A new paradigm of development as a modern challenge in agriculture (original) (raw)
Related papers
Challenges for Sustainable Development of Agricultural Holdings
Economic and Environmental Studies, 2016
Agricultural holdings have a very important role for the sustainable socio-economic development. Contemporary, the farms` activity is mainly determined by the market mechanism. Market imposes rules on agricultural holdings` functioning, on both the type and the scale of agricultural activities, agricultural production mode, as well as the sale conditions. The market mechanism forces the agricultural holdings` orientation on the economic objective achievement, aside from the agricultural production externalities. Those externalities are not the market transaction subject and are not a part of farmers` economic account. Agricultural production externalities, however, are the subject of increasing society` interests. Those interests particularly relate to natural environment protection and food supply. Referring to the above, there is a challenge to meet the requirements of a market, as well society. In order to meet the various agricultural holdings` challenges, there is a need to tak...
Dialnet Sustainable Agricultural Development Paradigm Formatio 8810187
REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA. 3ª época. Año 14 N° 39, 2023, 2023
The purpose of the article is to study the management experience of sustainable development of agriculture in the context of the paradigm of industrialized countries. To achieve the goal, general scientific and special-scientific methods of cognition were used, in particular, dialectical, formal-logical, analysis and synthesis, system-structural. This study analyzes the problems of "deep reform choice", which is the goal of creating an environmentally friendly society. The conditions under which agroecology restores and maintains the natural fertility of the land and contributes to the conservation of biodiversity, conserves soil and water resources, contributes to the achievement of high yields in the long term and opposes the use of agrochemicals are clarified. The management experience of industrialized countries (China, Japan, Malaysia), which, by developing agroecology, reproduce the natural flows of closed material cycles, resist emissions into the atmosphere, provide reliable access to land, water resources, information, credit and markets, advocates for a revision is being studied and generalizes legislation on property rights and support for farmers, investments in local infrastructure and agricultural products. KEYWORDS: Agriculture, agroecology, sustainable development, ecopolis, regenerative economy
Considerations on a land intrinsic productivity and its determinants in a sustainable agriculture
2015
The paper reviews the concept of sustainable development, indicating its various dimensions. Natural environment in developed countries became almost entirely anthropogenic. Under such conditions, the way of using natural resources has to change as well. It is forced by the new needs and priorities described above, i.e. a demand for an assurance concerning renewability of natural resources as well as pro-social and pro-environmental criteria of the resources allocation. The fundamental objective of the paper is an attempt at elaboration of the new land rent concept and fi nd the answer to the question: Does a land need capital stimulus to be productive in a sustainable development? Authors formulated the hypothesis: the reason for the land rent to occur are intrinsic land utilities which in the commodity money economy cause the expected productivity of capital factor in agriculture to be higher than in its market environment. Therefore, the value of land rent is determined by a posi...
The difficult relationship between Agricultural Policy, Incorne, Labour and Sustainable Developrnent
2005
This paper analyses the impact of some policy schemes, in the current frame work ofCAP, on returns, labour and sustainable development oftypical cr~p ping and li ve stock farming systems in the south of Portugal. Three scenanos have been worked out: in the first one, the current expectations will be main tained until 2006. In the second, the payments decoupled from production will give the farmer the exact amount he is receiving now. Finally, the third sce nario considers the decoupled payments on the basis ofthe labour expenditure of the farm . A mathematical programming model, combined with the Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator (EPIC) Cropping Systems model is used to de termine the impact degrees according to the system and scheme scenarios e valuated. Economie results (net margin) and environmental results (nitrate leaching, soil erosion, and biodiversity changes) are obtained for each system and scenario. Results point out a significant adjustment of production plans...
Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe - HAL - Université Paris Descartes, 2004
In Europe, an increasingly great part of the public subsidies for the food production are transferred towards the production of goods and environmental services. Today, farmers hesitate, on one hand, to search for the technical and economical performance which is the paradigme of their professional activities since 1960 or, on the other hand, to take into account enviromental concerns that are imposed since the middle 80's. Is it then possible for the farmers to still work according to the paradigm of the producer of agri-food goods and how do they react towards the ecologisation of their activities? In the paper, we will see which difficulties and sources of tension induces one aspect of the environmental concerns-the maintenance of the landscape-in the daily professional practices of the farmers. We will see that the professional identity of the farmers is deeply questionned by these changes (subsitution of strictly "agricultural issues" by more general concerns as "rural issues", effacement of the farmer to the profit of the "ecologized" peasant…). The topic of the landscape reveals social strains between farmers. It also raises the question of the legitimacy of the farmers to define the sense of their activities by themselves. We will see finally that the environmental orientations systematically do not open new prospects for all the farmers ; they sometimes contribute to reinforce the inequalities between farmers (financial support proportional to the land property, marginalisation of the farmers that are less socially integrated…)
Development of Agriculture Through Sustainable Production and Consumption
2021
The study includes some theoretical insights about the sustainability of agriculture, respectively a sustainable and responsible production and consumption. Through the choices they decide to make, both the producer who chooses to produce a sustainable product and the consumer because he buys and consumes products certified according to sustainability standards, a market is created based on a common effort to contribute to the sustainable development of agriculture. The harmonious development of the agricultural sector has two key actors, the final consumer of which through daily choices of sustainable products will increase the demand for these products, and producers will move to sustainable agricultural practices to meet demand, the ultimate goal being creating a sustainable agrifood market that provides products corresponding to the requirements of the sustainability, in this case also taking care of the future of generations. This paper presents a quantitative and qualitative analysis about sustainable agriculture, responsible production and responsible consumption of agri-food products that aims to highlight the importance of the analyzed topic. At the same time, the paper presents the analysis of some indicators to reflect the current situation of Romania regarding the level of achievement the sustainable development objectives, to highlight the path taken and to determine development opportunities at an accelerated pace of fulfilment a sustainable agriculture. The main results regarding the development of agriculture aim at the sustainable demand which is represented by the increase of the population's awareness regarding especially the social aspects and those that imply the protection of the environment, which determines the choice of sustainable products and sustainable production is represented by the increase in the number of agricultural producers who obtain voluntary sustainability standards. Current trends tend towards resilience given social inequity and environmental awareness.
MODERNIZATION OF AGRICULTURE VS SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE
The paper shows the correlation between the need to modernise agriculture and sustainable development. Modernisation of agriculture aiming only at increasing the efficiency of production, if implemented in accordance with the principles of sustainable development, enabled reduction in the negative external effects. Modernisation of agriculture is supposed to ensure productivity growth without imposing any threats to the natural environment and the well-being of animals, reduced impoverishment in rural areas as well as to ensure food security, growth in the profitability of farms, improvement to the efficiency of use of natural resources. Therefore, in the near future, the agriculture – environment relation will be subject to change taking into account, on the one hand, concern about the natural environment, and, on the other, pressure on increasing the efficiency of production. The above challenges will be addressed by the need to implement efficient and, at the same time, environmentally-friendly production technologies and relevant legal instruments which oblige agricultural producers to protect the natural environment.
The Evolution of the Agri-Environmental Policies and Sustainable Agriculture
… Exploring Diversity in …, 2002
Sustainable agriculture implies the exploitation of natural resources now, without compromising the natural resources stocks for the future generations. In the context of the paper, agricultural sustainability takes place at the interface between agriculture and the environment. The focus is on the interplay between farming systems and agrienvironmental policies. Agricultural policies have major impacts on soil and water quality and on biodiversity. Support commodity price policies have lead to serious problems of water pollution; high levels of soil erosion; nitrate losses and lost of biodiversity. The semi decoupeted income support policies and the introduction of the agrienvironmental schemes under the 1992 CAP reform were the first attempts to correct the negative aspects of the production-orientated policies. For the first time farmers were regarded as countryside and landscape keepers and as environmental conservationists. Under the 2000 Agenda similar emphasis was given to the sustainability of agriculture.
Sustainable Development of Agriculture
Sustainable Development of Agriculture, 1988
Food problems-the efficient production or procurement of food and its appropriate distribution among members of society-are problems endemic to mankind. Yet the nature and dimensions of these problems have been changing over time. As economic systems have developed, specialization has increased; and this has led to increased interdependences of rural and urban areas, of agricultural and nonagricultural sectors, and of nations. When the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) began the Food and Agriculture Program (FAP) in 1976, we started with these objectives: (1) To evaluate the nature and dimensions of the world food situation. (2) To identify the factors that affect it. (3) To suggest policy alternatives at national, regional, and global levels: (a) To alleviate current food problems. (b) To prevent food problems in the future. To realize these objectives, FAP was organized around two major tasks. The first task was directed at national policy for food and agriculture in an international situation. Here, computable general equilibrium models were developed for nearly 20 major developed and developing countries and were linked together to examine food trade, aid, capital flows, and how they affect hunger, in addition to the effects of national government policies, which were also considered in detail. This approach, however, needed to be complemented by another approach that dealt with food production at the farm level. The second task, therefore, began in 1980 and was directed to the sustainability of agriculture, with detailed considerations of resources, technology, and environment. This task needed conceptual work as well as case studies to illustrate the major constraints in the sustainability of agriculture. This book presents the results of this second task. Yet another major exercise by Drs. Mahendra Shah and Gunther Fischer, in collaboration with FAD, is reported elsewhere. It has a different focus in that it deals with resource potential for agriculture in developing countries.