Meaning Components of Left and Right: A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Party Manifestos on Voter Left-Right Cognitions Across Four Decades and 10 European Countries (original) (raw)
Related papers
Beyond Left and Right: A Scale to Measure Political Ideology in India
2021
Most work assessing political ideology and its underpinnings has used primarily western samples. Given India’s unique position as the world’s largest parliamentary democracy with a multiparty system, the present research aimed to develop a scale to measure political ideology in India. Pilot work indicated that the social and economic bifurcation of the conception of political ideology was inadequate in assessing Indians’ stance on political issues. Therefore, in Study 1, 48 items were written relevant to the complex context of political ideology in India. Three factors were extracted based on a sample of 541 Indians (Mage = 24.80, SD = 8.44): purity-based cultural norms, obedience to hierarchy, and economic ideology, highlighting the importance attributed to social concerns. In Study 2, 382 Indians responded to a revised scale (Mage = 26.15 years, SD = 9.00). Based on a confirmatory factor analysis, the three-factor structure was retained. Measurement invariance revealed expected di...
The Importance of Left-Right orientations in the new democracies
2005
Using data from the CSES, we first explore the use of the left-right orientations crossnationally and, where available, at two moments of time. First, we evaluate the propensity for individuals to place themselves and the main parties on a left-right scale as individual recognition of political space. We then assess the extent to which left-right assessments are consistent among citizens of the same polity. Finally, we evaluate the relationships between one's ideological distance to a party and preference toward that party. These three categories of left-right orientations will be assessed in relationship with both individual and macro level factors.
Social, political and economic reality in Albania has led to the debate on policy issues of left and right specter at a specifically theoretical and practical level. In order to shed light on the vagueness of ideological structuring of Albanian main parties, a survey was undertaken. This survey would examine how the electorate of Tirana perceived the relation between the Albanian politics and ideology. At the same time, the survey would assess the behavior of the voting electorate in relation to this structuring of the Albanian political parties. The results of such a sociological research are very important because this perception of Tirana electorate has a great impact on its voting behavior. Moreover, one third of the electorate of the Republic of Albania lives in Tirana, having thus a very significant effect on the general opinion of the Albanian society. Keywords: ideology, left, right, political parties, social context
The Hungarian Voter: Left-Right Dimension as a Clue to Policy Preferences
International Political Science Review, 2004
The left-right (L-R) ideological dimension has been regarded as a useful cognitive device for orientation in the political realm. Thanks to its absorptive nature it is able to represent a party's stands on various issues simultaneously. This article specifies a number of conditions that its use ought to satisfy in order to function as a "rational" clue for parties' positions on issues. The perceived position of parties on the L-R dimension should correspond to the parties' actual issue positions, and the public should be aware of which policies are represented by particular positions on the L-R dimension. The present article addresses this problem, and provides an empirical test on the basis of survey data on political preferences of a random sample of Hungarian voters (N = 1453) and of members of the Hungarian national Parliament. The evidence generally supports the plausibility of the examined model, and shows that members of the Hungarian public are reasonably successful in matching their and their representatives' issue preferences via the familiar left-right ideological code.
Determinants of Party Policy Preferences. Evidence from Party Manifestos in Belgium
PhD in Political Science, 2012
My study aimed at contributing to the understanding of party policy preferences in Belgium, i.e. how far can we explain the attention that political parties allocate to different policy issues in their electoral manifestos. One of the added values of my study was located in the research design. I reversed the perspective that is used in most of previous works and I used party policy preferences – via the analysis of party manifestos – as a dependent rather than an independent variable. I was not interested in what could be explained by party preferences but in what could actually explain them. In addition, I observed that, in the few works that considered party policy preferences as a dependent variable, party competition was rarely mobilised as an explanatory variable. My study aimed at contributing to the understanding of the content of party manifestos by confronting the hypothesis of party competition with other possible explanations. With the help of new data about party preferences in Belgian party manifestos collected in the framework of the CAP project, I quantitatively analysed the content of all party manifestos between 1977 and 2007 and coded them according policy domains and issues (up to about 250 policy issues and coding categories). Based on the selection of four specific policy issues (environment, decentralisation, migration and morality issues) and on regression analyses (panel data), I hypothesised that party preferences on theses policy issues is best explained by party competition variables. My findings confirmed that party policy preferences are not static but rather that they evolve over time. Party preferences are different over time and space and I aimed at providing clues about what could explain these differences. Based on the literature, a large set of potential explanatory variables has been mobilised in order to explain these differences. But most of these independent variables have no or few impact on party preferences, such as the fractionalisation of the party system or ‘real-world’ indicators. Contrary to previous findings, changes in party manifestos are not explained by the fact that the party grows in size and gets older or by the fact that it wins or loses the elections. Similarly, I observed that party strategies – including party name change and the creation of electoral alliances – had no impact of the content of party manifestos. Even if my bivariate analyses indicated the importance of phenomena related to the government formation and participation, I found out that this effect disappears in multivariate analyses. Still, the introduction of my party competition variables – based on the niche party’s size, electoral fortunes and government participation – provided ambiguous results, depending on the policy issue at stake. Party competition contributes to the understanding of party policy preferences on environment and migration. Nonetheless, my models do not demonstrate an impact of party competition on preferences concerning decentralisation and morality. When controlling for party families, I observe that party competition has a significant impact on party preferences, meaning that political parties react to the electoral strength of a niche party by paying more attention to the niche party’s issue in their manifesto. Finally, the observed impact of party competition on policy preferences concerns certain parties only and the other parties display preferences that appear independent from the existing patterns of party competition.
Attitudinal dispositions to vote for a 'new' extreme right-wing party: The case of 'Vlaams Blok
European Journal of Political Research, 1995
The Vlaams Blok, a 'new' extreme right-wing party, grew substantially during the 1980s in the Flemish part of Belgium. Two alternative hypotheses about the motivation and attitudes of voters for extreme right-wing parties are examined. Is the voters' choice for such a political party inspired by substantive considerations about the programme of the party (the 'rational choice' model), or is right-wing voting mainly an expression of protest? The Flemish part of the Voters' Study relating to the 1991 General Election contains useful data for answering these questions. The likelihood of voting for the Vlaams Blok, as a function of thirteen relevant attitudinal variables, is analysed by means of logistic regression. Voting for the Vlaams Blok is determined by a negative attitude towards immigrants. Nationalist attitudes and feelings of social isolation seem to have a partial and moderate additional impact. In addition, there is some evidence that a vote for the Vlaams Blok should also be seen as a protest vote by some of the voters.
Left-right ideology: Its meaning and effects on party preferences in Serbia
Socioloski pregled, 2016
Left-right ideology is regarded as an expression of socioeconomic divisions. More recently, it has expanded to incorporate orientations such as nationalism or postmaterialism, and relaxed its association with social structure. Furthermore, the meaning of the political left and right varies across political contexts. As a result it is questionable to what extent left-right labels can successfully function as heuristic devices for political orientation. In order to understand the meaning of the left-right ideological dimension in a specific context it is necessary to examine the ways public responds to these labels, its socioeconomic correlates, and its associations with party preferences. These tasks are undertaken in this paper, focusing on Serbia. The paper examines the readiness of Serbian respondents to identify with the leftright ideological labels, and develops a multivariate model of party preferences using socioeconomic variables and left-right scale and predictors. The study is based on data from the 2012 Serbian election study, a public opinion survey of 1568 voting age citizens of Serbia. Results indicate that about two thirds of respondents are willing to express their left-right ideological positions. This ideological dimension, however, has weak socioeconomic roots, and is weakly, though significantly, associated with party preferences.
Politics and policies of left-wing parties
Routledge eBooks, 2022
This chapter discusses the relationship between the politics of left-wing parties from the 1980s up to the most recent phase, together with the policies that have determined paths of more or less inclusive growth. The focus therefore concerns how electoral consensus-building strategies have been intertwined with economic and social choices. Reference is made to left-wing parties in order to include not only parties belonging to the larger family of social democrats and socialists in this category but also to the smaller family of liberal left-wing democratic parties, such as the US Democratic Party (see Armingeon et al., 2018). Our analysis therefore concentrates on the broad area of the "left reformist" parties, including socialist and social-democratic, but in some cases also liberal-democratic, parties, i.e. the Labour Party (LP) in the United Kingdom and the Democratic Party (DP) in the United States, the Sveriges socialdemokratiska arbetareparti (SAP) in Sweden and the Socialdemokratiet (SD) in Denmark, the Parti Socialiste (PS) in France and the Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschland (SPD) in Germany, the Partido Socialista Obrero Español (PSOE) in Spain and, in the case of Italy, the series of left-wing parties that have succeeded one another since the 1980s. Each of these actors, while internally heterogeneous, has its own cultural, organisational, and governmental traditions, which have contributed to forging the paths taken, as well as policy proposals and attitudes towards demands for redistribution. Obviously, in each case, the overall political-institutional framework (national, supra-, and sub-national), the choices made by other parties, and the electoral results are all important. Another consideration for which it seemed appropriate to focus on leftwing parties draws on the hypothesis that they were the political actors most constitutively suited to promoting processes of redistribution and limiting inequalities in advanced economies. In fact, the options that have characterised the programmes of these parties and the actions taken by social democratic governments in Europe feature progressive taxation, the construction of the welfare state and labour protection. The data collected in the first