A Critical Legal Studies Perspective (original) (raw)

This comment critically examines arguments made by Professor Finnis regarding the clarity and determinacy of legal questions within the framework of Critical Legal Studies (CLS). By addressing the concept of 'easy questions' and the notion of indeterminacy in legal propositions, this analysis seeks to highlight the limitations of using examples of determinate legal rules as refutations of the CLS perspective. The discussion will navigate between sociological and philosophical dimensions of CLS while emphasizing the importance of reframing the conversation around the complexity and context of legal reasoning.