Single amino acid substitutions in the cAMP receptor protein specifically abolish regulation by the CytR repressor in Escherichia coli (original) (raw)
Related papers
Nucleic Acids Research, 1993
In E.coli repression of transcription initiation by the CytR protein relies on CytR-DNA interactions as well as on interactions between CytR and the cAMP-CRP activator complex. To identify the nucleotide sequence recognized by CytR, mutants of the deoP2 promoter with a reduced regulatory response to CytR have been isolated. Five single bp mutation derivatives of deoP2 with a 2-5-fold decrease in CytR regulation have been characterized. In vitro, the only effect of the mutations was a decrease in the binding affinity of CytR, and a clear correlation was observed between the reduction in CytR regulation in vivo and the reduction in CytR binding in vitro. The mutations all reside in a sequence element that contains an imperfect direct as well as an imperfect inverted repeat. As the active form of CytR, most likely, is an oligomer with twofold rotational symmetry, CytR probably interacts with the inverted repeat. Degenerate versions of the inverted repeat are present in all CytR binding sites characterized so far, however, the distance between the half-sites varies.
Molecular Microbiology, 1991
Unlike cfassicat bacterial repressors, the CytR repressor of Escherichia coli cannot independently regulate gene expression. Here we show that CytR binding to the deoP2 promoter relies on interaction with the master gene regulatory protein, CRP, and, furthermore, that cAMP-CRP and CytR bind co-operatively to deoP2. Using mutant promoters we show that tandem, properly spaced DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes are required for this co-operative binding. These data suggest that CytR forms a bridge between tandem cAMP-CRP complexes, and that cAMP-CRP ftjnctions as an adaptor for CytR. The implications of this new version of negative control in E. coli on bacterial gene expression and on combinatorial gene regulation in higher organisms are discussed.
1990
We have studied the deoP2 promoter in Escherichia colito define features important for its interaction with the CytR repressor. As is characteristic for CytR-regulated promoters, deoP2 encodes tandem binding sites for the activating compiex cAMP-CRP. One of these sites, CRP-1, overlaps the-35 region, and is sufficient for activation; the second site, CRP-2, centred around-93, is indispensable for repression. Here we demonstrate, by means of in vivo titration, that CytR interaction with deoP2 depends not only on CRP-2, but also on CRP-1 and the length and possibly the sequence separating these two sites. Also, point mutations in either CRP site reduce or abolish CytR titration; however, no co-operativity is observed in the interaction of CytR with the two CRP binding sites. Furthermore, the reduction in CytR titration parallels the reduction in binding of cAMP-CRP to the mutated CRP sites in vitro. These observations are not easily explained by current models for the action of prokaryotic repressors; instead we favour a model in which the interaction of CytR with deoP2 depends on the presence of tandem DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes.
The Camp-CRP Cytr Nucleoprotein Complex in Escherichia-Coli - is Cytr More Than a Local Regulator
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 1995
Transcription initiation at CytR regulated promoters in Escherichia coli is controlled by a combinatorial regulatory system in which the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) functions as both an activator and a co-repressor. By combining genetic studies and footprinting analyses, we demonstrate that regulated expression of the CytR controlled cdd promoter requires three CRP-binding sites: a high affinity site (CRP-1) and two overlapping low affinity sites (CRP-2 and CRP-3) centred at positions-41,-91 and-93, respectively. In the absence of CytR, cAMP-CRP interacts at one set of sites (CRP-1 and CRP-2) and both of these binding sites are required for full promoter activation. In the presence of CytR, however, the two regulators bind cooperatively to cddP forming a nucleoprotein complex in which cAMP-CRP binds to CRP-1 and CRP-3 and CytR occupies the sequence between these sites. Thus, association of the two regulators involves a repositioning of the cAMP-CRP complex. Moreover, mutant cdd promoters in which CRP-2 and CRP-3 have been deleted are partially regulated by CytR, and cAMP-CRP and CytR still bind cooperatively to these promoters. These findings provide clues to an understanding of how cAMP-CRP and CytR interact at a structurally diverse set of promoters.
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2000
At promoters of the Escherichia coli CytR regulon, the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) interacts with the repressor CytR to form transcriptionally inactive CRP-CytRpromoter or (CRP) 2 -CytR-promoter complexes. Here, using "oriented heterodimer" analysis, we show that only one subunit of the CRP dimer, the subunit proximal to CytR, functionally interacts with CytR in CRP-CytRpromoter and (CRP) 2 -CytR-promoter complexes. Our results provide information about the architecture of CRP-CytR-promoter and (CRP) 2 -CytR-promoter complexes and rule out the proposal that masking of activating region 2 of CRP is responsible for the transcriptional inactivity of the complexes.
Journal of Bacteriology
The tsx-p2 promoter is one of at least seven Escherichia coli promoters that are activated by the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complex and negatively regulated by the CytR repressor. DNase I footprinting assays were used to study the interactions of these regulatory proteins with the tsx-p2 promoter region and to characterize tsx-p2 regulatory mutants exhibiting an altered response to CytR. We show that the cAMP-CRP activator complex recognizes two sites in tsx-p2 that are separated by 33 bp: a high-affinity site (CRP-1) overlaps the -35 region, and a low-affinity site (CRP-2) is centered around position -74 bp. The CytR repressor protects a DNA segment that is located between the two CRP sites and partially overlaps the CRP-1 target. In combination, the cAMP-CRP and CytR proteins bind cooperatively to tsx-p2, and the nucleoprotein complex formed covers a region of 78 bp extending from the CRP-2 site close to the -10 region. The inducer for the CytR repressor, cytidine, does not prevent in vitro DNA binding of CytR, but releases the repressor from the nucleoprotein complex and leaves the cAMP-CRP activator bound to its two DNA targets. Thus, cytidine interferes with the cooperative DNA binding of cAMP-CRP and CytR to tsx-p2. We characterized four tsx-p2 mutants exhibiting a reduced response to CytR; three carried mutations in the CRP-2 site, and one carried a mutation in the region between CRP-1 and the -10 sequence. Formation of the cAMP-CRP-CytR DNA nucleoprotein complex in vitro was perturbed in each mutant. These data indicate that the CytR repressor relies on the presence of the cAMP-CRP activator complex to regulate tsr-p2 promoter activity and that the formation of an active repression complex requires the combined interactions of cAMP-CRP and CytR at tsX-p2.
The EMBO journal, 1992
Transcription initiation at CytR regulated promoters in Escherichia coli is controlled by a combinatorial regulatory system in which the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) functions as both an activator and a co-repressor. By combining genetic studies and footprinting analyses, we demonstrate that regulated expression of the CytR controlled cdd promoter requires three CRP-binding sites: a high affinity site (CRP-1) and two overlapping low affinity sites (CRP-2 and CRP-3) centred at positions -41, -91 and -93, respectively. In the absence of CytR, cAMP-CRP interacts at one set of sites (CRP-1 and CRP-2) and both of these binding sites are required for full promoter activation. In the presence of CytR, however, the two regulators bind cooperatively to cddP forming a nucleoprotein complex in which cAMP-CRP binds to CRP-1 and CRP-3 and CytR occupies the sequence between these sites. Thus, association of the two regulators involves a repositioning of the cAMP-CRP complex. Moreover, mutant cdd p...
Journal of Molecular Biology, 1997
In CytR regulated promoters in Escherichia coli, the cAMP-CRP complex acts as a transcriptional activator as well as a co-repressor for the CytR protein. Repression by CytR depends on the formation of nucleoprotein complexes in which CytR binds cooperatively to the DNA with one or two cAMP-CRP complexes. Here, we demonstrate that in order to establish CytR regulation in a cAMP-CRP dependent class II promoter with a single CRP site (CRP site centred around position À40.5) in which the CytR operator is located upstream of the CRP site, high af®nity binding sites for both regulators are required. The ef®ciency of CytR regulation was observed to be modulated by RNA polymerase (RNAP)-promoter interactions. Speci®cally, in class II promoters with a single CRP site, the ef®ciency of CytR regulation was found to correlate inversely with cAMP-CRP independent promoter activity. These observations can be reconciled in a competition model for CytR regulation in which CytR and RNAP compete for cooperative binding with cAMP-CRP to the promoters in vivo. In this model, two mutually exclusive ternary complexes can be formed: a CytR/cAMP-CRP/promoter repression complex and an RNAP/cAMP-CRP/promoter activation complex. Thus, CytR regulation critically depends on formation of a repression complex that binds the promoter with suf®ciently high af®nity to exclude formation of the competing activation complex. We suggest that the transition from repression to activation involves a switch in the protein-protein interactions made by cAMP-CRP from CytR to RNAP. On the basis of the regulatory features of the promoters analysed here, we speculate about the advantages offered by the structural complexity of natural CytR/cAMP-CRP regulated promoters.
Journal of Bacteriology
We have investigated the regulation of the Escherichia coli deoCp2 promoter by the CytR repressor and the cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP) complexed to cAMP. Promoter regions controlled by these two proteins characteristically contain tandem cAMP-CRP binding sites. Here we show that (i) CytR selectively regulated cAMP-CRP-dependent initiations, although transcription started from the same site in deoCp2 in the absence or presence of cAMP-CRP; (ii) deletion of the uppermost cAMP-CRP target (CRP-2) resulted in loss of CytR regulation, but had only a minor effect on positive control by the cAMP-CRP complex; (iii) introduction of point mutations in either CRP target resulted in loss of CytR regulation; and (iv) regulation by CytR of deletion mutants lacking CRP-2 could be specifically reestablished by increasing the intracellular concentration of CytR. These findings indicate that both CRP targets are required for efficient CytR repression of deoCp2. Models for the action of Cyt...