Access is better for racial/ethnic elderly in Medicare HMOs--but disparities persist (original) (raw)
Related papers
Californian journal of health promotion, 2018
Background and Purpose: Following the Affordable Care Act (ACA) health insurance expansions, this study asks: did racial/ethnic group disparities in access to care remain? And specifically, did Latinos experience worse access to care after the ACA expansions compared to other racial/ethnic groups? Methods: Dataset: 2015 California Health Interview Survey (n=21,034; N=29,083,000). Participants: Adults, ages 18 and older, in California. Analyses: Bivariate chi-square tests and logistic multivariate regressions, including stratification by insurance. Results: Bivariate tests showed associations between racial/ethnic group and access to care. Latinos had lowest rates of having a usual source of care among uninsured (49.5%) and job-based coverage (85.2%). One-fifth of uninsured non-Latino whites (21%) report foregoing needed care. In the multivariate models, non-Latino whites had significantly higher odds of having a usual source of care (OR=1.32; p<0.05), but also of foregoing needed care (OR=1.43; p<0.05), than Latinos. Asian Americans had significantly lower odds of visiting a doctor in the past year (OR=0.65; p<0.05) than Latino adults. Conclusion: Following the ACA, disparities among racial/ethnic groups have become more complex. While Latino adults still have lower rates of having a usual source of care, Asian American adults have low rates of visiting a doctor, and non-Latino whites have high rates of foregoing needed care. Further research into the causes of difficulties in accessing care is needed, as health insurance expansions did not create health equity in solving access to care problems.
This chapter is a reflection on the changing health care policy climate in the U.S. These changes can either reduce current barriers or create new challenges to accessing health care. By all measures, older adults are the primary consumers of care. Their experience with barriers is intensely personal. Why discuss disparities within a context of health care quality? Health care access inequity and policy-based remedies have historic roots in civil rights legislation. The larger theme of this book is minority health and aging. This chapter explores the question - Can we identify policies that target specific barriers experienced by older minority adults? Does health care policy change access without specific reference to race, ethnicity, gender, or other individual characteristics?
Between 2013 and 2015, disparities with whites narrowed for blacks and Hispanics on three key access indicators: the percentage of uninsured working-age adults, the percentage who skipped care because of costs, and the percentage who lacked a usual care provider. Disparities were narrower, and the average rate on each of the three indicators for whites, blacks, and Hispanics was lower in both 2013 and 2015 in states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA than in states that did not expand. Among Hispanics, disparities tended to narrow more between 2013 and 2015 in expansion states than nonexpansion states. The ACA's coverage expansions were associated with increased access to care and reduced racial and ethnic disparities in access to care, with generally greater improvements in Medicaid expansion states. KEY TAKEAWAYS The Affordable Care Act has led to a drop in uninsured rates among blacks and Hispanics, narrowing disparities with whites. Between 2013 and 2015, disparities narrowed on three key health care access measures: the percentage of uninsured working-age adults, the percentage of adults who skipped care because of costs, and the percentage of adults who lacked a usual care provider. Disparities were narrower in states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA than in states that did not expand.
Does managed health care reduce health care disparities between minorities and Whites?
Journal of health economics, 2007
This paper investigates whether managed care ameliorates or aggravates ethnic and racial health care disparities in Medicare. First, we analyze the choice of type of insurance made by Medicare enrollees to see if minorities are more likely to choose the managed care alternative. Second, we study the differential effect of managed care on disparities using several measures of access, use and cost of services. Both analyses are conducted on two independent data sets, the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey and the National Health Interview Survey. We conclude that relative to Whites, minorities are at least as well off-in terms of benefits and costs-in Medicare managed care as in Medicare traditional indemnity plans.
Issue brief (Commonwealth Fund), 2015
This historical analysis shows that in the years just prior to the Affordable Care Act's expansion of health insurance coverage, black and Hispanic working-age adults were far more likely than whites to be uninsured, to lack a usual care provider, and to go without needed care because of cost. Among insured adults across all racial and ethnic groups, however, rates of access to a usual provider were much higher, and the proportion of adults going without needed care because of cost was much lower. Disparities between groups were narrower among the insured than the uninsured, even after adjusting for income, age, sex, and health status. With surveys pointing to a decline in uninsured rates among black and Hispanic adults in the past year, particularly in states extending Medicaid eligibility, the ACA's coverage expansions have the potential to reduce, though not eliminate, racial and ethnic disparities in access to care.
Health plan effects on patient assessments of medicaid managed care among racial/ethnic minorities
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2004
To examine the extent to which racial/ethnic differences in Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) ratings and reports of Medicaid managed care can be attributed to differential treatment by the same health plans (within-plan differences) as opposed to racial/ethnic minorities being disproportionately enrolled in plans with lower quality of care (between-plan differences). DESIGN: Data are from the National CAHPS Benchmarking Database (NCBD) 3.0. Data were analyzed using linear regression models to determine the overall effects, within-plan effects, and between-plan effects of race/ethnicity and language on patient assessments of care. Standard errors were adjusted for nonresponse weights and the clustered nature of the data. PATIENTS/ PARTICIPANTS: A total of 49,327 adults enrolled in Medicaid managed care plans in 14 states from 1999 to 2000. MAIN RESULTS: Non-English speakers reported worse experiences compared to those of whites, while Asian non-English speakers had the lowest scores for most reports and ratings of care. An analysis of between-plan effects showed that African Americans, Hispanic-Spanish speakers, American Indian/ Whites, and White-Other language were more likely than White-English speakers to be clustered in worse plans as rated by consumers. However, the majority of the observed racial/ ethnic differences in CAHPS reports and ratings of care are attributable to within-plan effects. The ratio of between to within variance of racial/ethnic effects ranged from 0.07 (provider communication) to 0.42 (health plan rating). CONCLUSIONS: The observed racial/ethnic differences in CAHPS ratings and reports of care are more a result of different experiences with care for people enrolled in the same plans than a result of racial/ethnic minorities being enrolled in plans with worse experiences. Health care organizations should engage in quality improvement activities to address the observed racial/ethnic disparities in assessments of care.
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Services and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
American Journal of Public Health, 2015
Objectives. We examined prereform patterns in insurance coverage, access to care, and preventive services use by race/ethnicity in adults targeted by the coverage expansions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). Methods. We used pre-ACA household data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to identify groups targeted by the coverage provisions of the Act (Medicaid expansions and subsidized Marketplace coverage). We examined racial/ethnic differences in coverage, access to care, and preventive service use, across and within ACA relevant subgroups from 2005 to 2010. The study took place at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in Rockville, Maryland. Results. Minorities were disproportionately represented among those targeted by the coverage provisions of the ACA. Targeted groups had lower rates of coverage, access to care, and preventive services use, and racial/ethnic disparities were, in some cases, widest within these targeted groups. Conclusions. Ou...
Health Services Research, 2015
Objective. To examine whether care experiences and immunization for racial/ethnic/language minority Medicare beneficiaries vary with the proportion of same-group beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage (MA) contracts. Data Sources/Study Setting. Exactly 492,495 Medicare beneficiaries responding to the 2008-2009 MA Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Survey. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Mixed-effect regression models predicted eight CAHPS patient experience measures from self-reported race/ethnicity/language preference at individual and contract levels, beneficiary-level case-mix adjustors, along with contract and geographic random effects. Principal Findings. As a contract's proportion of a given minority group increased, overall and non-Hispanic, white patient experiences were poorer on average; for the minority group in question, however, high-minority plans may score as well as low-minority plans. Spanish-preferring Hispanic beneficiaries also experience smaller disparities relative to non-Hispanic whites in plans with higher Spanish-preferring proportions. Conclusions. The tendency for high-minority contracts to provide less positive patient experiences for others in the contract, but similar or even more positive patient experiences for concentrated minority group beneficiaries, may reflect cultural competency, particularly language services, that partially or fully counterbalance the poorer overall quality of these contracts. For some beneficiaries, experiences may be just as positive in some high-minority plans with low overall scores as in plans with higher overall scores.