International Migrations in a Context of Global Change (original) (raw)
Related papers
Global migrations: a constant challenge for the international community
Panorama Internacional FEE brings to the debate, in its third edition, the issue of international migration. The phenomenon of human migration has been recurrent in the evolutionary process of societies. Its dimensions, its causes and its effects lie in the fields of politics, economics, religion, the history of climate change, etc. The complexity of the issue is extremely important for the understanding of other historical, political, economic and social phenomena. How can one understand, for example, the formation of national states and their political and economic systems throughout history without taking into account the role of migration flows in the context of all these processes? Given the complexity inherent to the dynamics of migration movements, assigning Global migrations: a constant challenge for the international community |
International Migration in The World of Nation-States:Implications, Challenges, and Policy Responses
MIGRATION STUDIES: EURASIAN PERSPECTIVES, 2023
correspond to different policies toward cross-border migration and migrant populations, such as migration restrictions, the segregation of migrants and denial of naturalization, ethnic preferences in migration policies, the expectation of linguistic and cultural assimilation, or the accommodation of cultural peculiarities of migrant groups. The chapter also discusses the role of nationalism and nation-building in facilitating forced migration through population exchanges, mass deportations, and ethnic cleansing. Finally, the chapter addresses cases in which sustained migration flows can sometimes turn into a driving force behind the alteration of fundamental nation-building principles in destination countries.
RUDN Journal of Sociology, 2017
In the second half of the XX century, the humankind witnessed the insurmountable and irreversible power of globalization processes, which influence all spheres of social life and establish a global system of interdependency between countries and nations. Globalization within impetuous changes in global political, social and economic systems has determined dramatic shifts in the international migration processes that lead to the new stage of migration history. In nowadays globalized world, international migration has become a reality for almost all corners of the globe. The author considers features of the recent trends of international migration: the unprecedented growth of the international migration flows; the widening geography of international migration that involves nearly all countries of the world; qualitative changes in the structure of international migration flows; the key role of economic migration; the permanent growth and structural intricateness of irregular migration; the increasing scale and geographical widening of forced migration; the growing importance of international migration for the demographic development of the world, countries of both origin and destination. All these trends combined prove that the international migration patterns have become more complex. The author analyzes the legal framework of the international migration processes, and gives recommendations on the ways to improve the control and regulation of migration processes. Specific issues related to the social challenges of international migration are also discussed in the article. International migration has accelerated over the last fifty years. Globalization processes have set in motion vast and often uncontrolled international migration flows and, thus, turned the international migration into the most important global phenomena, which influences the world economy and international security. Today, more people live outside their countries of origin than ever before, and international migration has become much more diverse in terms of origins and destinations of migrants.
Transnational Migration Studies: Past Developments and Future Trends
Annual Review of Sociology, 2007
The past two decades have witnessed a sea change in migration scholarship. Most scholars now recognize that many contemporary migrants and their predecessors maintain various kinds of ties to their homelands at the same time that they are incorporated into the countries that receive them. Increasingly, social life takes place across borders, even as the political and cultural salience of nation-state boundaries remains strong. Transnational migration studies has emerged as an inherently interdisciplinary field, made up of scholars around the world, seeking to describe and analyze these dynamics and invent new methodological tools with which to do so. In this review, we offer a short history of theoretical developments, outlining the different ways in which scholars have defined and approached transnational migration. We then summarize what is known about migrant transnationalism in different arenas—economics, politics, the social, the cultural, and the religious. Finally, we discuss...
'Migration and international political economy'
E. Vivares (ed.) The Routledge Handbook to Global Political Economy, 2020
Labour migration has been traditionally ‘overlooked’ by ‘core IPE’ theories. Preoccupations with labour migration have been addressed in sociology, anthropology, history and economics. However, the framing of migration moved from ‘problem’ to ‘crisis’ posing constructed challenges to ideas of transnationalism and values in different regions. Why are some nation-states willing to accept high levels of migration even when it might contrast with their interests? This chapter addresses the issue of labour migration across borders from an ‘IPE standpoint’ reviewing ‘mainstream’ and ‘critical’ traditions of IPE. It concludes suggesting ways forward to develop an integrative agenda on migration within IPE as the discipline expands.
A Conceptual Map of Theories of Migration. Is Migration too Politicised or too Philosophised?
Georgiana Turculet PhD candidate at Central European University turculet.georgiana@ceu-budapest.edu Abstract When it comes to the issue of transnational migration and its normative demands on states’ borders, some theorists advocate a world of open borders, while others support the full sovereignty of states in matters of immigration. While each position offers important insights to the debate, my interest starts with acknowledging that a plausible justification for the fully fledged right of states to exclude, as well as a more nuanced reflection on how morality imposes limits on this right, are still needed. This chapter seeks to address the question of whether, and to which extent, border policy can be unilaterally set by states and on what normative grounds (compatible with liberal and democratic theories) migrants can be denied entry to countries and have their rights restricted in today’s world. Far from proposing a concrete response to this complex question, I bring forth an overview of the most recent arguments and propose ways in which the framework can be best conceptualized, as well as gaps which left unfilled will not allow a correct assessment of the issue of migration. This chapter clarifies some of the methodological tools theorists have at their disposal when addressing complex issues in the migration field (principles designed within ideal theory, nonideal theory and practical considerations, and which serve different aims). These are distinct levels of analysis that need to operate together. However, keeping them distinct is useful in order to be aware of how these levels are used to talk at cross-purposes, and furthermore to properly use the practical knowledge, often integrated into the normative desiderata. I propose the view that migration per se is not the problem that ‘upsets’ the system of states (as it is often conceptualized in real politics and academic discourse), but it is part of the system of semi-closed (or porous) communities, just like states are amongst the existing entities in the constellation of political concepts and facts out there. What is dysfunctional and problematic about migration is the way migration is taking place, namely it is overwhelmingly need-driven, as opposed to choice-driven. This fact, in combination with the response of current Western states to migration (by building fences and fortifying anti-immigration policies as well as politicising migration via anti-immigration discourse) is identified as the problem requiring further investigation and solutions.
Migration in the Age of the Nation-state: Migrants, Refugees, and the National Order of Things
2014
This article attends to the historical and contemporary relationship between migration and the global international order. It takes as its point of departure the argument that comprehensive analyses of migration must not only transcend the traditional subjects, objects, and assumptions of international relations theory, but also interrogate and historicize that which conditions the possibility of the international order, namely, the nation-state. As such, it attends to the emergence and consolidation of the international order, to the role of migration in its production, and to the manner in which it continues to structure the field and practices of migration, and conditions the possibilities of migrant populations. Thinking about migrants and refugees from an international perspective has usually entailed thinking about the technologies (the laws, statutes, and practices) that govern the crossing of internationally recognized territorial borders; thinking about trans-or international legal frameworks and conventions that attempt to govern international population movements; identifying, mapping, and analyzing migratory routes, patterns, and types; and identifying and attending to the ways in which international migration has, in the words of Stephen Castles and Mark J. Miller, reforged societies. 1 In this last instance, what is attended to is the manner in which migrants and refugees transform the economic, political, and sociocultural complexion of immigrant-receiving societies; the economic, political, and sociocultural responses of these societies to the aforesaid changes; and the ways in which the identities of the migrants and refugees and the complexions of immigrant-sending societies are likewise transformed and reforged. Taking the issue with the methodological and ontological assumptions and frameworks that guide these studies, Castles and Miller level against them the fundamental criticism that they artificially rupture and compartmentalize the ''migratory process.'' 2 In The Age of Migration: International