US-guided peripheral vascular interventions, comments on the EFSUMB guidelines (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of thoracic disease, 2016
Central venous access has traditionally been performed on the basis of designated anatomical landmarks. However, due to patients' individual anatomy and vessel pathology and depending on individual operators' skill, this landmark approach is associated with a significant failure rate and complication risk. There is substantial evidence demonstrating significant improvement in effectiveness and safety of vascular access by realtime ultrasound (US)-guidance, as compared to the anatomical landmark-guided approach. This review comments on the evidence-based recommendations on US-guided vascular access which have been published recently within the framework of Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (InVUS) of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) from a clinical practice point of view.
Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access: Is it the standard of care
Venous access or cannulation is the most common invasive procedure being performed in the hospitals. It may appear very simple and straight forward routine, but every one of us has encountered a situation when, due to any one or multiple causes, we feel it almost impossible to gain access. It is here that ultrasound comes into play. Although original cost and lack of training have limited its acceptance for wide spread use in all departments of a hospital, the advantages offered by it, will soon overcome the obstacles and will become the standard of care as far as peripheral or central venous access is concerned. This editorial highlights the difficulties and the scope of this new tool in ER, ICU and OR.
The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2010
e Abstract-Background: Traditionally, Emergency Physicians (EPs) have used the external jugular (EJ) vein to gain vascular access in patients who have failed nursing attempts at peripheral access. Recently, some EPs have used ultrasound (USIV) to gain peripheral access. Study Objective: This study seeks to determine which initial approach by EPs would lead to greater success. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized study of all adult patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) between June and December 2007. Inclusion criteria were failed nursing attempts at peripheral access (at least three). EPs were 2 nd -or 3 rd -year residents who had previously performed more than five each of EJs and USIVs. Patients were randomized into either an initial EJ or USIV approach. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled, 32 in the ultrasound group, 28 in the EJ group. Fifteen different EPs performed access. Initial Success: USIV 84% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68 -93%) vs. EJ 50% (95% CI 33-67%), p ؍ 0.006. Success if EJ visible: USIV 84% vs. EJ 66% (p ؍ 0.18). Overall success, including data from the crossover pathway: a total of 41 lines were successfully placed by ultrasound out of 46 attempts (89%) vs. 18 out of 33 for EJ (55%), p ؍ 0.001. In total, 59/60 patients (98%) had a peripheral i.v. successfully placed. The percentage of functioning lines when the patient left the ED was: USIV 89% (95% CI 72-96%) vs. EJ 93% (95% CI 68 -98%), p ؍ 0.88. Conclusion: As an initial approach to all patients with difficult venous access, ultrasound-guided peripheral lines are superior to the EJ approach. However if the EJ was visible, there was no difference in success among the initial approaches. Both techniques, when used together, could achieve peripheral vascular access in 98% of difficult access patients.
A new device for ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access
The journal of vascular access, 2018
In patients with difficult peripheral venous access, alternative techniques require expertise and are invasive, expensive, and prone to serious adverse events. This brought us to designing a new venous catheter (JLB® Deltamed, Inc.) for the cannulation of medium and large bore veins; it is echogenic, and available in different lengths (60 / 70 / 80 mm) and Gauges (14 / 16 / 17 / 18). We led a multi-center observational convenience sampling study to evaluate safety and effectiveness of JLB. Data was collected from June 2015 to February 2018. Inclusion criteria were age ⩾ 18, difficulty in obtaining superficial venous access in the veins of the arm, need for rapid infusion, or patient's preference. We enrolled 1000 patients, mean age 66.8 years. In total, 951 (95.1%) had the device placed in internal jugular vein, 28 in basilic or cephalic vein, 15 in femoral vein, 5 in axillary vein (infra-clavicular tract), and 1 in the external jugular vein. The procedure was performed by atten...
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 2021
Background and Aims: Posterior vessel wall puncture (PVWP) is a common complication of ultrasound (US) guided central venous cannulation. We evaluated and compared the frequency of PWVP of internal jugular vein using short axis (SA) and long axis (LA) approach of US-guided needle cannulation. As a secondary objective incidence of carotid puncture was assessed. Material and Methods: Prospective, single-blinded, cross over, observational study at Urban Level I Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care Department. Residents receiving standard education on ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation were asked to place an US-guided catheter using either short axis or long axis approach on a human torso mannequin. During the procedure, the path of the needle was carefully observed by the investigator for any PVWP and carotid puncture without interference with the placement procedure. The confidence level of the resident for the intraluminal placement of the needle tip was measured on a 10-point Likert scale. Results: Forty residents participated in the study. The incidence of PVWP in SA and LA group was 40% and 17.5% respectively and was statistically significant (p = 0.026). There was no incidence of carotid artery puncture in either of the group. The mean confidence of intraluminal placement of needle was significantly higher in the LA group (8.32) as compared to the SA group (5.95). Conclusion: Lower incidence of PVWP was seen in LA as compared to the SA approach during US-guided IJV cannulation in phantom in residents having previous experience of CVC (central venous cannulation) in landmark technique only. Participants were more confident about intraluminal needle placement in the LA group compared to the SA group.
Ultrasound guidance for radial arterial puncture: a randomized controlled trial
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2013
Study Objective and Background: Arterial puncture for blood gas analysis is a frequent procedure and could be difficult in the emergency setting. The aim of the study was to compare ultrasonographically guided arterial radial puncture vs conventional sampling. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, randomized study. The inclusion criteria are all patients needing arterial blood gas at admission in the emergency unit. The exclusion criteria are the following: Hallen test positive, local sepsis, local trauma, known sever local arteriopathy, refusal of consent by the patient, participation in another study, and cardiac arrest. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: radial arterial puncture obtained through an ultrasonographically guided technique (group 1) or radial arterial puncture by conventional method (group 2). The main objective is the number of attempts after enrollment. The secondary objectives are time to success, patient satisfaction and pain, and physician satisfaction. Immediate complications were collected. Groups were compared with nonparametric analysis. Results: The data were usable for 72 of 74 patients included. Lung disease (acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pneumonia) at 45% (n = 32) and suspicion of pulmonary embolism in 31% (n = 22) were the most common reasons. Demographics data were comparable in the 2 groups. In group 1, the number of attempts significantly increased 2.35 [1-3] vs 1.66 [1-2] [P = .017]), and the sample was 2.4 times longer (132 seconds [50-200] vs 55 [20-65] [P b .01] by standard method). There was no significant difference in terms of pain (visual analog scale [VAS], 3.6 [2-5] for both groups [P = .743]), patient satisfaction (VAS, 7.2 [5-9] vs 6.8 [5-9] [P = .494]), and physician satisfaction (VAS, 6.0 [3.5-8] vs 6.9 [5-9] [P = .233]). No immediate complications were found in the 2 groups.
The journal of vascular access, 2017
Centrally inserted central catheter (CICC) insertion is a commonly performed procedure that may give rise to different complications. Despite the suggestion of guidelines to use ultrasound guidance (USG) for vascular access, not all centers use it systematically. The aim of this study is to illustrate the experience with ultrasound in CICC placement at a high-volume oncological center, in a country where the landmark technique is standard. Retrospective analysis of a prospective database was performed on CICC placement under USG in the Central Venous Catheter Unit of Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, from 2012 to 2015. Three thousand five hundred and seventy-two procedures were recorded. From 2728 CICC placements, 1187 (43.5%) were done using USG. The majority of CICC placements were successful without immediate complications (96.1%). In 55 cases (4.6%), more than three attempts were necessary to puncture the vein. Pneumothorax occurred in 5 cases (0.4%) a...
Ultrasound for peripheral and arterial access
Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 2019
Peripheral venous access is perhaps the most commonly performed procedure in hospitals, urgent care, or surgical centers across the country. The ability to obtain peripheral intravenous (IV) access, and in a timely manner, is arguably one of the most important skill sets to be mastered by health care professionals. While skill and experience play a role in successful and timely vascular access, numerous patient factors such as obesity, diabetes, IV drug use, and chronic kidney disease may pose unique challenges to even the most skilled health care professional. In patients with difficult access, there are often multiple attempts, which can be both time consuming for the provider and painful for the patients. Direct visualization of blood vessels using ultrasonography has an advantage over the standard landmark technique and can improve the success rate of peripheral IV or arterial line placement in this patient population. Given the success of ultrasound guidance with access placement, it is imperative that all health care profesionals become proficient with this technique. The aim of this review article is to provide concise and practical information on the basics of ultrasound and its application to obtain peripheral venous and arterial access.