Prosecuting terrorism: the Old Bailey versus Belmarsh (original) (raw)

The re-emergence of criminal prosecution in the UK’s counter-terrorism framework is examined, contrasting the reliance on executive measures like detention without trial and control orders post-9/11. By analyzing recent legislative trends, the paper highlights a shift towards endorsing individual accountability and due process, while also acknowledging the challenges of preventing terrorist acts before they occur. Ultimately, the implications for the future of criminal justice in the context of terrorism are explored.