Hard-rooted to nature: rediscovering the forgotten forest in science education (original) (raw)
Related papers
Ecopsychology in Relationship between School Students and the Natural World
Ecopsychology studies the relationship between human beings and the natural world through ecological and psychological principles. The field seeks to develop and understand ways of expanding the emotional connection between individuals and the natural world, thereby assisting individuals with developing sustainable lifestyles and remedying alienation from nature. We describe specific examples using a pedagogical framework for helping School students to engage, explore, explain, and elaborate the psychology behind nature. This approach should better prepare students with an understanding that ecological knowledge must be integrated with solutions that address psychological barriers if efforts to alter behavior related to nature world are to succeed.
Staying with the Trouble in Science Education: Towards Thinking with Nature
Posthumanism and Higher Education: Reimagining Pedagogy, Practice and Research, 2019
Despite the centrality of Nature (space, time, matter) within science education, there is a telling and troubling paucity in the ways science education is taking up questions generated by the ontological turn. Thought in science education, we argue, is often premised upon Othering, and (fore)closed to, Nature. Within this manifesto, we respond to this problematic possibility by taking a critical and complicit stance: it is a call for disrupting and displacing the very logics through which we become science educators without succumbing to the fantasy of transcending them. Science education needs to think and do so otherwise while recognizing the ways in which thought is already in the groove of becoming-scientist. Towards this end, we first outline three onto-epistemological moves that often occur within science education that (fore)close both possibility and response-ability: a) commonplace thoughtlessness; b) stupidity; and c), circular reasoning. Secondly, we offer three orientations for troubling thought which do not engage in the hubris of waving away the trouble. They are thinking as: a) slow science; b) minor inquiry; and c) disruption. Call it staying with the trouble in science education: a science education which does not dismiss the urgent work of building and sustaining social and ecological relations through the temporality of emergency.
Lost in Space? Education and the Concept of Nature
Studies in Philosophy and Education, 2000
Although the idea of nature has all but disappeared from recent discussion of education, it remains highly relevant to the philosophy and practice of education, since tacit notions of human nature and what constitutes underlying reality-the 'natural' order of things-necessarily orientates education in fundamental ways. It is argued that underlying our various senses of nature is the idea of nature as the 'self-arising' whose intrinsic integrity, mystery and value implicitly condition our understanding of ourselves and of the reality in which we live. I argue that the acknowledgement of nature so conceived opens up a perspective on education that requires us to review currently dominant technological notions of truth and knowledge, and also of what should characterize the process of education, reasserting the proper place of more intuitive, local and dialogical knowledge and relationships.
An Ecological Framework for Science Education
2010
This paper provides a review and critique on the curricular implementations of a variety of issues-based approaches to education including the use of Science Technology and Society (STS) and Science Technology Society and Environment (STSE) perspectives that are influencing curriculum efforts in the US, Canada and worldwide. By characterising aspects of these implementations as a form of technocentric curriculum reform, the paper goes on to describe the problematic nature of this development for science and environmental education. The paper then provides a description of an ecological (context driven) framework for science education, which references the emerging discourse around socio-scientific issues, place-based education and is further grounded in an ecological conceptions of science education that emphasize the 'embeddedness' of human societies and cultures (and their technologies) within place-bound communities. The model describes a range of ecological, socio-cultur...
Nature's Classroom:: An Ethnographic Case Study of Environmental Education
2018
Hillsborough County who participated in the study. I would like to thank Superintendent MaryEllen Elia and the Department of Assessment and Accountability for allowing me to conduct this study. I am especially grateful to Karen Johnson-Folsom, site administrator and lead teacher of Nature's Classroom for her enthusiasm and support, and to the entire staff, who welcomed me as a part of their 'family.' I am very appreciative of the many wonderful sixth grade classroom teachers and students who participated in this research. The Florida Wildlife Federation provided generous support through funding the research.
Creative Education, 2015
This paper focuses upon the problem of raising environmental awareness in the context of school science education through an aesthetic appreciation of natural phenomena. In distinguishing between school learning and what could be called "conscious learning", the paper explores the role that such an aesthetic appreciation of nature, and more specifically of natural entities, such as trees, laves, water drops, crystals, and phenomena, such as, flashes of lightning, aurora borealis, the water cycle, volcanic eruptions and stellar explosions, can be an integral part of science teaching, which, in turn, can help raise in students environmental awareness.
An Ecological Framework for Science Education~!2009-11-12~!2010-01-01~!2010-04-09~!
The Open Education Journal, 2010
This paper provides a review and critique on the curricular implementations of a variety of issues-based approaches to education including the use of Science Technology and Society (STS) and Science Technology Society and Environment (STSE) perspectives that are influencing curriculum efforts in the US, Canada and worldwide. By characterising aspects of these implementations as a form of technocentric curriculum reform, the paper goes on to describe the problematic nature of this development for science and environmental education. The paper then provides a description of an ecological (context driven) framework for science education, which references the emerging discourse around socio-scientific issues, place-based education and is further grounded in an ecological conceptions of science education that emphasize the 'embeddedness' of human societies and cultures (and their technologies) within place-bound communities. The model describes a range of ecological, socio-cultural and technical influences that provide a framework for educators' diverse interpretations of curriculum.