Stephen T. Ziliak & Deirdre N. McCloskey, The Cult of Statistical Significance. How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2008 (original) (raw)

Reseña de "The Cult of Statistical Significance. How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives" de STEPHEN T. ZILIAK AND DEIRDRE N. MCCLOSKEY

Jean-Guy Prévost

Empiria Revista De Metodologia De Las Ciencias Sociales, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

THE CULT OF STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE: HOW THE STANDARD ERROR COSTS US JOBS, JUSTICE, AND LIVES - by Stephen T. Ziliak and Deirdre N. McCloskey

Jean-Guy Prévost

Economic Affairs, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

The cult of statistical significance. How the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives

Jean-Guy Prévost

EMPIRIA: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

A review of Stephen T. Ziliak and Deirdre N. McCloskey, The Cult of Statistical Significance. How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2008, 320 pages

Tamás Dusek

The Journal of Philosophical Economics, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Stephen T. Ziliak and Deirdre N. McCloskey: The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives

xueguang zhou

Administrative Science Quarterly, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

The significance of the significance test controversy: comments on ‘Size Matters’

Peter Lunt

The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Stephen T. Ziliak and Deirdre N. McCloskey's The cult of statistical significance: how the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Ann Arbor (MI): The University of Michigan Press, 2008, xxiii+322 pp

Aris Spanos

Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics

View PDFchevron_right

Statistical significance and its critics: practicing damaging science, or damaging scientific practice?

Deborah Mayo

Synthese

View PDFchevron_right

The Cult of Statistical Signi ficance-What Economists Should and Should Not Do To Make Their Data Talk

Walter Krämer

2011

View PDFchevron_right

Is there life after P < 0.05? Statistical significance and quantitative sociology

Athena Engman

View PDFchevron_right

The Magical Influene of Statistical Significance

abdalla alsmadi

View PDFchevron_right

The Cult of Statistical Significance

Steve Ziliak

2008

View PDFchevron_right

Statistical Significance Tests are Unnecessary Even When Properly Done and Properly Interpreted: Reply to Commentaries

Scott Armstrong

View PDFchevron_right

Why We Don’t Really Know What “Statistical Significance” Means: A Major Educational Failure*

Scott Armstrong

View PDFchevron_right

Statistical significance is okay, too: comment on “Size Matters”

Jeffrey Wooldridge

Journal of Socio-economics, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Statistical Significance Testing in Economics

William Peden

The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Economics, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

The Quest for Statistical Significance: Ignorance, Bias and Malpractice of Research Practitioners

International Journal of Research & Review (IJRR)

https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR\_Vol.5\_Issue.3\_March2018/Abstract\_IJRR0014.html, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Economic and statistical significance: comments on “Size Matters”

Erik Thorbecke

The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

On the tyranny of hypothesis testing in the social sciences

Geoffrey Loftus

PsycCRITIQUES, 1991

View PDFchevron_right

Even statisticians are not immune to misinterpretations of Null Hypothesis Significance Tests

Marie-paule Lecoutre

International Journal of Psychology, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

On the Misuse of Statistics: A Reply to Hirschfeld et al

William Divale

American Anthropologist, 1978

View PDFchevron_right

The significance fallacy in inferential statistics

Kühberger Anton

BMC Research Notes, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

The Perils of Statistics By Numbers

Thom Baguley

View PDFchevron_right

The harm done by tests of significance

Ezra Hauer

Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Alphas and Asterisks: The Development of Statistical Significance Testing Standards in Sociology

Erin Leahey

Social Forces, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Damaging Real Lives through Obstinacy: Re-Emphasising Why Significance Testing is Wrong

S. Gorard

Sociological Research Online, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Significance Testing is Still Wrong, and Damages Real Lives: A Brief Reply to Spreckelsen and Van Der Horst, and Nicholson and McCusker

S. Gorard

Sociological Research Online, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

A Review of the Latest Literature on Whether Statistical Significance Tests Should Be Banned

Thomas K Burdenski

1999

View PDFchevron_right

Statistical Significance Testing: A Historical Overview of Misuse and Misinterpretation with Implications for the Editorial Policies of Educational Journals

Mohamed Sharif

View PDFchevron_right

Significance tests as sorcery: Science is empirical—significance tests are not

Charles Lambdin

Theory & Psychology, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Statistical vs. economic significance in economics and econometrics: further comments on McCloskey and Ziliak

Tom Engsted

Journal of Economic Methodology, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Statistical Significance Testing in "Educational and Psychological Measurement" and Other Journals

Larry Daniel

1997

View PDFchevron_right

The American Statistician The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose

群弼 林

View PDFchevron_right

The Roles of Statistical Significance Testing In Research

IOSR Journals

View PDFchevron_right

Methodological and didactical controversies around statistical inference

Carmen Batanero

2006

View PDFchevron_right