Specificity of DNA–Protein Interactions within Transcription Complexes of Escherichia coli (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Synthetic 75-base pair promoters bearing base changes and/or base analog substitutions at selected positions were constructed. Using both abortive initiation and run-off transcription assays, the interaction of these altered promoters with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase was studied in order to determine the involvement of DNA functional groups in promoter recognition. Two adjacent thymines in the -35 region were identified whose 5-methyl groups play a crucial role. Additionally, the combined results from several substitution experiments showed that functional groups in the major groove of the strongly conserved T-A base pair at the -7 position are probable sites of direct interaction with RNA polymerase.
RNA-polymerase binding at the promoters of the rRNA genes of Escherichia coli
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Nucleic Acids and Protein Synthesis, 1980
The promoter region of two bacterial rRNA genes was investigated by electron-microscopic analysis of polymerase binding, transcription initiation and nitrocellulose filtration of RNA-polymerase-DNA complexes, using restriction endonuclease generated fragments of recombinant plasmids and a transducing phage. The following observations have been made: 1. Two transcription initiation sites have been located approximately 200 and 300 base pairs upstream from the beginning of the sequence coding for mature 16 S rRNA. 2. Polymerase binding at these sites can be observed electronmicroscopically and a 360 base-pair fragment containing these sites binds to nitrocellulose in the presence of RNA-polymerase. This complex dissociates even at moderately high (0.1-0.2 M) salt concentrations. Although transcription initiation is reported to be more frequent at the first of these sites, the binding is much stronger at the second site. 3. In the case of the rrnD gene, BamHI cleaves a few base pairs upstream from the first transcription start site. This cleavage destroys polymerase binding at this site but does not influence binding at the second site. 4. At higher polymerase/DNA ratio four weak but distinct and regularly spaced binding sites can be observed preceding the two initiation sites at approximately 1000, 820, 640 and 440 base pairs before the mature 16 S rRNA sequence. 5. An extremely strong binding site is located about 1300 base pairs upstream from the beginning of the 16 S rRNA sequence. Very little (if any) initiation occurs at this site. The possibility is discussed that the noninitiating binding sites preceding the two transcription start points might functionally belong to the promoter region.
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1999
A cysteine-tethered DNA cleavage agent has been used to locate the position of region 2.5 of 70 in transcriptionally competent complexes between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and promoters. In this study we have engineered 70 to introduce a unique cysteine residue at a number of positions in region 2.5. Mutant proteins were purified, and in each case, the single cysteine residue used as the target for covalent coupling of the DNA cleavage agent p-bromoacetamidobenzyl-EDTA⅐Fe (FeBABE). RNA polymerase core reconstituted with tagged derivatives was shown to be transcriptionally active. Hydroxyl radical-based DNA cleavage mediated by tethered FeBABE was observed for each derivative of RNA polymerase in the open complex. Our results show that region 2.5 is in close proximity to promoter DNA just upstream of the ؊10 hexamer. This positioning is independent of promoter sequence. A model for the interaction of this region of with promoter DNA is discussed.
Journal of Biosciences, 1993
Search for a promoter element by RNA polymerase from the extremely large DNA base sequence is thought to be the slowest and rate-determining for the regulation of transcription process. Few direct experiments we described here which have tried to follow the mechanistic implications of this promoter search. However, once the promoter is located, transcription complex, constituting mainly the RNA polymerase molecule and few transcription factors has to unidirectionally clear the promoter and elongate the RNA chain through a series of steps which altogether define the initiation of transcription process. Thus, it appears that the promoter sequence acts as a trap for RNA polymerase associated with a large binding constant, although to clear the promoter and to elongate the transcript such energy barrier has to be overcome. Topological state of the DNA, particularly in the neighbourhood of the promoter plays an important role in the energetics of the whole process.
European Journal of Biochemistry, 1986
DNA-dependent RNA polymerase in complex with a DNA fragment was analyzed by electrophoresis in nondenaturing gels as core enzyme, holoenzyme, during initiation and elongation. The DNA fragment carried the promoter A1 of the phage T7. The stoichiometry between holoenzyme and promoter and between CJ and core enzyme in complex with DNA was determined. Holoenzyme bound as a monomer to the DNA, whereas core enzyme formed aggregates before binding to the DNA. If the molar ratio of holoenzyme to DNA exceeded 0.5: 1 a second holoenzyme molecule interacted with the DNA fragment with diminished affinity. A large difference in the frictional coefficient of the holoenzyme-promoter and the core enzyme-DNA complex indicated a drastic conformational difference between the two types of complexes. The stability of the holoenzyme-promoter complex decreased with decreasing temperature, accompanied by at least partial dissociation of holoenzyme into core enzyme and CJ factor. Addition of nucleoside triphosphates did not change the electrophoretic mobility of the complex if abortive transcription only was allowed, but increased it after addition of all four nucleoside triphosphates owing to release of the CJ factor.
Journal of Molecular Biology, 2011
Initiation of RNA synthesis from DNA templates by RNA polymerase (RNAP) is a multi-step process, in which initial recognition of promoter DNA by RNAP triggers a series of conformational changes in both RNAP and promoter DNA. The bacterial RNAP functions as a molecular isomerization machine, using binding free energy to remodel the initial recognition complex, placing downstream duplex DNA in the active site cleft and then separating the nontemplate and template strands in the region surrounding the start site of RNA synthesis. In this initial unstable "open" complex the template strand appears correctly positioned in the active site. Subsequently, the nontemplate strand is repositioned and a clamp is assembled on duplex DNA downstream of the open region to form the highly stable open complex, RP o . The transcription initiation factor, σ 70 , plays critical roles in promoter recognition and RP o formation as well as in early steps of RNA synthesis.
Nucleic Acids Research, 1997
The C-terminal domain (CTD) downstream from residue 235 of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase α subunit is involved in recognition of the promoter UP element. Here we have demonstrated, by DNase I and hydroxyl radical mapping, the presence of two UP element subsites on the promoter D of phage T7, each located half and one-and-a-half helix turns, respectively, upstream from the promoter -35 element. This non-typical UP element retained its αCTD-binding capability when transferred into the genetic environment of the rrnBP1 basic promoter, leading to transcription stimulation as high as the typical rrnBP1 UP element. Chemical protease FeBABE conjugated to αCTD S309C efficiently attacked the T7D UP element but not the rrnBP1 UP element. After alanine scanning, most of the amino acid residues that were involved in rrnBP1 interaction were also found to be involved in T7D UP element recognition, but alanine substitution at three residues had the opposite effect on the transcription activation between rrnBP1 and T7D promoters. Mutation E286A stimulated T7D transcription but inhibited rrnBP1 RNA synthesis, while L290A and K304A stimulated transcription from rrnBP1 but not the T7D promoter. Taken together, we conclude that although the overall sets of amino acid residues responsible for interaction with the two UP elements overlap, the mode of αCTD interaction with T7D UP element is different from that with rrnBP1 UP element, involving different residues on helices III and IV.
Promoter recognition by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase
Journal of Molecular Biology, 1989
The available evidence suggests that during the process of formation of a functional or "open" complex at a promoter, Escherichia coli RNA polymerase transiently realigns the two contacted regions of the promoter, thus stressing the intervening spacer DNA. We tested the possibility that this process plays an active role in the formation of an open complex. Two series of promoters were examined: one with spacer DNAs of 15 to 19 basepairs and a derivative for which the promoters additionally contained a one-base gap in the spacer, so as to relieve any stress imposed on the DNA. Consistent with an active role for the stressed DNA in driving open complex formation, we have found that for promoters with a 17-base-pair spacer, the presence of a gap leads to a delay in the formation of an open complex, at a step subsequent to the initial binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter. The results with the other gapped promoters rule out direct binding of RNA polymerase to the region of the gap and indicate an increased flexibility in the gapped DNA. As not all observations with the spacer length series of gapped and ungapped promoters can be interpreted in terms of an active role of the spacer DNA without additional assumptions, such a role must still be considered tentative.
Journal of Biological Chemistry
The rrnB P1 promoter of Escherichia coli (starting sequence C"4-A"S-C"2-C"1-A+1-C+2-U+3-G+4) forms a binary complex with RNA polymerase that is highly unstable and requires the presence of transcription substrates ATP and CTP for stabilizing the enzyme-DNA association (Gourse, R. L. (1988) Nucleic Acids Rea. 16,9789-9809). We show that in the absence of UTP and GTP the stabilization is accomplished by short RNA oligomers synthesized in an unusual "-3+ " mode whereby the primer initiated at the +1 site presumably slips back by three nucleotides into the -3 site and is then extended yielding stable ternary complexes. By contrast, short oligomers initiated in the conventional "+1+" mode without slippage do not exert the stabilization effect and are readily aborted from the promoter complex. The stable -3-ternary complexes carry u factor but otherwise resemble elongation complexes in their high salt stability and in the fact that they are formed with a mutant RNA polymerase deficient in promoter binding. A model is proposed explaining the stability of the -3+ ternary complexes by RNA slipping into a putative "tight RNA binding site" in RNA polymerase which is normally occupied by RNA during elongation.
Genes & development, 2003
The C-terminal domain of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) alpha subunit (alphaCTD) stimulates transcription initiation by interacting with upstream (UP) element DNA and a variety of transcription activators. Here we identify specific substitutions in region 4.2 of sigma 70 (sigma(70)) and in alphaCTD that decrease transcription initiation from promoters containing some, but not all, UP elements. This decrease in transcription derives from a decrease in the initial equilibrium constant for RNAP binding (K(B)). The open complexes formed by the mutant and wild-type RNAPs differ in DNAse I sensitivity at the junction of the alphaCTD and sigma DNA binding sites, correlating with the differences in transcription. A model of the DNA-alphaCTD-sigma region 4.2 ternary complex, constructed from the previously determined X-ray structures of the Thermus aquaticus sigma region 4.2-DNA complex and the E. coli alphaCTD-DNA complex, indicates that the residues identified by mutation in si...