Advancing the interdisciplinary dialogue on climate justice (original) (raw)

Abstract

Climate change is an extraordinary, multi-faceted challenge for mankind and the scale of the challenge is reflected in the breadth and depth of issues of justice it confronts us with (Gardiner et al. 2010). First of all, given the long time spans involved, this includes questions of intergenerational justice (Page 2007): Since a large share of the effect of present emissions will only arise after a significant time lag, it is necessary to consider what type and level of climate actions we owe our descendants. Such a discussion on intergenerational justice necessitates, in turn, extensive debates about risk: Given that there is and will always remain significant scientific uncertainty about the precise future effect of present emissions, determining appropriate margins of safety is crucial (Gardiner 2006; Hartzell-Nichols 2013). Of course, our descendants are not the only relevant stakeholder in these debates: Effects of climate change on the present generation, on animals, and on the rest of nature are grounds for climate action as well (Palmer 2011; Nolt 2011). Another issue of concern is rather about justice within the present generation, as decisions to be made not only involve the overall amount of climate action, but they also need to answer the question on how to split up the burden of taking this action (Caney 2012; Miller 2009). Given that emissions do not respect borders, this means allocating responsibility for climate action on a global scale. Seeking global justice in mitigation, adaptation, and loss and damage is particularly relevant given that many of the more vulnerable countries have comparatively lower (historical and current) per capita emissions and lower capacity to address the problem. While these larger questions of intergenerational and intragenerational justice make up the core of the ethical challenge of climate change, climate change brings up a host of further ethical issues, for example moral aspects of policy instrument choice (such as population control, market measures, or lifestyle changes), This article is part of a Special Issue on "Climate Justice in Interdisciplinary Research" edited by Christian Huggel, Markus Ohndorf, Dominic Roser, and Ivo Wallimann-Helmer.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (43)

  1. Betz G (2015) Factual and normative dissent in media debates about climate policy. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/ s10584-015-1489-9
  2. Betzold C (2015) Adapting to climate change in small island developing states. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/ s10584-015-1408-0
  3. Brooks T (2015) Climate change justice through Taxation? Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1496-x Caney S (2012) Just emissions. Philos Public Aff 40(4):255-300. doi:10.1111/papa.12005
  4. Caney S, Hepburn C (2011) Carbon trading: unethical, unjust and ineffective? R Inst Philos Suppl 69:201-234. doi:10.1017/S1358246111000282
  5. Capstick S, Whitmarsh L, Poortinga W, et al. (2015) International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 6:35-61. doi:10.1002/wcc.321
  6. Friman M, Hjerpe M (2015) Agreement, significance, and understandings of historical responsibility in climate change negotiations. Clim Pol 15(3):302-320. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.916598
  7. Gardiner SM (2006) A core precautionary principle. J Polit Philos 14(1):33-60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006. 00237.x Gardiner SM (2011) A perfect moral storm: the ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  8. Gardiner S, Caney S, Jamieson D, Shue H (eds) (2010) Climate ethics: essential readings. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  9. Hartzell-Nichols L (2013) From 'the' precautionary principle to precautionary principles. Ethics, Policy & Environment 16(3):308-320. doi:10.1080/21550085.2013.844569
  10. Hirsch Hadorn G, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol Econ 60(1):119-128. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002
  11. Huggel C, Stone D, Eicken H, Hansen G (2015) Potential and limitations of the attribution of climate change impacts for informing loss and damage discussions and policies. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015- 1441-z Hulme M (2014) Attributing weather extremes to Bclimate change^a review. Prog Phys Geogr 499-511. doi:10. 1177/0309133314538644
  12. Hulme M, O'Neill SJ, Dessai S (2011) Is weather event attribution necessary for adaptation funding? Science 334:764-765. doi:10.1126/science.1211740
  13. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge IPCC (2014) In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. part a: global and sectoral aspects. contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  14. Jurt C, Burga M, Vicuña L, Huggel C, Orlove B (2015) Local perceptions in climate change debates: insights from case studies in the Alps and the Andes. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1529-5
  15. Keohane R, Lane M, Oppenheimer M (2014) The ethics of scientific communication under uncertainty. Pol Phil Econ 13(4):343-368. doi:10.1177/1470594X14538570
  16. Knutti R, Rogelj J (2015) The legacy of our CO2 emissions: a clash of scientific facts, politics and ethics. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1340-3
  17. McKinnon C (2015) Climate justice in a carbon budget. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1382-6
  18. Meinshausen M, Meinshausen N, Hare W, Raper SCB, Frieler K, Knutti R, Frame DJ, Allen MR (2009) Greenhouse gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 458:1158-1162. doi:10.1038/ nature08017
  19. Mera R, Massey N, Rupp DE, Mote P, Allen M, Frumhoff PC (2015) Climate change, climate justice and the application of probabilistic event attribution to summer heat extremes in the California central valley. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1474-3
  20. Michaelowa K, Michaelowa A (2015) Do rapidly developing countries take up new responsibilities for climate change mitigation? Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1528-6
  21. Miller D (2009) Global justice and climate change: how should responsibilities be distributed? Parts I and II. Tanner Lectures on Human Values 28:119-156
  22. Myers TA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, et al. (2013) The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat Clim Chang 3:343-347. doi:10.1038/nclimate1754
  23. Nolt J (2011) Nonanthropocentric climate ethics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2(5):701-711. doi:10.1002/ wcc.131
  24. Ohndorf M, Blasch J, Schubert R (2015) Emission budget approaches for burden sharing: some thoughts from an environmental economics point of view. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1442-y
  25. Okereke C (2010) Climate justice and the international regime. WIREs Clim Change 1:462-474. doi:10.1002/ wcc.52
  26. Page EA (2007) Climate change, justice and future generations. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham Pall P, Aina T, Stone DA, et al. (2011) Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000. Nature 470:382-385. doi:10.1038/nature09762
  27. Palmer C (2011) Does nature matter? The place of the non-human in the ethics of climate change. In: Arnold D (ed) The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 272-291
  28. Parks B, Roberts JT (2006) Environmental and ecological justice. In: Betsill MM, Hochstetler K, Stevis D (eds) International environmental politics. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 329-360
  29. Patt AG, Weber EU (2014) Perceptions and communication strategies for the many uncertainties relevant for climate policy. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5:219-232. doi:10.1002/wcc.259
  30. Roser D, Seidel C (2015) Ethik des klimawandels: eine einführung. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt
  31. Schmidt A, Schäfer MS (2015) Constructions of climate justice in German, Indian and US media. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1488-x
  32. Schuppert F, Seidel C (2015) Equality, justice and feasibility: an ethical analysis of the WBGU's budget approach. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1409-z
  33. Shue H (1992) The unavoidability of justice. In: Hurrell A, Kingsbury B (eds) International politics of the environment: actors interests and institutions. Clarendon Press, Oxford
  34. Stone D, Auffhammer M, Carey M, et al. (2013) The challenge to detect and attribute effects of climate change on human and natural systems. Clim Chang 121:381-395. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0873-6
  35. Thompson A, Otto FEL (2015) Ethical and normative implications of weather event attribution for policy discussions concerning loss and damage. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1433-z UNFCCC (2011) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010: Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its sixteenth session, FCCC/CP/2010/7, March 15
  36. UNFCCC (2012) A literature review on the topics in the context of thematic area 2 of the work programme on loss and damage: a range of approaches to address loss and damage associated with the adverse effects of climate change, FCCC/SBI/2012/INF14, Nov. 15
  37. UNFCCC (2013) Non-economic losses: technical paper, FCCC/TP/2013/2, Oct.
  38. UNFCCC (2014) Report of the conference of the parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013: Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its nineteenth session, FCCC/CP/ 2013/10, Jan 31
  39. Wallimann-Helmer I (2013) The republican tragedy of the commons: the inefficiency of democracy in the light of climate change. Ancilla Iuris 1-14
  40. Wallimann-Helmer I (2015a) The liberal tragedy of the commons: the deficiency of democracy in a changing climate. In: Birnbacher D, Thorseth M (eds) The politics of sustainability. Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp. 20-35
  41. Wallimann-Helmer I (2015b) Justice for climate loss and damage. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1483-2
  42. Weber RH (2015) Border tax adjustment -legal perspective. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1414-2
  43. Zellentin A (2015) Climate justice, small island developing states & cultural loss. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/ s10584-015-1410-6