An Investigation on the Removal of Arsenic from Simulated Groundwater by Adsorption Using Iron and Iron Oxide[III] (original) (raw)
Related papers
Water Pollution X, 2010
Drinking water has been identified as one of the major sources of arsenic exposure by the general population. A variety of treatment processes has been studied for arsenic removal from water. One of the most used methods is adsorption. The most efficient adsorbent materials are those with iron content considering the affinity of arsenic towards iron. Relatively limited information is available regarding the impact of temperature on the arsenic (As) (III) adsorption kinetic and equilibrium capacities on iron oxide. In this paper we studied the possibility of using iron oxide as an adsorbent for the removal of As (III) from aqueous solutions. The iron oxide was obtained through annealing of iron oxalate at 550°C. The effects of contact time, initial concentration of the solutions and temperature on the removal of As (III) were investigated in order to explain the adsorption mechanism. The kinetic of As (III) adsorption can be described well by the pseudo-second-order models. The equilibrium adsorption data were fitted using Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm equations and the corresponding parameters were calculated and discussed in detail. An increase in temperature increases the values of the overall adsorption reaction rate constant. An examination of thermodynamic parameters shows that the adsorption of As (III) by iron oxide is an endothermic process and is spontaneous at the specific temperature investigated.
Adsorption and removal of arsenic from water by iron ore mining waste
Water Science and Technology, 2009
There is a global need to develop low-cost technologies to remove arsenic from water for individual household water supply. In this study, a purified and enriched waste material (treated magnetite waste, TMW) from the Trai Cau's iron ore mine in the Thai Nguyen Province in Vietnam was examined for its capacity to remove arsenic. The treatment system was packed with TMW that consisted of 75% of ferrous-ferric oxide (Fe3O4) and had a large surface area of 89.7 m2/g. The experiments were conducted at a filtration rate of 0.05 m/h to treat groundwater with an arsenic concentration of 380 μg/L and iron, manganese and phosphate concentrations of 2.07 mg/L, 0.093 mg/L and 1.6 mg/L respectively. The batch experimental results show that this new material was able to absorb up to 0.74 mg arsenic/g. The results also indicated that the treatment system removed more than 90% arsenic giving an effluent with an arsenic concentration of less than 30 μg/L while achieving a removal efficiency of ...
Physicochemical study of arsenic removal using iron hydroxide
Iron hydroxide (III) synthesized and applied to remove the As (III) and As (V). The optimum pH on the adsorption is between pH 4 and pH 9. Experiments were performed to study the effect of pH and the contact time (T) on the Co precipitation-sorption of Arsenic (III) and Iron (III) Hydroxides. Several co-precipitation experiments are performed with 120 mg of iron (III), from solutions having a pH ranging from about 4.7 and 9, at time 240 min. In this study, the adsorption of the arsenic (III) on the surface of iron hydroxide (III) is examined by adopting surface complexation model, This model successfully used to describe the adsorption of iron on the metal oxides suppose that this phenomenon occurs through an inner-sphere legend exchange mechanisms with surface functional group (≡ FeOH). The results of the study show that the co-precipitation of arsenic (III) with Fe (OH)3 was more dependent on the concentration of iron and H + ions. Complexation in a monodentate area was more impor...
January 2021, 2021
The work focuses on the removal of Arsenic-III (As(III)) from water sample by an indigenous iron ore from Balochistan by adsorption method. Three iron ore samples were analyzed by X-Ray Diffractometer (XRD) and a sample from Shikarap containing iron 36.2% was selected because it contained the highest amount of hematite. The batch study was conducted to examine the adsorption by iron ore and maximum adsorption was observed at pH 6, 1/2 g dose per 50 mL solution, contact time 2 hr and shaking speed 150 rpm. At the optimized conditions, the removal was 89% when monitored at 50μg L-1 initial concentration of arsenic. The arsenic removal was monitored by Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS) using hydride generation. Dubinin - Radushkevich (D-R), Freundlich and Langmuir's isotherms were examined. The highest adsorption capacityof iron ore for As(III) removal was observed 13.67 μg g-1 by Langmuir model and Freundlich isotherm indicated good adsorption intensity with value n = 1.512. Th...
Kinetic investigation on arsenic (III) adsorption onto iron hydroxide(III
The objective of this study was to investigate the adsorption kinetics of As (III) on iron Hydroxide (III). The physicochemical parameters considered during our experiments are iron Hydroxide (III) weight, pH and contact time. Three kinetic models of sorption were investigated: pseudo-first-order model, pseudo-second-order model and the intra-particle diffusion model. The results show that these adsorption regimes are based on the equilibrium concentration of arsenic. We observed that the adsorption based on the metal retention capacity In the presence of interactions between the arsenic and different groups of the matrices. Pseudo-first-order model is relatively fast, so the arsenic (III) was adsorbed as a monodentate complex. However, the slower pseudo-second-order model indicates that the arsenic forms a bidentate complex with the hydroxide iron (III).
Water Science & Technology Water Supply
Arsenic can be selectively removed from water through adsorption on a natural manganese oxide. This paper presents some of the key parameters controlling such a process. Both production and regeneration steps were studied and the influence of three main controlling parameters was put to light. The water pH greatly influenced the adsorption capacity. Low water pH highly improved the treatment. The adsorption being under mass transfer limitation, flow rate influence was measured and optimization solutions were proposed. Finally, the impact of the regeneration procedure was evaluated on the adsorbent stability. It gave good arsenic elution results but the caustic elution step generated fine particles that could not be avoided. The following neutralization could however be adjusted in order to minimize further adsorbent dissolution.
Effect of competing solutes on arsenic(V) adsorption using iron and aluminum oxides
Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2007
The study focused on the effect of several typical competing solutes on removal of arsenic with Fe 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 . The test results indicate that chloride, nitrate and sulfate did not have detectable effects, and that selenium(IV) (Se(IV)) and vanadium(V) (V(V)) showed slight effects on the adsorption of As(V) with Fe 2 O 3 . The results also showed that adsorption of As(V) on Al 2 O 3 was not affected by chloride and nitrate anions, but slightly by Se(IV) and V(V) ions. Unlike the adsorption of As(V) with Fe 2 O 3 , that with Fe 2 O 3 was affected by the presence of sulfate in water solutions. Both phosphate and silica have significant adverse effects on the adsorption of As(V) adsorption with Fe 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 . Compared to the other tested anions, phosphate anion was found to be the most prominent solute affecting the As(V) adsorption with Fe 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 . In general, Fe 2 O 3 has a better performance than Al 2 O 3 in removal of As(V) within a water environment where multi competing solutes are present.
Removal of arsenic from simulated groundwater by adsorption using iron-modified rice husk carbon
Journal of Water and Environment Technology, 2009
This study focused on the removal of arsenic from simulated groundwater by batch adsorption using iron-modified rice husk carbon (RH-Fe). The results showed that RH-Fe was very effective in the removal of arsenic not only at low and moderate initial concentrations of arsenic (1.42 and 2.77 mg/L) but also at very high initial concentrations of arsenic (4.61 and 7.38 mg/L). The arsenic adsorption by RH-Fe was dependent on pH and varied with arsenic initial concentration and adsorbent dose. Langmuir isotherm could describe the adsorption equilibrium and the adsorption capacity was found to be 2.24mg/g. The pseudo-second order kinetic model gave the best fit with the experimental data.
Kinetic Model of Arsenic Sorption onto Zero-Valent Iron (ZVI
Water Quality, Exposure and Health, 2011
This study investigated the mechanisms involved in removing arsenic from water using zero-valent iron (ZVI) as sorbent. Relatively limited information is available on the kinetics aspects of sorption of arsenic compounds onto ZVI. In order to gain an understanding of the sorption kinetics, a detailed study was conducted in a controlled batch test and developed sorption kinetic model. The effects of different arsenic concentrations on the kinetics sorption rates of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) were investigated. Arsenic(V) was removed by two mechanisms—surface adsorption and co-precipitation with Fe(III) on ZVI, while arsenic(III) was removed by adsorption on ZVI and oxidized to arsenic(V). Reaction rate constants were calculated for arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) at different concentrations by a second-order kinetic model. The results indicate that ZVI could be employed as sorbent materials to enhance the adsorption and co-precipitation processes to improve the removal rate of arsenic from water. The results also showed that the arsenic(III) oxidized to arsenic(V), while the analyses indicated that there was no measurable reduction of arsenic(V) to arsenic(III).
Arsenic Adsorption by Some Iron Oxide Minerals: Influence of Interfacial Chemistry
Ghana Mining Journal, 2020
The dramatic increase in hydrometallurgical extraction of gold from arsenic bearing gold ores has inevitably resulted in the release of arsenic into the environment worldwide. Residual arsenic minerals in tailings storage facilities can be oxidised and mobilise arsenic into the environment. This can contaminate soils, ground and surface waters and eventually biota. In spite of well-established technologies and recent advances in arsenic remediation, there are limited knowledge and understanding of the iron oxide substrate (goethite, hematite and magnetite) mineralogy and the fate of arsenic on the surface charge of these iron oxide substrates in an aqueous media during adsorption. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of interfacial chemistry on arsenic adsorption onto selected iron oxide particles to assist in developing a better understanding and new knowledge in arsenic removal from contaminated waters. Bulk mineralogy and partial chemical composition of s...