The practical application of three validated in vitro embryotoxicity tests. The report and recommendations of an ECVAM/ZEBET workshop (ECVAM workshop 57) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Preliminary results of the ECVAM validation study on three in vitro embryotoxicity tests
Alternatives to laboratory animals: ATLA
From 1996 to 2000, ZEBET (Centre for Documentation and Evaluation of Alternative Methods to Animal Experiments at the BgVV, Berlin, Germany) coordinated the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) prevalidation and validation study on three embryotoxicity tests: a) a test employing embryonic stem cell lines (EST); b) the micromass (MM) test; and c) the postimplantation rat whole-embryo culture assay (WEC test). The main objectives of the study were to assess the performance of these three in vitro tests in discriminating between non-embryotoxic, weakly embryotoxic and strongly embryotoxic compounds. Phase I of the study (1997) was designed as a prevalidation phase, for test protocol optimisation, and for the establishment of a comprehensive database of in vivo and in vitro data on embryotoxic compounds. Phase II (1998)(1999)(2000) involved a formal validation trial, conducted under blind conditions on 20 test compounds selected from the database, which were coded and distributed to the participating laboratories. In the preliminary phase of the validation study, six chemicals out of the 20, which showed embryotoxic potential, were tested. These results were used to define new biostatistically based prediction models (PMs) for the MM and WEC tests, and to evaluate those developed previously for the EST. As a next step, the PMs were evaluated by using the results for the remaining 14 chemicals of the definitive phase of the validation study. The three in vitro embryotoxicity tests proved to be applicable to testing a diverse group of chemicals with different embryotoxic potentials (non-embryotoxic, weakly embryotoxic, and strongly embryotoxic). The reproducibility of the three in vitro embryotoxicity tests were acceptable according to the acceptance criteria defined by the Management Team. The concordances between the embryotoxic potentials derived from the in vitro data and from the in vivo data were good for the EST and the WEC (PM2) test, and sufficient for the MM test and the WEC (PM1) tests according to the performance criteria defined by the Management Team before the formal validation study. When applying the PM of the EST to the in vitro data obtained in the definitive phase of the formal validation study, chemicals were classified correctly in 78% of the experiments. For the MM and the WEC tests, the PMs provided 70% and 80% (PM2) correct classifications, respectively. And, very importantly, an excellent predictivity (100%, except for PM1 of the WEC test, with 79%, considered as good) was obtained with strongly embryotoxic chemicals in each of the three in vitro tests.
In vitro & molecular toxicology, 2000
Since 1997 the National Center for Documentation and Evaluation of Alternative Methods to Animal Experiments, ZEBET, in Berlin, has been coordinating a validation study aimed at prevalidation and validation of three in vitro embryotoxicity tests, funded by the European Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) at the Joint Research Center (JRC, Ispra, Italy). The tests use the cultivation of postimplantation rat whole embryos (WEC test), cultures of primary limb bud cells of rat embryos (micromass or, MM, test), and cultures of a pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cell line (embryonic stem cell test or EST). Each of the tests was performed in four laboratories under blind conditions. In the preliminary phase of the validation study 6 out of 20 test chemicals comprising different embryotoxic potential (non, weakly, and strongly embryotoxic) were tested. The results were used to define biostatistically based prediction models (PMs) to identify the embryotoxic potential of...
Prevalidation of the Embryonic Stem Cell Test (EST)—A New In Vitro Embryotoxicity Test
Toxicology in Vitro, 1999
ÐPluripotent embryonic stem cells (ES cells) of the mouse (cell-line D3) can be maintained in the undierentiated state in the presence of LIF (Leukaemia Inhibitory Factor). Upon withdrawal of LIF, these cells dierentiate into various cell types under appropriate conditions. This property of ES cells allowed us to develop an in vitro embryotoxicity test, the Embryonic Stem Cell Test (EST; In Vitro Toxicology 1997, 10, 119±127), which does not require taking embryonic cells or tissues from pregnant animals. In the EST, the eect of test chemicals on three endpoints is assessed: inhibition of the dierentiation of ES cells into contracting myocard, cytotoxicity in ES cells and cytotoxicity in mouse 3T3 ®broblasts, which are serving as dierentiated cells in the test. The results of a prevalidation study of the EST are described, which was conducted according to the ECVAM prevalidation scheme. In the ®rst stage of the study (Phase I), a standard operating procedure (SOP) was elaborated. In the second phase (Phase II), the interlaboratory transferability of the EST was assessed using three test chemicals representing three classes of embryotoxicity (a strong, a weak and a non-embryotoxic chemical) in two European laboratories (ZEBET at the BgVV in Berlin, Germany; ECVAM at the JRC in Ispra, Italy) and one US laboratory (Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) in Gaithersburgh, MA, USA). In the ®nal stage of prevalidation (Phase III), nine test chemicals and a positive control were tested under blind conditions at ZEBET and ECVAM. The statistical evaluation of the results led to the development of an improved prediction model for the EST.
Toxicological Sciences, 2008
The ability of murine-derived embryonic stem cells (D3) to differentiate into cardiomyocytes is the basis of the embryonic stem cell test (EST). With the EST, chemicals and pharmaceuticals can be assessed for their embryotoxic potency early on in the development process. In order to come to a higher throughput EST, a 96-well based method was developed based on low attachment well plates that allow for the formation of embryonic bodies from which the stem cells can differentiate. Twelve test compounds were selected based on their reported in vitro and in vivo embryotoxic potency. In the 96-well based EST, reportedly strong embryotoxic compounds 5-fluorouracil, 6-aminonicotinamide (6AN), methylmercury chloride, and hydroxyurea were correctly ranked with corresponding Relative Embryotoxic Potency values (REP, based on the EC 50 (mM) value of 6AN) of 2.6 ± 2.9, 1, 2.0 ± 3.1, and 0.07 ± 0.05, respectively. Moderately embryotoxic compounds valproic acid, boric acid, methoxyacetic acid, and lithium chloride resulted in a correct ranking with REP values of 0.01 ± 0.003, 0.001 ± 0.001, 0.0007 ± 0.001, and 0.0006 ± 0.0004, respectively. The included nonembryotoxic compounds Penicillin G, acrylamide, and saccharin did not result in an inhibition of D3 cells to differentiate into cardiomyocytes, other than related to cytotoxicity (REP value of 0.00001). However, diphenhydramine resulted in an inhibitory effect similarly to the strong embryotoxic compound hydroxyurea, with a REP value of 0.40 ± 0.36. However, further evaluation suggested this was due to direct inhibition of the contractile capacity of the D3 cardiomyocytes, rather than an embryotoxic mechanism. The 96-well based EST is a promising addition to the screening process of newly developed chemicals and pharmaceuticals.
ÐPluripotent embryonic stem cells (ES cells) of the mouse (cell-line D3) can be maintained in the undierentiated state in the presence of LIF (Leukaemia Inhibitory Factor). Upon withdrawal of LIF, these cells dierentiate into various cell types under appropriate conditions. This property of ES cells allowed us to develop an in vitro embryotoxicity test, the Embryonic Stem Cell Test (EST; In Vitro Toxicology 1997, 10, 119±127), which does not require taking embryonic cells or tissues from pregnant animals. In the EST, the eect of test chemicals on three endpoints is assessed: inhibition of the dierentiation of ES cells into contracting myocard, cytotoxicity in ES cells and cytotoxicity in mouse 3T3 ®broblasts, which are serving as dierentiated cells in the test. The results of a prevalidation study of the EST are described, which was conducted according to the ECVAM prevalidation scheme. In the ®rst stage of the study (Phase I), a standard operating procedure (SOP) was elaborated. In the second phase (Phase II), the interlaboratory transferability of the EST was assessed using three test chemicals representing three classes of embryotoxicity (a strong, a weak and a non-embryotoxic chemical) in two European laboratories (ZEBET at the BgVV in Berlin, Germany; ECVAM at the JRC in Ispra, Italy) and one US laboratory (Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) in Gaithersburgh, MA, USA). In the ®nal stage of prevalidation (Phase III), nine test chemicals and a positive control were tested under blind conditions at ZEBET and ECVAM. The statistical evaluation of the results led to the development of an improved prediction model for the EST.
Use of Murine Embryonic Stem Cells in Embryotoxicity Assays: The Embryonic Stem Cell Test
Embryonic Stem Cell Protocols, 2006
The embryonic stem cell test (EST) takes advantage of the potential of murine embryonic stem (ES) cells to differentiate in culture to test embryotoxicity in vitro. The EST represents a scientifically validated in vitro system for the classification of compounds according to their teratogenic potential based on the morphological analysis of beating cardiomyocytes in embryoid body outgrowths compared to cytotoxic effects on murine ES cells and differentiated 3T3 fibroblasts. Through a number of prevalidation and validation studies, the EST has been demonstrated to be a reliable alternative method for embryotoxicity testing based on the most important mechanisms in embryotoxicity-cytotoxicity and differentiationas well as on differences in sensitivity between differentiated and embryonic tissues. Improvements of the EST protocol using flow cytometry analysis showed that differential expression of sarcomeric myosin heavy chain and α-actinin proteins quantified under the influence of a test compound is a useful marker for detecting potential teratogenicity. The in vitro embryotoxicity test described in this chapter is rapid, simple, and sensitive and can be usefully employed as a component of the risk/hazard assessment process. . Pipetting scheme for the cytotoxicity assay. One test chemical per plate is used (the positive control is placed next to the lowest test concentration).
Evaluation of an alternative in vitro test battery for detecting reproductive toxicants
Reproductive Toxicology, 2013
The application of alternative methods in developmental and reproductive toxicology is challenging in view of the complexity of mechanisms involved. A battery of complementary test systems may provide a better prediction of developmental and reproductive toxicity than single assays. We tested twelve compounds with varying mechanisms of toxic action in an assay battery including 24 CALUX transcriptional activation assays, mouse cardiac embryonic stem cell test, ReProGlo assay, zebrafish embryotoxicity assay, and two CYP17 and two CYP19 activity assays. The battery correctly detected 11/12 compounds tested, with one false negative occurring, which could be explained by the absence of the specific mechanism of action of this compound in the battery. Toxicokinetic modeling revealed that toxic concentrations were in the range expected from in vivo reproductive toxicity data. This study illustrates added value of combining assays that contain complementary biological processes and mechanisms, increasing predictive value of the battery over individual assays.
Assessment of Developmental Toxicants using Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Toxicological research, 2013
Embryonic stem (ES) cells have potential for use in evaluation of developmental toxicity because they are generated in large numbers and differentiate into three germ layers following formation of embryoid bodies (EBs). In earlier study, embryonic stem cell test (EST) was established for assessment of the embryotoxic potential of compounds. Using EBs indicating the onset of differentiation of mouse ES cells, many toxicologists have refined the developmental toxicity of a variety of compounds. However, due to some limitation of the EST method resulting from species-specific differences between humans and mouse, it is an incomplete approach. In this regard, we examined the effects of several developmental toxic chemicals on formation of EBs using human ES cells. Although human ES cells are fastidious in culture and differentiation, we concluded that the relevancy of our experimental method is more accurate than that of EST using mouse ES cells. These types of studies could extend our ...