Diphosphoryl Lipid A from Rhodobacter sphaeroides Blocks the Binding and Internalization of Lipopolysaccharide in RAW 264.7 Cells (original) (raw)
Related papers
FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, 1994
Pentaacyl diphosphoryl lipid A derived from the nontoxic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides ATCC 17023 (RsDPLA) did not induce tumour necrosis factor-a nor interleukin-6 release in the murine macrophage-like cell line J774.1. However, it effectively inhibited the induction of these two cytokines by LPS of Salmonella minnesota Re mutant R595 (ReLPS) in a concentration-dependent manner. Maximal inhibition and half-maximal inhibition occurred when the ReLPS to RsDPLA mass ratio was 1:30 and 1:1, respectively. A binding study was performed in the presence of serum to determine whether RsDPLA is competing with ReLPS for LPS binding sites on J774.1 cells. This assay allows the determination of LPS binding to J774.1 cells via a mechanism involving CD14, a receptor for complexes of LPS with LPS binding protein (LBP), and its possible inhibition. The results show that RsDPLA strongly inhibits the binding of I25I-labelled ReLPS to J774.1 cells. Maximal and one-half maximal inhibition of binding occurred when the ReLPS to RsDPLA mass ratios were 1 : 2.5 and 1 : 0.5, respectively. It was found that the inhibition of binding by RsDPLA was much stronger than that by unlabelled ReLPS. These results suggest that RsDPLA is competing with ReLPS for CD14-dependent recognition of LPS on J774.1 cells.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding Protein Inhibits Responses to Cell-bound LPS
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2003
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP) is an acute phase reactant that may play a dual role in vivo, both potentiating and decreasing cell responses to bacterial LPS. Whereas low concentrations of LBP potentiate cell stimulation by transferring LPS to CD14, high LBP concentrations inhibit cell responses to LPS. One inhibitory mechanism involves the ability of LBP to neutralize LPS by transferring it to plasma lipoproteins, whereas other inhibitory mechanisms, such as the one described here, do not require exogenous lipoproteins. Here we show that LBP can inhibit monocyte responses to LPS that has already bound to membrane-bound CD14 (mCD14) on the cell surface. LBP caused rapid dissociation of LPS from mCD14 as measured by the ability of LBP to inhibit cross-linking of a radioiodinated, photoactivatable LPS derivative to mCD14. Whereas LBP removed up to 75% of the mCD14-bound LPS in 10 min, this was not accompanied by extensive release of the LPS from the cells. The cross-linking data suggest that much of the LPS that remained bound to the cells was associated with LBP. The ability of LBP to inhibit cell responses could not be explained by its effect on LPS internalization, because LBP did not significantly increase the internalization of the cell-bound LPS. In cell-free LPS cross-linking experiments, LBP inhibited the transfer of LPS from soluble CD14 to soluble MD-2. Our data support the hypothesis that LBP can inhibit cell responses to LPS by inhibiting LPS transfer from mCD14 to the Toll-like receptor 4-MD-2 signaling receptor. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS 1 ; endotoxin), an abundant component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, is one
Infection and Immunity, 1993
Rhodobacter sphaeroides lipid A (RsDPLA) and SDZ 880.431 (3-aza-lipid X-4-phosphate) are prototypic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antagonists. Herein, we examined the ability of these structures to regulate murine macrophage tumor necrosis factor (TNF) secretion and LPS-inducible gene expression (tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-alpha], interleukin-1 beta [IL-1 beta], IP-10, type 2 TNF receptor [TNFR-2], D3, and D8 genes). We report that RsDPLA alone (> 1 microgram/ml) induced low levels of TNF-alpha secretion and a selective pattern of gene expression in peritoneal exudate macrophages; SDZ 880.431 alone was completely inactive. When LPS was present at a low concentration (1 ng/ml), RsDPLA and SDZ 880.431 blocked TNF secretion and gene induction in a concentration-dependent fashion. In general, gene induction was measurably reduced by 10 to 30 ng of RsDPLA per ml or 300 ng of SDZ 880.431 per ml, but inhibition could be uniformly overridden by increasing the concentration of LPS. Altho...
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2001
The structural features of some proteins of the innate immune system involved in mediating responses to microbial pathogens are highly conserved throughout evolution. Examples include members of the Drosophila Toll (dToll) and the mammalian Toll-like receptor (TLR) protein families. Activation of Drosophila Toll is believed to occur via an endogenous peptide rather than through direct binding of microbial products to the Toll protein. In mammals there is a growing consensus that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) initiates its biological activities through a heteromeric receptor complex containing CD14, TLR4, and at least one other protein, MD-2. LPS binds directly to CD14 but whether LPS then binds to TLR4 and/or MD-2 is not known. We have used transient transfection to express human TLRs, MD-2, or CD14 alone or in different combinations in HEK 293 cells. Interactions between LPS and these proteins were studied using a chemically modified, radioiodinated LPS containing a covalently linked, UV light-activated crosslinking group ( 125 I-ASD-Re595 LPS). Here we show that LPS is cross-linked specifically to TLR4 and MD-2 only when co-expressed with CD14. These data support the contention that LPS is in close proximity to the three known proteins of its membrane receptor complex. Thus, LPS binds directly to each of the members of the tripartite LPS receptor complex.
Biochemical Journal, 2005
SP-A (surfactant protein A) is a lipid-binding collectin primarily involved in innate lung immunity. SP-A interacts with the bacterial rough LPS (lipopolysaccharide) Re-LPS (Re595 mutant of LPS from Salmonella minnesota), but not with smooth LPS. In the present study, we first examined the characteristics of the interaction of human SP-A with Re-LPS. Fluorescence intensity and anisotropy measurements of FITC-labelled Re-LPS in the presence and absence of SP-A indicated that SP-A bound to Re-LPS in solution in a Ca 2+ -independent manner, with a dissociation constant of 2.8 × 10 −8 M. In the presence of calcium, a high-mobility complex of SP-A and [ 3 H]Rb-LPS (Rb mutant of LPS from Escherichia coli strain LCD 25) micelles was formed, as detected by sucrose density gradients. Re-LPS aggregation induced by SP-A was further characterized by light scattering. On the other hand, human SP-A inhibited TNF-α (tumour necrosis factor-α) secretion by human macrophage-like U937 cells stimulated with either Re-LPS or smooth LPS. We further examined the effects of human SP-A on the binding of Re-LPS to LBP (LPS-binding protein) and CD14. SP-A decreased the binding of Re-LPS to CD14, but not to LBP, as detected by cross-linking experiments with 125 I-ASD-Re-LPS [ 125 I-labelled sulphosuccinimidyl-2-(pazidosalicylamido)-1,3-dithiopropionate derivative of Re-LPS] and fluorescence analysis with FITC-Re-LPS. When SP-A, LBP and CD14 were incubated together, SP-A reduced the ability of LBP to transfer 125 I-ASD-Re-LPS to CD14. These SP-A effects were not due to the ability of SP-A to aggregate Re-LPS in the presence of calcium, since they were observed in both the absence and the presence of calcium. These studies suggest that SP-A could contribute to modulate Re-LPS responses by altering the competence of the LBP-CD14 receptor complex.