The influence of body temperature on infarct volume and thrombolytic therapy in a rat embolic stroke model (original) (raw)

The effect of body temperature on cerebral infarcts and thrombolytic therapy was investigated in 91 rats embolized in the right carotid territory. Hypothermia of 32°C for 2 h with preembolic onset (n = 15) or hyperthermia of 39°C for 2 h with postembolic onset (n = 22) was compared to normothermic controls (n = 17). After 48 h of survival, neuropathological evaluation with measurement of infarct volume was performed. Median infarct volume in percent of affected hemisphere volume was 11% (9-21, quartiles) in rats treated with hypothermia alone, compared to 46% (14-59, quartiles) in normothermic controls (P = 0.04). Hyperthermia for 2 h increased median infarct volume to 65% (37-75, quartiles). There was a positive and significant correlation between infarct volume and body temperature (R-0.53, P = 0.0002, n = 54). Mortality rate was significantly higher among rats treated with hyperthermia compared to normothermic controls (P = 0.005). A subset of 37 rats exposed to the same temperature regimen were treated with tissue plasminogen activator (20 mg/kg i.v. during 45 min) 2 h after embolization. Judged by posttreatment carotid angiography, hyperthermic rats (n = 11) had the best degree of recanalization (P = 0.03) compared to controls (n = 17), but median infarct volume in this group was (58% (27-67, quartiles)) significantly larger (P < 0.02) than normothermic (21% (15-39, quartiles), n = 14) and hypothermic (13% (7-31, quartiles), n = 12) rats treated with thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolytic therapy following 2 h of hypothermia, could not improve the effect of hypothermia alone. We conclude, that the size of infarcts in our embolic stroke model is dependent on the body temperature during the initial phase of infarct development. Hyperthermia had a detrimental effect when combined with thrombolytic therapy and should be avoided in clinical trials of this treatment.