Platońskie podłoże językowe Księgi Rodzaju 1-2 w wersji Septuaginty? Wstępna próba rewizji pewnej teorii (Platonic pattern of the phraseology of Genesis 1-2 LXX revisited), USS 19 (2021), 121-141 (original) (raw)

2021, U schyłku starożytności. Studia źródłoznawcze

In 1994 Martin Rösel tried to demonstrate the influence of Platonic phraseology on the Greek text of the opening chapters of Genesis (LXX Genesis 1–11, Rösel: Übersetzung als Vollendung des Auslegung). The paper attempts to take up anew the question of the possible hints of Platonic language in Genesis 1–2 LXX. The author argues that at least three examples already pointed out by Rösel seem to be best explained as the adaptation of the phraseology of Plato indeed (Gen 1.2: ἀόρατος καὶ ἀκατασκεύαστος – Plat. Tim. 50d–51a: ἂν παρεσκευασμένον εὖ / ἀνόρατον εἶδός τι καὶ ἄμορφον; Gen 1.4f ὅτι καλόν; Plat., Tim. 28a, 29a: καλὸν ἐξ ἀνάγκης, καλός ἐστιν ὅδε ὁ κόσμος; Gen 1.26–27: κατ᾽ εἰκόνα … καθ᾽ ὁμοίωσιν [θεοῦ]; Plat. Tim. 39B: εἰκόνα τινὸς εἶναι, Plat. Theaet. 176b: ὁμοίωσις θεῷ). He adds, however, two further possible instances of such phraseological influence (Gen 1.1: ἐποίησεν ὁ θεός – Plat. Tim. 31a: ἐποίησεν ὁ ποιῶν, Gen 2.24: δύο εἰς … μίαν – Plat. Symp. 191d: ἓν ἐκ δυοῖν). It seems reasonable to argue that the translators of Septuagint consciously applied Platonic phraseology, which they borrowed from the cosmological imaginary (especially from Timaeus), as the best Greek equivalent of certain Hebrew expressions. Possible linguistic borrowing however did not necessarily mean, as Rösel believed, any serious “implementation” of Platonic doctrine into the Biblical text, maybe except the idea of original complementarity of man and woman in Gen 2.24 (cf. Symp. 192e) virtually absent in the Hebrew version.

O odmianie środowiskowej języka księży – propozycja badawcza

JĘZYK POLSKI – MIĘDZY TRADYCJĄ A WSPÓŁCZESNOŚCIĄ. Księga jubileuszowa z okazji stulecia Towarzystwa Miłośników Języka Polskiego, 2021

The Language of Priests: A Pilot Study Summary The article presents and briefly discusses the results from a survey conducted with 28 Roman Catholic priests and clerics who were asked about the vocabulary used in everyday communication. About 370 slang word and phrases where collected in this way. Based on the answers provided, it can be assumed that language used by priests in private situations is characterized by expression, humor and creativity.

Dlaczego słowotwórstwo leksykalistyczne? : ogląd faktów diachronicznych

2007

The paper raises the problem of the status of word formation facts in a comprehensive description of the language. The author, referring to a discussion that has been going on for several years concerning the morphological or lexical character of derivates, presents additional arguments showing that word formation should be included in lexicology. The basis of this research are historical and linguistic facts certified in Old Polish dictionaries. On the example of lexicalization and tautology phenomena present in ancient Polish language the author tries to point out the groups of derivate lexemes that should also undergo a lexicological analysis

Ottuv slovnik naucny na tle czeskiej tradycji leksykograficznej : encyklopedia - twórcy - język

2013

Ottův slovník naučný [J. Otto’s Scientific Dictionary] (OSN, 1888–1909) and its continuation – the unfinished Ottův slovník naučný nové doby [J. Otto’s Scientific Dictionary of the New Era] (OSNND, 1930–1943) is one of the most prominent works of not only Czech and Czechoslovak encyclopaedic lexicography, but also an outstanding lexicographic enterprise of modern European encyclopaedic studies. At the same time, it is also “the mother of all books” or a master book not only for almost every educated Czech who reaches for it while seeking or verifying his or her own knowledge, but also for each Slavist – and especially so for a Czech, Slovak or even Polish philologist. This book is an item which cannot be missing from any reference library, as not many nations can pride themselves on such a multidimensional and reliable source of knowledge about the Slavs and (not only) Slavonic Europe at the turn of the 19th and 20th century and in the interwar period. The author of this study consi...

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.