Measures of Economic Inequality Focusing on the Status of the Lower and Middle Income Groups (original) (raw)
Related papers
Inequality Measurement and the Rich: Why inequality increased more than we thought
2018
Many standard inequality measures can be written as ratios with the mean in the denominator. When one income moves away from equality, both the numerator and the denominator may vary in the same direction and such indices may decrease. This anomalous behaviour is not shared by median-normalised inequality measures developed in this paper, where the mean at the denominator is replaced by the median. However, median-normalised inequality measures do not respect the principle of transfers. We show that the absolute Gini and the mean logarithmic deviation, or second Theil index, are the only measures that both avoid anomalous behaviour when one income is varied and also satisfy the principle of transfers. An application shows that the increase in inequality in the United States over recent decades is understated by the Gini index and that the mean logarithmic deviation index should be preferred in practice.
Theoretical Economics Letters, 2018
Income distributions are commonly unimodal and skew with a heavy right tail. Different skew models, such as the lognormal and the Pareto, have been proposed as suitable descriptions of income distribution and applied in specific empirical situations. More wide-ranging tools have been introduced as measures for general comparisons. In this study, we review the income analysis methods and apply them to specific Lorenz models.
The World Distribution of Income And Its Inequality, 1970-2009
Review of Income and Wealth, 2013
This paper provides a full decomposition of world inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient, in the period 1970-2009. In particular, using the Analysis of Gini (ANOGI), the paper describes the evolution of between inequality, within inequality, and the impact of overlapping on both factors. While there is evidence that between inequality in the last decade significantly declined due to the rapid Chinese growth, within inequality and overlapping went in the opposite direction. Furthermore, with the exception of some Asian countries, the rest of the world has not moved significantly. As a result, world inequality remains high by any standard.
AN IMPLIED INCOME INEQUALITY INDEX USING L1 NORM ESTIMATION OF LORENZ CURVE
2000
Distribution of income is among the most important issues in welfare economics. It is discussed that for more equal distribution of income and welfare government should redistribute income and to achieve more equality and promote total utility of the society. Economic literature provides different ways to measure income inequality. While there are alternative methods, there is no best way to calculate the inequality index. Most common inequality indices provide information about points on the distribution function and analyze the inequality of income without any reference to the amount of the money needed to improve the distribution. In this paper, we identify an income inequality index. Using this index, we will estimate the Lorenz Curve function parameters and show how much transfer payment is needed to achieve a desired distribution of income consistent with the perceived economic goals of the society. Therefore, we design a model to estimate Lorenz Curve and find a fiscal-compensation-based index for reduction of the degree of inequality. By this approach, any Census summary data can be used to measure the distribution of income. Using our calculated implied-inequality-index, we may redistribute a percentage of income to the lower income group and thereby improve the distribution.
Measuring income inequality via percentile relativities
The rich are getting richer" implies that the population income distributions are getting more right-skewed and heavy-tailed. For such distributions, the mean is not the best measure of the center, but the classical indices of income inequality, including the celebrated Gini index, are all mean-based. In view of this, Professor Gastwirth sounded an alarm back in 2014 by suggesting to incorporate the median into the definition of the Gini index, although noted a few shortcomings of his proposed index. In the present paper we make a further step in the modification of classical indices and, to acknowledge the possibility of differing viewpoints, arrive at three median-based indices of inequality. They avoid the shortcomings of the previous indices and can be used even when populations are ultra-heavy tailed, that is, when their first moments are infinite. The new indices are illustrated both analytically and numerically using parametric families of income distributions, and further illustrated using a real data set of capital incomes of fifteen countries. We also discuss the performance of the indices from the perspective of the Pigou-Dalton principle of transfers.
International Journal of Business Administration, 2022
Since the last decades of the twentieth century, there has been a debate on the causes and consequences regarding the rise of inequality in its varied dimensions. Much discussion is dedicated to whether public policies should be aimed at reducing or mitigating the upward trend in inequality. This paper explores empirical evidence regarding the income inequality level that maximizes the per capita consumption of the U.S. economy from 1946 to 2015. Based on the cointegration equations empirical tests, we find a concave nonlinear relation between the log of per capita consumption and the log of the Gini Index. In this context, the optimal level of income inequality is 0.376. In addition, we test whether some determinants of inequality show a nonlinear relationship with the square of the difference between the current Gini index and its optimal level, (Gini – Gini*)2. The relation between (Gini-Gini*)2 and education shows an inverted U-shaped curve in which the threshold value wasn’t re...
Income Inequality and Its Measures: Evidence from OECD and European Countries
This paper is by nature an exploration study aimed to examine the measures of income inequality and is integrated with an empirical investigation of possible factors affecting the level of inequality. Recent data shows that the gap between poor and rich has been widening on an international scale. The way to solve this " sharing of created economic value " problem begins with the problem of how to measure inequality. Our literature review revealed different ways of measurement and how the concept of inequality was approached as well as it determines possible candidates for factors in empirical analysis. By making reference to De Maio's findings (2007), most widely used methods of measurement are mentioned. A description of current situation in developed and developing economies based on most popular measure, which is Gini coefficient, is also provided. Our empirical setting, to define factors influencing Gini coefficient, is employing data for 32 developed and developing OECD and EU countries in 2011 and 2012. We estimated an OLS model to the relation between Gini coefficients and several pre-identified regressors. We have found a linear relation with average income tax rate (taxrate) and with labor force participation rate (laborrate). The fact that public policies in taxation and labor force participation should be altered to cope with inequality is stressed in the paper.
Measuring income inequality based on unequally distributed income
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination
This paper proposes a new framework for measuring income inequality. The framework is based on the unequally distributed (UD) incomes that are obtained by removing the equally distributed parts from incomes. We then derive the normalized norm indexes from the cumulative distribution function and the unscaled Lorenz curve of the UD incomes. The relation between the normalized norm indexes and the popular Gini coefficient and coefficient of variation (CV) shows that the Gini coefficient and CV represent only parts of income inequality. We analyze example income distributions and the Luxembourg Income Study datasets to show that the normalized norm indexes evaluate income inequality appropriately and solve the negative income problem.
Regression Analyses of Income Inequality Indices
Theoretical Economics Letters, 2018
Scientists have analysed different methods for numerical estimation of Gini coefficients. Using Lorenz curves, various numerical integration attempts have been made to identify accurate estimates. Central alternative methods have been the trapezium, Simpson and Lagrange rules. They are all special cases of the Newton-Cotes methods. In this study, we approximate the Lorenz curve by polynomial regression models and integrate optimal regression models for numerical estimation of the Gini coefficient. The attempts are checked on theoretical Lorenz curves and on empirical Lorenz curves with known Gini indices. In all cases the proposed methods seem to be a good alternative to earlier methods presented in the literature.