Globalisation and the Middle East (original) (raw)
Related papers
Globalism, Regionalism and the Middle East
2020
Regionalism and globalism are two of the leading phenomena in world politics. In the age of globalism, regionalism can be treated as a complementary and interacting phenomenon – or as a competing and conflicting one. Globalization creates powerful demands for regionalism that are not particular to one specific region, but to all regions. Considering the global-regional nexus as an unavoidably synchronized and complimentary set of processes concerning the Middle East, the chapter primarily draws attention to the state of regionalism in the Arab Middle East and its spillovers. With nationalist and protectionist trends on the rise with the election of Donald Trump in the US and the UK’s Brexit decision, it is perhaps not a popular time for commenting on the state of regionalism in the Middle East. A scarcity of regional cooperation in the area has also led interested commentators and scholars to label the Middle East as “the region without regionalism” (Aarts 1999, 91) or a space of we...
Globalization and Middle East: The economic dimension
THE MALOPOLSKA SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS IN TARNÓW RESEARCH PAPERS COLLECTION, 2013
In the last part of the 20th century and in the beginning of the 21st century, a popu- larized and equally controversial phenomenon has marked, and has had a great impact on soci- eties, that is named globalization, which has occupied discussions related to the current world economy, world politics, local problems and responses. Globalization has increased contact among the peoples of the world, a rapid expansion of interdependence among nations; and we have witnessed an explosion of new actors in international affairs. There are many definitions, opinions and dimensions of globalization. Yet, for the purpose of this study, the paper will try to analyze the economic domain rather than political and cultural dimensions of this popular phe- nomenon with particular reference to Middle Eastern countries. Economic and financial globali- zation and the expansion of world trade have brought substantial benefits but also inequalities to countries around the world. In the framework of this argument, the paper analyzes the concept of globalization and processes of globalization particularly focusing them from economic perspec- tive. It then concerns with the effects of the economic globalization in Middle East region, and argues the main impediments for greater integration into global economy.
Course Overview: Globalisation in the Middle East Pristina International Summer School, Kosovo, 2015
The aim is to acquaint you with the dynamics and main trends and events in the International Politics of the Middle East in the context of a globalised world. It is intended to help you explore whether and how particular International Relations approaches may be applied to the Middle East. You will explore the range of views held by different authors and will be encouraged both to engage critically with them and develop your own positions.
Middle Eastern Exceptionalism: Globalization and the Balance of Power
Democracy and Security, 2009
The debate over ‘Middle Eastern exceptionalism’ has encompassed various contested views regarding the phenomenal failure of Middle Eastern states to democratize. International Relations theorists have turned particular attention to the Middle Eastern exceptionalism theory following the end of Cold War era during which Middle Eastern states showed resiliency to a perceived epoch of great global liberal transformations. This paper examines the Middle Eastern exceptionalism thesis and the shortfalls of liberal international relations views. Contrary to most accepted globalization notions, this paper claims that global economic liberalization has strengthened the position of Middle Eastern states over society. It argues that the combination of global economic liberalization and regional balance of power has consolidated regimes’ grip on power and undermined pressure for regime change, contributing further to the exceptional nature of Middle Eastern states. This proposition is examined by undertaking two contemporary cases of global and regional developments that are claimed to have undermined transformation momentum, namely, the worldwide market financial crisis of 2008-2009 and the Israeli-Iranian power rivalry.
Globalization has been internalized in Arabic as "awlaama" [1] and refers to the spread throughout the globe of ideas, customs, institutions, and attitudes originated in one part of the world [2] which are
Why Has Globalization Eluded the Middle East?; Strategic Insights, v. 3 issue 12 (December 2004)
2004
Many people believe economic growth, development, and job creation in the Muslim world could help drain support from radical and fundamentalist groups. Few seem willing to do much about it.[1]-Edward Gesser The notion that the poor countries of the world can in any reasonable interval achieve rich-country incomes without trade and capital flows is utterly implausible. If the poor countries of the world have to depend on themselves for the saving to finance the investment that they need, or have to develop themselves the skills and technology they need to become rich by our standards, its going to take forever.[2]-Nobel Laureate Robert Solow
A Nation Called the Middle East: In Middle Eastern Internationalism
Journal of Iranian International Legal Studies (IIntbar), 2024
The Middle East, historically encompassing territories from Palestine to the regions near India, includes vast lands such as Lebanon and Syria, once integral to the Roman Empire. The remnants of Aladdin Keykubat's castle in Alanya and the Achaemenid ruins in Cappadocia, now in modernday Turkey, underscore the region's deep historical significance, marked by a cohesive genetic, cultural, and historical identity. Yet, despite this unity, the Middle East remains one of the most politically fragmented and sectarian regions globally, plagued by internal conflicts and external interventions. This article examines the historical unity and subsequent political fragmentation of the Middle East, with a focus on religious sectarianism, colonialism, modern nationalism, and genetic commonalities. It also discusses the potential for fostering Internationalist ideology in the region, starting with economic, trade, and tourism cooperation.