Asylum Policy and Custom Clearances in the Perspective of the Reform Treaty (original) (raw)
Related papers
European Migration Policies and the Rights of Asylum
2016
The European Union is confronted with a deep migration crisis, at a time when the EU has changed from being a source of stability and security into becoming a generator of political instability and economic chaos. This chapter outlines the main parameters of Europe’s immigration issue and the right of asylum. It presents the European migration policies of the last decade and traces the reasons behind its complete or near failure. The European Union takes into account how to rid itself of migrants through certain measures of tightening the law on asylum, and closing the borders. The result is that those states which had most fought against borders and walls and were committed to them being permanently eliminated, are now rushing to raise them again. Meanwhile, the security threat that has increased across the whole Union due to the mismanagement of migration. The European Union has spent years developing the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). The aim of CEAS is to ensure the rights of asylum seekers by law. The system establishes minimum standards and procedures for processing and assessing claims for asylum and for the treatment of asylum seekers and those granted refugee status. Nevertheless, a large number of EU member states have yet to correctly implement these standards. Instead there is a collage of 28 different asylum systems producing uneven results? Finally, this chapter examines the EU asylum system itself. The chapter analyses how national asylum systems interact under the law of the EU, applying the criteria of the distribution of state responsibility to investigate asylum applications. This chapter addresses two key concepts in the development of European asylum law in particular: the concept of solidarity and the concept of trust, the application of which has been demonstrably weak in the European Union asylum system.
European Migration Policies and the Right of Asylum
2016
The European Union is confronted with a deep migration crisis, at a time when the EU has changed from being a source of stability and security into becoming a generator of political instability and economic chaos. This chapter outlines the main parameters of Europe's immigration issue and the right of asylum. It presents the European migration policies of the last decade and traces the reasons behind its complete or near failure. The European Union takes into account how to rid itself of migrants through certain measures of tightening the law on asylum, and closing the borders. The result is that those states which had most fought against borders and walls and were committed to them being permanently eliminated, are now rushing to raise them again. Meanwhile, the security threat that has increased across the whole Union due to the mismanagement of migration. The European Union has spent years developing the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). The aim of CEAS is to ensure the r...
The Immigration and Asylum Policy of the European Union
2016
Mass migration, as it appears in the 21st century, is one of the greatest challenges of our globalized world. The unanswered questions of European Union (EU) immigration policy that emerged over the past few decades have become more pressing than ever. One of these urgent questions is: how can we provide for a developing European economy in an era of demographic decline in a way that it is based on the opportunities opened up by legally regulated forms of migration. A second question is: how can the EU ensure the safety of the newly arriving people in need and, at the same time, keep away illegal migrants and eliminate criminal activities related to migration. The European Union is destined to spread the principles of peace and unconditional respect for human rights not only within its own borders, but also on a global scale, when engaging in international affairs. In addition to observing human rights, however, the EU must also take into account all security considerations that are...
Pressure on national asylum systems due to increasing numbers of asylum seekers and the opening of internal borders have led to cooperation at a common level since 1980. However, the EU laws and policies on asylum have mainly focused on the reduction of asylum claims rather than creating a fair and accessible asylum system. This has raised a concern whether it is compatible with the commitment of the EU to protect the right to seek refugee status within its territory. The main aim of this dissertation is to analyse the EU common asylum policy and its compatibility with the right to seek asylum under the Universal Declaration of Human Right. To this aim, after describing and analysing on the international protection regime and its limitations for refugees, the thesis will extensively examine the EU asylum policy and its restrictive policies. These restrictive policies under the non-arrival and non-admission policies such as visa requirements, carrier sanctions, the safe third country concept and readmission agreements are aimed at preventing asylum seekers from arriving at EU territory and from accessing asylum determination procedures. In analysing these policies, this thesis will demonstrate how the EU has developed strict policies to be protected from refugees entering its territory and undermined the right to seek asylum and its non-refoulement obligation. This thesis therefore, suggests that the EU should support and encourage stability and the development of refugee-producing countries rather than focusing on discouraging asylum seekers with restrictive policies.
The fundamentally revised and extended second edition of the ‘Commentary on EU immigra-tion and Asylum Law’ comprises four thematic introductions, which are written in the style of an advanced textbook and which are meant to help practitioners, doctoral students and aca-demics who are not familiar with immigration and asylum law to orientate themselves in a highly complex and politically sensitive area of the law. The general introduction starts with general remarks on the evolution of the Treaty regime and objectives for lawmaking before analysing, in greater death, the principles for the interpretation of EU legislation on immigra-tion and asylum. In doing so, it covers general principles, such as proportionality or the role of individual rights, as well as the significance of provisions on more favourable national measures on the basis of academic contributions and pertinent Court judgments on immigra-tion and asylum. It proceeds with a general introduction into the Treaty rules governing the respective opt outs for Denmark, the United Kingdom and Ireland. It concludes with an over-view of the requirements of human rights and public international law under the EU Charter, the European Convention, the Refugee Convention and other international agreements. The general introduction is complemented by chapters with more detailed information on the legal framework for border control and entry policies, immigration and asylum.
The fundamentally revised and extended second edition of the ‘Commentary on EU Immigration and Asylum Law’ comprises four thematic introductions, which are written in the style of an advanced textbook and which are meant to help practitioners, doctoral students and academics who are not familiar with immigration and asylum law to orientate themselves in a highly complex and politically sensitive area of the law. The introduction into the ‘Legal Framework for EU Asylum Policy’ starts with general remarks on the evolution of asylum policy and the opt-outs for the UK, Ireland and Denmark. It continues, on this basis, with one of the most detailed and reliable analyses of the scope of Union competences under Article 78 TFEU, whose provisions serve as the legal bases for supranational legislation on asylum. The contribution also introduces readers to overarching principles regarding mixed flows and the prescription of inter-state solidarity in Article 80 TFEU. It concludes with a description of the international legal framework with an emphasis on the Geneva Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights for asylum policy. In doing so, it discusses, for instance, the status and interpretation of the Geneva Convention within the EU legal order and the pertinence of the human rights enshrined in the ECHR for status determination, reception conditions and asylum procedure.
2018
The reform of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) was much wished for both by committed Europeans and by human rights advocates more generally. Ideally, the European Union (EU) would have developed a single asylum system with equal criteria applying to all Member States and full recognition of the international protection status everywhere in the Union. This would have taken care of the primary concern of the Member States, that is, the prevention of asylum seekers' secondary movements. The abandonment of the nation-specific prerogatives would also have allowed for a focus on the asylum seekers' needs. However, the proposals issued by the European Commission between 2015 and 2016 in no way suggest that a uniform asylum system is on the way. This paper examines the implications of some of these proposals for the governance of asylum and for the understanding of international protection as the guarantee of specific rights to foreign citizens in need. It further assesses t...
International Migration and Asylum in the European Union: Recent Developments and Policy Reactions
Europe, following North America, is one of the most attractive migration and asylum destinations in the world. According to studies, international migration benefits the EU because today the EU confronts dual demographic challenges: aging of population and population decline. Though some believe that Europe needs immigrates for its economy, others claim that immigrants are harming the European Union by making European Societies less cohesive. Also, there is significant public anxiety about internal and external migration in Europe making this situation susceptible to exploitation by politicians and extreme parties. Respect for human rights is a core principle for the EU, hence, the EU is obliged to help asylum-seekers and react to refugees within the EU borders humanely and with human dignity. The European Union authorities are aware that immigrants are needed for the EU’s future but member states have different sensitivities, priorities, and concerns regarding the migration and asylum policies. This paper aims to analyze the recent developments, challenges, policy reactions, whether the EU needs a new common migration and asylum policy.