Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. New York: Cambridge University Press. 335 pages. ISBN 978‐1‐107‐01844‐0. $85.50. by Daniela Stockmann. 2013 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Media Oversight in Non-Democratic Regimes: The Perspectives of Officials and Journalists in China
In comparing media landscapes and practices in democratic and non-democratic regimes, a popular projection is that of a binary vision of free versus not free, sanctioning versus censorship, and objectivity versus propaganda. Global media assessment indices, which rank and sort countries into different categories of media freedom reinforce the imagery of a stark disconnect between media practices in democratic and authoritarian contexts. In contrast to democratic regimes, which populate the “free” category, authoritarian regimes, such as China, Belarus, and Zimbabwe, fall into the unfree domain and are generally associated with harsh media environments and a lack of any independent or critical voices (Freedom House Rankings 2013). The frequent focus of Western media on censorship and harassment of journalists in authoritarian regimes further highlights the gap between media practices in democratic and non-democratic contexts. In the latter, the media is projected as being entirely dominated by an all-powerful coercive state apparatus, not leaving space for alternative discourses.
Rethinking Political Economy: Implications for media and democracy in Greater China
Javnost-the Public, , 2001
Based on the evidence from Greater China, this essay proposes two theoretical propositions regarding the medias democratic potential. First, the liberalpluralist approach to political economy, with its focus on the critique of the state, may be useful in analysing the authoritarian media in Third World countries and former Communist countries; in contrast, the radical- Marxist approach, with its focus on the critique of the capital, may be used to analyse the liberal-capitalist media. Specifically, the liberal approach goes a long way toward explaining the increased degree of negative freedom for the marketised authoritarian media in China, the martial-law media in Taiwan, the Hong Kong media in the shadow of an authoritarian sovereign. Secondly, in all of the three transitional systems, in fact, both of these approaches may intertwine and coexist uneasily and paradoxically. In the PRC, the state still maintains tight reins on news media, but it must negotiate with the market forces. The relative triumph of representative democracy in Taiwan has made the liberal perspective less (albeit still enormously) relevant, while ushering in the radical approach to account for the impact of media conglomeration on limiting the range of expression. On the other hand, as Hong Kongs liberal media order and mature capitalism are being threatened, concern for media professionalism and freedom has come to the fore. Four more unresolved theoretical issues are also briefly outlined.
Censorship and Propaganda in China and Xi Jinping’s media control.doc
China is still very much a one-party state, also an authoritarian government. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) maintains tight control on political expression, speech, religion, and assembly, any social group able to organize on a large scale is deemed a threat. According to this report on the state of global press freedom from the year 2015, the Chinese government’s press restrictions are complex, intricate, and ruthless because of political reasons. It has attempted to influence public opinion through the use of state-owned traditional media outlets such as the CCTV television network or the People’s Daily newspaper. Moreover, Chinese media policy can be flexible to suit the leadership’s purposes or political ends. It is undeniable that media control is one of the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) governances. . Since Xi Jinping has assumed power in 2012-2013 as the Secretary General of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, president of China and Chairman of the Central Military Commission, there is lots of evidence indicating that media control has been tightened. It is very difficult to access more sensitive information of public affairs, For Xi Jinping, media and education is tool to control ideology, thus his policy is encapsulated in the hardline phrase “public opinion struggle,” or yulun douzheng (輿論鬥爭). It is obvious that the tension between China’s government and citizens has been sharpening during the public debates in China . Some questions that need to be asked, however, are why Xi Jinping wants to increase control and what kind of policies the CCP wants to enact in this period? China has a huge influence and power in the world, especially in the economic sector, but the Chinese government has long kept tight reins on both traditional and new media. How does the Chinese government exercise its variety of mechanisms to pressure and influence communications, demonstrate intolerance of political opinions and autonomous mobilization?
Editorial: From Control to Negotiation: Chinese Media in the 2000s
International Communication Gazette, 2007
As China is seen to rise as a major power in the global economy and politics, there has been growing academic interest in the country’s changing media landscape. It is, however, never an easy task to read media systems in a post-Communist market authoritarian society like China. Students of Chinese media studies are often excited by the rapid growth and commercialization of the media industry, on the one hand, and puzzled and frustrated by its lack of press freedom and professionalism, on the other hand. This special issue of The International Communication Gazette wishes to contribute to the current academic debate on the Chinese media by identifying and focusing on some of the most recent changes in this area. Before I introduce the four articles collected in this special issue in some detail, it is useful to undertake a critical analysis of the main theoretical frameworks that have been used to understand the Chinese media ‘puzzle’ in recent research literature, and explore the possibility of developing new ones.
Controlling the Chinese Media: An Uncertain Business
Increasing economic liberalization of the Chinese media has not resulted in proportional political liberalization, and previous explanations for the state’s puzzlingly firm grip are inadequate. This article argues that a “regime of uncertainty” is critical toward keeping the Chinese media in line.
Pacific Journalism Review : Te Koakoa
This project captured and analysed Chinese strategies seeking to influence global media in its coverage of China. While there is ample literature defining some of these strategies, there is a lack of empirical data tracking the strategies in practice. The project addressed this by surveying officials from journalism unions in 87 countries on their perceptions of Chinese influence on the media in their country. The surveys were complemented by focus groups with senior journalists and editors in six countries. The findings illustrated how China’s global media outreach policies have grown increasingly sophisticated and how the country utilises a multi-pronged approach to influence global media. Dukalskis’ (2017) authoritarian public sphere (APS) framework was used to conceptualise the studies and to analyse the findings. It is argued that China is attempting to offer its APS as an alternative to the traditional Habermasian (1989) public sphere.
SPEAK NO EVIL MASS MEDIA CONTROL IN CONTEMPORARY CHINA
2006
In the present era of globalization, access to information and the technology for disseminating it are taking enormous leaps forward. These profound advances, embodied in the Internet, have enabled millions of average citizens, businesses, and nongovernmental organizations to share ideas in a manner unthinkable even a generation ago.
Communication among human beings is essential is promoting peaceful co-existence. The access to information plays a crucial role in empowering peoples as the saying goes ‘information is power.' The media has been at the forefront in collecting and disseminating information. However, the media outlets in different countries function differently in different societies depending on the social, political, and religious set ups. This paper analyzes the media operations in China. It encompasses the historical background, the current state, the statistics, and the political influence of media in China