Long-term innovative problem solving skills: Redefining problem solving (original) (raw)
Related papers
Young engineers and problem solving: The impact of learning problem solving explicitly
This paper explores what young engineers perceive as good problem solving and how these factors are impacted when students learned problem solving explicitly. Data from three sources were considered: surveys, interviews and Repertory Grid Technique data. It was found that teaching problem solving explicitly impacts perceived ability to solve problems which the participants believe to be important for motivation in facing problems. It was also found learning problem solving explicitly impacts the ability to consider problems from different angles, creativity and management of information which participants consider essential for good problem solving.
Do we succeed in developing problem-solving skills–the engineering students’ perspective
This paper examines findings of a problem-solving skills survey conducted at RMIT in 2010-2011, involving 320 student respondents. It will discuss the following questions: (1) Are there any differences in perceptions of students from different schools on their problem-solving skills? (2) Do students perceive themselves as better problem solvers as a result of their engineering degree studies? (3) What activities improved students' problem-solving skills the most? The findings suggest an approach to enhance studentperceived effectiveness of their problem-solving skills.
A process analysis of engineering problem solving and assessment of problem solving skills
2012
In the engineering profession, one of the most critical skills to possess is accurate and efficient problem solving. Thus, engineering educators should strive to help students develop skills needed to become competent problem solvers. In order to measure the development of skills, it is necessary to assess student performance, identify any deficiencies present in problem solving attempts, and identify trends in performance over time. Through iterative assessment using standard assessment metrics, researchers/instructors are able to track trends in problem solving performance across time, which can serve as a gauge of students' learning gains. This research endeavor studies the problem solving process of first year engineering students in order to assess how person and process factors influence problem-solving success. This research makes a contribution to the literature in engineering education by 1) providing a coding scheme that can be used to analyze problem solving attempts in terms of the process rather than just outcomes, 2) providing an assessment tool which can be used to measure performance along the seven stage problem solving cycle, and 3) describing the effects of person and process factors on problem solving performance.
A comparative evaluation of problem solving in engineering education
de Vere, I., Kuys, B. & Melles, G. (2010) A comparative evaluation of problem solving in engineering education. When Design Education and Design Research Meet, the 12th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE), NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
Engineering education has been criticised for focusing solely on the science of engineering, to thedetriment of preparing students for the practice of engineering. Graduates are considered by many inindustry to be ill-prepared for real world problem solving and to have limited experience in applyingtheir engineering knowledge to product outcomes. Instruction in design is uncommon, and whereexisting, follows a linear and predictable process that does not afford students opportunity forexperimentation and exploration. However new engineering education pedagogy seeks to addressthese issues through early integration of design and project based learning into the curricula.This paper describes the initial findings of a comparative evaluation exercise conducted to measurerelative aptitude in problem solving by two disciplines of final year engineering students and thusvalidate the impact of new engineering curricula. The evaluated students were from a typicalMechanical Engineering course and from the less conventional Product Design Engineering programwhich integrates industrial design studies into mechanical engineering curricula. Students problem solving methods were observed, the design outcomes were evaluated and participants surveyed. These exercises challenged the student‟s problem framing and solving abilities and required the applicationof engineering science and design acumen to achieve a creative solution for either an open-ended orconstrained problem. The early findings of this ongoing investigation are examined here, and thebenefits of developing a creative design focus within an engineering curriculum are clearly evident.
Problem solving and creativity in Engineering: turning novices into professionals
Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education, 2009
Recent UK and European benchmarks for both undergraduate and professional engineers highlight the importance of problem solving skills. They additionally identify creativity as an important capacity alongside problem solving for both novices and professionals. But, how can we develop and encourage these important skills in undergraduate engineers?
A holistic view on the development of engineering students' flexible and creative problem solving
This paper presents results of an interpretive study into engineering students' formation of professional competence from the interaction of learning activities and other influences from the learning environment. Data was collected in focus groups with students from Germany, Australia, the United States and Thailand. Using the qualitative analysis tool NVivo7, the interpretive data analysis categorised factors influencing the formation of students' competence and derived seven competency clusters that were found to be significant in the students' transition from university into professional practice. A particularly important cluster contained competencies related to the students' ability to flexibly and creatively solve engineering problems. The analysis revealed that a number of educational influences such as schematic learning approaches in single-discipline lectures have a negative impact on the development of this competency cluster. In order to mitigate these negative processes we propose a holistic perspective on the educational process combined with measures to support reflective awareness of the complexities of competence formation in both teachers and students.