economic development dynamics, and local debates and political pressures around extraction and conservation. Mozambique's green economy aims to compress many of its current challenges into a seemingly attractive and compelling agenda. The green economy discourse has produced a new relationship between the conservation and extractives sector, characterized by 'green' financing and offsetting measures intended to handle (at least on paper) the contradictions between extractives-led growth and sustainable development. However, the green economy vision has also provided specific actors with ways to contest extraction. The article provides a lens onto the production of green economy policies and institutions in Mozambique, the way the policy combines neoliberal and non-neoliberal political ideas, and how green economy ideas are played out in the situated politics of debates over conservation and extraction. I consider how 'the' green economy is reworked through tracing a particular case – the recent debates over whether a large coal port should be built in the Ponta do Ouro Marine Reserve. This foregrounds the multiple and often ambiguous uses of green economy discourses to pursue different, and sometimes contradictory agendas. The article contributes new empirical information on the roll-out of green economies in a developing country context, while also seeking to expand current political ecology literature on neoliberalism and green economies more generally. Cet article explore la manière dont l' économie verte du Mozambique a été produite, à la croisée des idées mondiales sur le développement vert, des dynamiques régionales de développement économique, des débats locaux, et des pressions politiques autour des industries extractives et de la conservation de la nature. L'économie verte du Mozambique vise à condenser nombre de ses défis actuels en un programme d'apparence attrayant et convainquant. Le discours sur l'économie verte a créé une nouvelle relation entre le secteur de la conservation et les industries extractives, celui-ci est caractérisé par des mesures de financement et de compensation « vertes » destinées à solutionner (au moins en principle) les contradictions entre la croissance économique poussée par les industries extractives et le développement durable. Cependant, l'économie verte a également fourni à des acteurs spécifiques des moyens de contester les industries extractives. L'article fournit une nouvelle perspective sur la production des politiques et des institutions de l'économie verte au Mozambique, la manière dont ces politiques combinent des idées politiques néolibérales et non néolibérales, et la manière dont les idées de l'économie verte sont utilisées dans la politique des débats sur la conservation et les industries extractives. J'étudie la façon dont l'économie verte est retravaillée en retraçant l'histoire d'un cas en particulier: les récents débats sur la question de savoir si un grand port charbonnier devrait être construit dans la réserve marine de Ponta do Ouro. Ces débats mettent en exergue l'utilisation multiple et souvent ambiguë des discours sur l'économie verte pour poursuivre des programmes différents et parfois contradictoires. L'article apporte de nouvelles informations empiriques sur le déploiement des économies vertes dans le contexte de pays en développement, tout en cherchant également à élargir le corpus de la littérature en écologie politique sur le néolibéralisme et les économies vertes en général. Este artigo explora como a economia verde de Moçambique foi produzida através da interseção de ideias globais sobre desenvolvimento verde, dinâmicas de desenvolvimento econômico regional e debates locais e pressões políticas em torno da extração e conservação. A economia verde de Moçambique pretende reduzir muitos dos seus desafios atuais a uma agenda aparentemente atrativa. O discurso da economia verde produziu uma nova relação entre o setor de conservação e extrativismo, caracterizado pelo financiamento "verde" e pela compensação de medidas destinadas a lidar (pelo menos no papel) com as contradições entre o crescimento extrativista e o desenvolvimento sustentável. No entanto, a visão da economia verde também forneceu a certos atores maneiras de contestar a extração. O artigo analisa a produção de políticas e instituições de economia verde em Moçambique, a forma como a política combina ideias neoliberais e não-neoliberais, e como as ideias da economia verde se desenrolam na política dos debates sobre conservação e extração. Eu examino o modo como a 'economia verde é reconstruída através do estudo de um caso particular-os recentes debates sobre a construção de um grande porto de carvão na Reserva Marinha da Ponta do Ouro. A questão evidencia os usos múltiplos e muitas vezes ambíguos dos discursos sobre economia verde que podem fundamentar agendas diferentes e às vezes contraditórias. O artigo contribui para a geração de um conhecimento empiríco novo sobre a expansão das economias verdes no contexto de um país em desenvolvimento, enquanto colabora para o aprofundamento da literatura sobre ecologia política sobre o neoliberalismo e as economias verdes.
The Political Economy of Sustainable Development: The Governance Perspective
2017
According to the authors, this book aims to establish the following: (1) what is right and wrong with the policy instruments for sustainable development; and (2) what is the best model to advance sustainable development. In particular, they focus on the comparison and evaluation of various policy measures on forest issues: the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) included in the Kyoto Protocol; Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and the Role of Conservation, Sustainable Management of Forests and Enhancement of Forest Carbon Stocks in Developing Countries (REDD+) [Post COP15] proposed by Papua New Guinea and Costa Rica in COP 13 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC); forest certifications-the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC); the law enforcement system against illegally logged timbers-Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) in the EU; and policy measures for biodiversity-Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) and the Biodiversity Offset Mechanism (BOM) proposed in the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) framework. In the global forest issue field, negotiations on the adoption of a legally binding treaty on global forest management had reached a deadlock, and in 1992 a non-legally binding declaration of forest principles was agreed at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). After that, diverse policy measures began in various contexts, and a "wide range of institutions that share a number of commonalities coexist, but at times these can function within a series of 'silos.'" (p. 2). Thus the intention of this volume and the policy measures it analyzes and compares seem very sympathetic with many experts in forest issues. In Chapter 1, the authors take up two policy measures, the CDM and REDD+, both of which are UNFCCC strategies. The CDM is one of the Kyoto mechanisms in the Kyoto Protocol, whereby developed countries could use the credit accruing from their emissions reduction projects in developing countries in the commitment period 2008-12. In 2013, there were over 7,000 projects, and the amount of credits issued equated to 1.2 billion tons of carbon. But the authors state that "the ability to which the CDM can both reduce GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions and deliver sustainable development has been questioned" (p. 28). The authors cite several reasons for this. First, the focus on project-based reductions rather than larger programs of technological transformation by developing countries has not lowered transaction costs or created
Caminhos de Diálogo , 2019
Longitudinal scientific evidence proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the problem of climate change is reaching a point of no return, upon which Earthly and human survival depends. The major contributors of climate change include industry, transportation, agriculture, and consumers, over which corporate globalization controls, which consume fossil fuels, such as oil, coal, and gas that produce greenhouse gases. Climate change impacts access to clean water, human health, forests, coastal areas, biodiversity, and agriculture. Our tasks ahead include: 1) exposing and opposing flawed economic, political, social, cultural, and security models that destroy nature, cause mal-development, and widening the gap between the rich and the poor and 2) proposing new cooperative models that put sustainability and equality-nature and people-first, especially the poor and the oppressed, before profits.