Young, S., & Duncan, H. (2014). Online and face-to-face teaching: How do student ratings differ? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 70-79 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Online and Face-to-Face Teaching: How Do Student Ratings Differ?
2014
This paper reports on a study whose purpose was to compare student ratings of instruction in online and face-to-face (F2F) higher education courses in an effort to better understand how faculty can strengthen their teaching in the online environment. Student ratings of instruction in online and on-campus courses were examined in two different ways that yielded similar findings. First, more than 8,000 student ratings of online and on-campus, traditional courses were compared. The ratings were based on 172 online courses and 470 on-campus courses. Results indicated that on-campus courses were rated significantly higher than online courses in Communication, Faculty/Student Interaction, Grading, Instructional Methods, and Course Outcomes; effect sizes were small. Student Effort was rated significantly higher for online courses than for F2F courses, also with a small effect size. A second analysis, using 11 pairs of the same course and same instructor, yielded similar findings. Students ...
A comparison of student evaluations of teaching between online and face-to-face courses
The Internet and Higher Education, 2007
The literature contains indications of a bias in student evaluations of teaching (SET) against online instruction compared to faceto-face instruction. The present case study consists of content analysis of anonymous student responses to open-ended SET questions submitted by 534 students enrolled in 82 class sections taught by 41 instructors, one online and one face-to-face class section for each instructor. There was no significant difference in the proportion of appraisal text segments by delivery method, suggesting no delivery method bias existed. However, there were significant differences in the proportion of text segments for topical themes and topical categories by delivery method. Implications of the findings for research and practice are presented.
Student Perceptions of Online Instruction
This study examined student perceptions of online teaching effectiveness in undergraduate courses. End-of course evaluation data were collected from a sample of 2,750 online multisection courses taught within a 12 month period and comparisons were made between highly rated courses (at 4.5 or higher on a 5 point scale) and low rated courses (at 3.0 or lower). There was a significant difference in course evaluations as a function of academic rank, with slightly lower ratings for faculty at lower ranks relative to those at higher ranks. In general, online teaching experience and experience teaching the same course were both weak predictors of course evaluation outcomes. Overall, in highly rated courses instructors were: receptive to questions, responded promptly to emails, provided timely feedback, posted grades in a timely manner, and were perceived as active participants in the online class. Further findings and recommendations to assist faculty in understanding online teaching evalu...
2021
Through the use of existing grade and student survey data, this study investigated online courses offered at a public four-year university. Specifically, the study explored differences in student success rates between online and face-to-face courses for traditional undergraduate students as well as the climate of student perceptions towards online courses. Our general results suggest that students performed better in, and had higher levels of preference toward, traditional face-to-face formats. However, overall perceptions of online courses were positive, with students viewing instructional technologies as reliable and easy to use, as well as reporting that online technologies facilitated prompt feedback, enhanced their problem-solving skills, and met their learning needs. Alongside this, students exhibited positive views towards their instructors’ skill level and use of technology to support academic success. Logistic regression analyses of differences in student success across ins...
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2018
This study examined the effectiveness of 3 online courses compared with the same 3 courses in a face-to-face (F2F) format, which had the same characteristics (e.g., the same instructor and final exam content and place). Effectiveness was examined by utilizing a wide range of variables, including 2 objective measures (N = 968): grades and completion rate; and 9 subjective measures (N = 360): 7 measures include instructional aspects (course structure, learning content, lessons watched, assignments, communication), engagement, and satisfaction. Findings indicate significant differences between online and F2F courses in most of the examined variables. Students in the online courses reported better understanding of the course structure, better communication with the course staff, watching the videos lessens more, and higher engagement and satisfaction. Students in the F2F courses reported better contribution of the learning content. Students' final grades were higher in the online courses, and no differences were found in the completion rate. The findings suggest that in many of the examined effectiveness aspects, online courses are as effective as, or more effective than, F2F courses. Interpretations of the findings are discussed.
Common Traits of the Best Online and Face-to-face Classes: Evidence from Student Surveys
2020
Increasingly, college students are enrolling in both online and face-to-face classes, while college instructors are teaching both online and face-to-face classes. What are the key similarities and differences in quality instruction across these formats? Instructors can benefit from knowing what the best classes have in common, and how to adjust their teaching to best fit the medium of delivery. We surveyed 2,007 undergraduate students at a public, metropolitan university and asked them about the best and worst classes they have ever taken. The resulting qualitative and quantitative data reveal some important consistencies across modalities—like effective communication and instructor availability. Other factors, however, differ by course format. Instructors seem to matter more in face-to-face courses, where they can establish personal relationships with students, whereas assignments are more important in online classes. Our findings can help college instructors in any modality reach ...
Student Evaluation of Teaching: The Inequity of Faculty Scores in Online versus Face-to-Face Courses
2013
Researchers have conducted a multitude of studies over the last century on Student Evaluations of Teaching (SET); however, very few have been conducted in the new digital age (Loveland, 2007). More work is in progress as researchers try to define the differences in student responses and thoughts about the online teaching environment. The unfortunate side of this can be the administrative decision to use a one-size-fits-all mentality when many authors including Dziuban and Moskal (2011) have outlined several research-based alternatives for evaluation of online instructional effectiveness. SETs are important to faculty because they often are the determining factor in merit pay and tenure/promotion. Faculty use SETs to guide decision-making about their curriculum and instructional strategies used to deliver the course (Sheehan & DuPrey, 1999). The power of the SET is recognized as a driving force in academia. What are often not discussed are the differences between SET for face-to-face courses versus SET for online courses.
Comparing student and faculty perceptions of online and traditional courses
The Internet and Higher Education, 2013
The use of online courses on college campuses has grown substantially in recent years, despite limited information on how these courses are perceived by faculty and students, compared to traditional (classroom) classes. In this study, two separate, but equivalent, surveys were developed to compare the perceptions of faculty and students. Comparisons were made between the perceptions of faculty who have taught the same course using online and traditional formats to the perceptions of students who have taken online and traditional courses using a series of 7-point Likert scales. Both surveys measured: 1) perceptions of online versus traditional courses, 2) perceptions of students who take online courses and students' motivations for taking online courses, 3) perceptions of faculty members who teach online courses; and 4) demographic characteristics. Analysis of data included the comparison of mean values between faculty and students and Pearson correlation analysis to determine relationships between questions. Of the 25 questions investigated in this study, 12 showed significant differences in means between faulty and student perceptions (p b 0.001). Significant findings from this research showed that compared to faculty perceptions, students tend to see online courses as more self-directed and believe that online students must be more willing to teach themselves. Students in online courses feel more disconnected from professors and fellow students than professors believe them to be. In addition, faculty tend to see the role of the professor as more critical to the success of online courses than students do.
Face-to-Face versus Online Course Evaluations: A "Consumer's Guide" to Seven Strategies
2013
The research on student rating scales and other measures of teaching effectiveness in face-to-face (F2F) courses has been accumulating for 90 years. With the burgeoning international development of online and blended/hybrid courses over the past decade, the question of what measures to use has challenged directors of distance education programs. Can the traditional F2F scales already in operation be applied to online courses or do all new scales have to be designed? Despite the increasing number of online courses, attention to their evaluation lags far behind that of F2F courses in terms of available measures, quality of measures, and delivery systems. The salient characteristics of F2F and online courses are compared to determine whether they are really different enough to justify separate scales and evaluation systems. Based on a review of the research and current practices, seven concrete measurement options were generated. They are proffered and critiqued as a state-of-the-art &...
Faculty Perception of Online Instruction and Student Learning
i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 2011
faculty acceptance of online instruction. In contrast, when comparing the learning outcomes in online education versus face-to-face there is an overall increase in rating online education as the 'Same,' 'Somewhat Superior,' or 'Superior' from 57% to 68% to traditional courses (Allen & Seaman, 2010). As online education increases, faculty perceptions of teaching and learning online show uncertainty and a lack of commitment. Learning how faculty perceive the effectiveness of instruction and student learning in online courses is valuable to educational institutions and important to the success of online learning education (Curran, 2008). This study investigates how faculty perceive student learning in online courses versus the traditional, face-to face environment at a Hispanic-Serving institution. Theoretical Framework While online enrollments are on the rise, most colleges and universities are facing severe pressures to cut costs due to cuts in state funding for higher education and a decrease in university endowments (Neely & Tucker, 2010). One answer to the pressure to reduce costs for many colleges