Introduction: the interface between contemporary British Black and Jewish cultures (original) (raw)
Jewish Culture and History
The origins of this special issue lie in a symposium on 'The Interface Between British Contemporary Black and Jewish Cultures', co-sponsored by the British Academy-funded network 'British Jewish Contemporary Cultures' and the 'Identities' research group at the University of Reading, held at Reading in November 2016. The symposium was conceived as part of a larger, interdisciplinary research project entitled 'Towards a British 'Black-Jewish Imaginary': The Interface Between British Black and Jewish Literature, Art and Culture 1945-2015ʹ. The inspiration for this project was the recognition of the stark contrast between the large body of scholarship on black-Jewish relations in the United States and the relative paucity of work on this subject in the context of the United Kingdom. Over the past four decades, a considerable body of work has emerged on the interface between black and Jewish literature, art and culture in the United States, whose influence is signified by the circulation of the term 'black-Jewish imaginary' within U.S. academic discourse. 1 In contrast, there has been very little scholarship on black-Jewish cultural relations in the context of the United Kingdom. There is a significant body of historical scholarship that explores the affinities and differences between the experiences of Jews and BME immigrants in Britain. Colin Holmes, in John Bull's Island: Immigration and British Society, 1871-1971 (London: Routledge, 1988) points out the parallels between the racism encountered by a range of different immigrant groups during this period: The relationships of [immigrants]. .. from the West Indies, India and Pakistan to the housing market. .. was subject to change over the course of time. But. .. the majority of individuals from such groups were to be found by 1971 in the inferior properties of the inner cities. .. these newcomers soon became associated with the causes of the infrastructural problems of the grey, forbidding inner city regions and, as with the earlier Jews in the East End, this association was to add a further complication to their lives. 2
Related papers
Cojocaru, Alina. ”Representations of Eastern European Jewish Immigrants in Early Twentieth-Century British Press: Judaism and the Urban Regeneration of London.” DIALOGO, ISSN: 2393-1744, vol.9, issue 1 (November 2022): pp. 34-45., 2022
This paper examines the (mis)representations of Eastern European Jewish immigrants in the British newspapers of the early twentieth century. As members of transnational networks, as simple travelers or victims of a forced emigration, Jews pursued economic prospects, freedom from antisemitism or the right to assert their political and cultural liberties while exploring new cities. The migration flows brought them to various European metropolises that were not only observed through the eyes of “the other,” “the stranger,” but also shaped by the cultural articulations of Judaism. Jewish migrants were nonetheless often perceived as dangerous to the ideas of national homogeneity. Positioning itself at the nexus of discourse and experience, a particular focus of this paper is to investigate the manner in which the cultural and religious differences experienced by both Jewish migrants and the settled population were depicted and negotiated, as well as the impact that Jewish immigrants had on the development of the modern city, specifically on London’s East End.
The Jewish'Ghetto': Formation and Spatial Structure
2001
Research into patterns of immigrant settlement has consistently indicated that certain areas of cities are prone to settlement by immigrant groups. This paper proposes that immigrant settlement of such areas may have a particular spatial pattern. Taking the case of the settlement of Leeds, England by Jewish immigrants in the latter six decades of the nineteenth century, we describe the formation of the immigrant Jewish settlement in the area called Leylands.
This article has two main purposes. First, it aims to unpack the question "Are Jews white?" by insisting that the assignment of even ambiguous racial identities to "Jews" as an undifferentiated collective is a categorical mistake. It argues instead for a highly contextualized approach to the racialization of certain Jews or groups of Jews in certain times and places for certain purposes and from certain perspectives-which need not imply any lessening of the import of such racialization. Second, and more specifically, it aims to provoke a careful discussion of the racialization of traditionalist Jews in the particular context of growing and recently established residential enclaves in the suburbs of New York City, and suggests that legal or scholarly understanding of their difference as primarily "religious" is also mistaken.
Citizenship and belonging : East London Jewish radicals
2003
This thesis is about citizenship and belonging: how citizenship has articulated with or against different forms, practices and spaces of belonging. It examines Jewish East London in the period from 1903 to the end of the First World War and is based on original archival research. It argues that this period saw the emergence of a new form of racialized biopolitical citizenship, which was normalized in the "state of emergency" that was the war. This citizenship was framed by the imperial context, was based on singular 1e1it her/or" identities and was defined against the figure of alien. The thesis also argues that, in the same period, an alternative space of political belonging existed in East London, based on different forms of political rationality and threaded through with multiple loyalties and identifications, that challenged the either/or logic of the nation-state. Consequently, Jewish radicals who operated in this alternative public sphere developed understanding...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.