Building a Framework to Advance the Careers of Women in STEM at Predominantly Undergraduate Institutions (original) (raw)
Related papers
Perceptions of Barriers to Career Progression for Academic Women in STEM
Societies
Gender equity in academia is a long-standing struggle. Although common to all disciplines, the impacts of bias and stereotypes are particularly pronounced in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. This paper explores what barriers exist for the career progression of women in academia in STEM disciplines in order to identify key issues and potential solutions. In particular, we were interested in how women perceive the barriers affecting their careers in comparison to their male colleagues. Fourteen focus groups with female-identifying academics showed that there were core barriers to career progression, which spanned countries, disciplines and career stages. Entrenched biases, stereotypes, double standards, bullying and harassment all negatively impact women’s confidence and sense of belonging. Women also face an additional biological burden, often being pushed to choose between having children or a career. Participants felt that their experiences as ST...
Gender Issues, 2011
This study examines informal professional networks (IPNs) and their role in the underrepresentation of women faculty in traditionally male-dominated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. A mixedmethods design was taken in which interviews were conducted during the qualitative phase to gather information of faculty networking experiences and the importance of IPNs in their career development. An online survey was developed based on the findings from the interviews and used to gather data during the quantitative phase to further probe the patterns and functions of IPNs. Major findings are reported, including the meaningful impact of IPNs on the career development of faculty in STEM disciplines and some significant gender differences in networking patterns.
A Summary Report from the Research Partnership on Women in Science Careers
Journal of general internal medicine, 2018
In response to the landmark report "Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering," the NIH Office of Research on Women's Health issued a request for applications that funded 14 R01 grants to investigate causal factors to career success for women in STEM. Following completion of the 4-year grants, the grant PIs formed a grassroots collaborative, the Research Partnership on Women in Science Careers. To summarize the work of the Research Partnership, which resulted in over 100 publications. We developed six themes to organize the publications, with a "Best Practices" for each theme at the end of each section: Barriers to Career Advancement; Mentoring, Coaching, and Sponsorship; Career Flexibility and Work-Life Balance; Pathways to Leadership; Compensation Equity; and Advocating for Change and Stakeholder Engagement. Women still contend with sexual harassment, stereotype threat, a disproportionate burden of famil...
Mutual Mentoring To Promote Success and Satisfaction of Women Faculty in STEM
Educational and Outreach Projects from the Cottrell Scholars Collaborative Professional Development and Outreach Volume 2, 2017
Mutual mentoring groups that have been meeting regularly for the past eight years have been supporting the success of women faculty in STEM disciplines. Participants gather to each "work" on career and life challenges they face, by exchanging ideas with faculty from different departments and career stages. The community and shared experience of the mentoring group also combats the sense of isolation women faculty face in male-dominated departments. We describe how to foster the grassroots formation of successful mutual mentoring groups. Additional groups that have formed among female STEM faculty, female STEM graduate students, and non-white STEM faculty are providing a supportive environment for individuals from under-represented groups to thrive in STEM careers. Our Inspiration This article is intended to complement scholarly work on mentoring (1-4) by providing an anecdotal account of recent mutual mentoring groups at one institution, to illustrate the ease of implementation and value of this approach. Eight years ago we became interested in mutual mentoring to support the success of women faculty in STEM disciplines. The objective was to find a way for women faculty, who were often isolated within their STEM departments, to connect across departments and help each other thrive. The challenge was to imagine what activity people would want to add to their already very busy
“Dear future woman of STEM”: letters of advice from women in STEM
International Journal of STEM Education
Background Although a large body of research has identified challenges faced by women in STEM fields and strategies to improve the experience for women in STEM, little of this research has examined which strategies undergraduate women would recommend to their peers. In the current study, undergraduate women in STEM fields (N = 89) wrote letters to younger women in STEM about their experiences. The participants were recruited from a small public liberal arts college and a large public research institution in the United States. Participants were juniors and seniors majoring in engineering, mathematics, computer science, physics, biological or biomedical sciences, and chemistry. Results Using thematic analysis, we identified seven types of advice. The participants shared advice about improving academically, forming communities, finding family support, and seeking out women role models. They also provided general words of encouragement and reassured women that everyone struggles, and fa...
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
While longitudinal studies that examine the effects of personal and environmental factors on women's career motivation have been reported in the literature [1] [2], none have provided depth or breadth of biographical interviewing over the time span of the last two decades. Many intersecting variables have been identified by empirical research to account for women's continued underrepresentation in STEM careers, yet persistence, especially in computer science and engineering, remains an issue. Recent studies [3] [4] cite several contributing factors to the underrepresentation of women in the field and give special attention to women in STEM academic positions, with less focus on women in STEM careers broadly. In this pilot study the experiences that encourage or discourage women's interest and persistence in STEM careers through a retrospective analysis of their K-16 and early career experiences are explored. The researchers use a grounded theory approach [5] [6] to interview women about their experiences and use these data to formulate theoretical propositions that extend or challenge what is presently known about factors influencing underrepresentation of women in STEM careers. The influences of family, culture, K-16 educational experiences, and transition to the workforce of women ages 25-45 who have graduated from college in a STEM major, with particular emphasis in studying the experiences of women in engineering and computer science, are examined.
Career Navigation Initiatives for Women STEM Faculty in Support of Institutional Transformation
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
is an associate professor in the Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering Technology department at RIT. She serves as the Faculty Associate to the Provost for Women Faculty and is co-PI for RIT's NSF ADVANCE project. Her research interests include: characterization of biodegradable plastics and environmental consideration in materials selection for production design, the impact of technology paired with active learning pedagogies on student learning, and effective strategies for increasing gender diversity in STEM disciplines.
Evolution of a faculty mentoring program for STEM women
International Journal of Gender Science and Technology, 2011
As part of a five-year National Science Foundation (NSF) ADVANCE grant with the overall goal of recruiting, retaining, and professionally developing women faculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines on the Cal Poly Pomona (CPP) campus, ADVANCE at CPP developed a mentoring program for STEM female faculty. CPP is a state-funded, comprehensive university that primarily serves undergraduate students. This case study describes the development of the CPP ADVANCE mentoring program, from its informal beginnings, to a more formalized program with a variety of options for participants. The challenges faced in the development of the mentoring program, and the lessons gained from these challenges are shared.
Keeping University Women in STEM Fields
2010
Policies have been implemented at all educational levels to increase access and persistence in science and engineering education for women (Rosser, 1995; Spielhagen, 2008). A popular policy approach has been single-sex programs to advance women’s networking capabilities, confidence and interest in science (Spielhagen, 2008). The purpose of this study is to identify how women, who participated in a single-sex living and learning community (LLC) that focuses on women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics majors at a large research focused university in the United States, make their STEM career decisions and how the LLC affected that decision. Seven women who persisted in their chosen STEM field were interviewed via life history analysis methods. The results showed that these women shared similarities in their decisions to pursue STEM fields. The participation in a single-sex LLC had positive effects on women’s persistence. The results also showed that subtle discriminati...
Women increasingly earn advanced degrees in science, technology, and mathematics (STEM), yet remain underrepresented among STEM faculty. Much of the existing research on this underrepresentation relies on “chilly climate” and “pipeline” theoretical models to explain this phenomenon. However, the extent to which these models follow women’s actual career pathways has been undertheorized. Further, alternative metaphors may more aptly describe the career pathways of women STEM faculty. In our broader research project, we examine the ways women’s career pathways into STEM faculty positions are similar to and/or different from chilly climate and pipeline models, and if they vary based on race and/or ethnicity. At present, we focus on the ways oral histories and participatory research methods allow us to model the career pathways of women STEM faculty. Our goal is to illustrate how oral history and participatory research are effective methods to: 1) identify women’s career pathways into STEM faculty; 2) compare and contrast career pathways to climate and pipeline metaphors as well as discover new metaphors; 3) identify critical points in women’s career pathways; and 4) discover new information about women’s paths into STEM faculty. We describe early results from a set of semi-structured interviews of women faculty in STEM disciplines collected as part of research done through an ADVANCE grant, a NSF- funded project intended to achieve improved career success for women faculty in STEM disciplines. Interviews begin with oral histories that give context, depth, and structure to women’s pathways into STEM faculty careers. Through participatory research methods, we tell participants the goals of the research and ask them to discuss, challenge, and suggest ways institutions may improve career success for women STEM faculty. Taken together, career pathways are modeled and compared with chilly climate and pipeline models. This innovative methodological approach will inform policy, recruitment procedures, and ways to retain women faculty.