Camera Surveillance In The Netherlands (original) (raw)
Related papers
Surveillance as a Service? On the Use of Surveillance Data for Administrative Purposes
European Data Protection: Coming of Age, 2012
and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.-Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research-You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain-You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Bodycamera use in Dutch surveillance practices
The bodycamera is a wearable camera developed specifically for professionals in the field of public order and safety, such as police officers. The process of development of this camera was analysed, starting from policymakers who came up with the idea, to designers who were responsible for implementation of the ideas of policymakers, and finally to police officers who took part in trials of use of this camera during nightly surveillance shifts. The central question being: how does the bodycam alters police-practices and nightly public space? Where a police officer would normally encounter nighttime visitors in a face to face situation, thus creating a clear role in that encounter, now the bodycamera enters this encounter, potentially altering roles between police and citizen. From the point of view of the police-officer, new tasks include filming and recording these encounters and informing citizens about the presence of this camera.
Status and media use in the Netherlands
Poetics, 2007
Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
The functioning of the public sector gives rise to considerable debate. Not only the efficiency and efficacy of the sector are at stake, but also its legitimacy. At the same time we see that in the public sector all kinds of innovations are taking place. These innovations are not only technological, which enable the redesign of all kinds of processes, like service delivery. The emphasis can also be put on more organizational and conceptual innovations. In this series we will try to understand the nature of a wide variety of innovations taking place in the public sector of the 21st century and try to evaluate their outcomes. How do they take place? What are relevant triggers? And, how are their outcomes being shaped by all kinds of actors and influences? And, do public innovations differ from innovations in the private sector? Moreover we try to assess the actual effects of these innovations, not only from an instrumental point of view, but also from a more institutional point of view. Do these innovations not only contribute to a better functioning of the public sector, but do they also challenge grown practices and vested interests? And what does this imply for the management of public sector innovations?
Contents p. 10 p. 24 Urban Geography p. 32 Science and Technology Studies p. 38 Surveillance Studies p. 54 Conceptual framework p. 56 Research questions p. 58 Research methods and outline p. 68 Chapter 2 Observations in Dutch nightscapes p. 70 Introduction: Three Dutch nightscapes p. 72 Methods of mapping and observing p. 78 Three nightscapes p. 98 Conclusions p. Chapter 3 Mobile cameras as new technologies of surveillance? p. Introduction: Nightlife and technologies of safety p. Participation and surveillance: New questions for the public nightscape p. Theoretical framework p. Methods p. Script analysis of a mobile camera p. On users and mobile phone camera practice p. Conclusions CONTENTS P. 11 p. Chapter 5 Policy, design and use of police-worn bodycams p. Introduction p. Theoretical starting points p. Methods of inquiry p. The bodycamera according to policy makers p. The bodycamera according to designers p. The bodycamera according to users p. Conclusions p. Discussion: the bodycamera as standard equipment? p. Chapter 6 Engaging stakeholders in a debate around Dutch surveillance technology p. Introduction: Responsible Innovation in surveillance p. On methods p. Technology mapping p. The influence of technology in the nightscape p. Assessing scenarios on surveillance futures p. An analysis of stakeholders' views of the Dutch surveillance landscape p. Reflections on CTA p. 246 Chapter 7 Conclusions, reflections and recommendations p. 247 Revisiting the research questions p. 250 Summary of findings and answering the subquestion p. 260 Reflections on theory p. 268 Notes on methods and approaches p. 272 Recommendations for the governance of Dutch surveillance practices p. 276 References p. 290 List of Figures p. 294 Appendices p. 295 Appendix A: Description of observation protocol and the developed method booklets (static and dynamic) p. 300 Appendix B: list of facilities p. 301 Appendix C: Intervention protocol p. 304 Appendix D: Semi-structured interview question list p. 306
Individual Rights in Video Surveillance Areas: A European Perspective
Surveillance of public areas has been an issue of fierce debate in the previous decades. Today’s advanced technologies are increasingly enabling private and public sector organizations to capture, store, and process information about individuals and their activities. This situation raises important questions about civil liberties, privacy, and ethical conduct while using such technologies. On the one hand, advantages of CCTVs (Closed Circuit Television Systems) include public safety, crime prevention, reduced levels of fear of crime, and trust for justice. On the other hand, disadvantages of CCTVs involve human rights violations, privacy invasion, and intrusion into the private lives of citizens. From the governments’ and private companies’ perspective, surveillance serves well their pursuit of justice and security. Nevertheless, they cannot capture, process, and store sensitive data while crushing individual rights. Security and civil liberties are not mutually exclusive as long as we strike a fine balance between these values. This report is composed of two parts. The first part summarizes the data protection rules for visual data in a list of selected countries. The second part centers on individual rights, mainly focusing on the right to private life, the right to control information about oneself, the right to anonymity, the right to secrecy, the right to not being tracked, and the right to be forgotten. By highlighting these rights, this report stresses the importance of following a rights-based approach in processing personal data in order to prevent unnecessary, unlawful, and unethical invasions of privacy and other individual rights.
Journal of Politics and Law, 2017
The flexible deployment of drones in the public domain, is in this article assessed from a legal philosophical perspective. On the basis of theories of Dworkin and Moore the distinction between individual rights and collective security policy goals is discussed. Mobile cameras in the public domain reflect how innovative technological tools challenge public authorities in new ways to balance between privacy and security. Furthermore, the different dimensions of privacy and the distinction between the three types of the value of privacy are reviewed. On the basis of the case study of the Dutch Drones Act, the article concludes that the flexible deployment of mobile cameras in the public domain is not legitimate from a normative perspective. The legal safeguards in the Netherlands are insufficient to protect the value of privacy. Therefore, further restrictions such as prior judicial review should be considered.