Shifting Allegiances and the Questions of Resilience: Lords of the Hungarian and Transylvanian Border during the Fortress Wars of 1560's (original) (raw)
2021, Politics and Society in Central and South-East Europe. Life Under the Shadow of the Ottoman Empire's Expansion (15th - 16th Centuries). Ed.: Zsuzsanna Kopeczny. Cluj-Napoca.
Although the rule of Szapolyai dynasty was restored in Transylvania in 1556, the exact border between the territories ruled King John Sigismund, the elected King of Hungary and King Ferdinand I and Maximillian I of the Habsburg dynasty had remained ambiguous. This study aims to examine the nature of allegiances and political attitudes of the landlords in the region during the decade-long Fortress Wars of the Northeast commencing in the border region stretching from Kassa (Košice, SK) to Szatmár (Satu Mare, RO). Control over the border area changed multiple times within the course of months in 1556, 1562, 1564 and 1565, and all these conquests were realized with large armies deployed to the region only for the being. In case of these local lords, applying the concept of resilience – the capacity of the individual or group to adapt to new situations caused by external factors – would be a fitting term as their withstanding loyalty or defection to the other side was not inevitable the result of their true political convictions. A lesser noble could have changed his loyalty not because of careful considerations of long-term consequences or long-standing convictions, but due to suddenly changing political and military environment forcing him to reconsider his stance in view of his and the region’s interest reshaped by the new circumstances. However, his new stance cannot be regarded as final, as new turn of events would soon make him reconsider his position. The study also lists the units involved in the hostilities and gives an overview on their numbers, also taking the German mercenaries and their numbers into consideration.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
East European History Review, 2022
A few years after the Long Turkish War began, Sigismund Báthory, ruler of the Transylvania, decided to join the Habsburgs and the other members of the Holly League in their war against the Ottomans. Through this political decision Báthory ceased to be a vassal of the Turkish sultan, interrupting thus several decades of good relations between his country and the Porte. Although Transylvania was a rather small state, with limited military and economic potential, Prince Sigismund had great ambitions. He was able to attract the rulers of Moldavia and Wallachia on his side and attacked the Ottoman Empire on three fronts. In this article I will analyse the military operations on the frontier of Transylvania with the Ottoman province (eyalet) of Timișoara (Temeşvar). The various forms of regular and irregular warfare employed by the two opponents show the complexity of this confrontation. Major campaigns and sieges, which involved large numbers of combatants, were accompanied by frequent raids and skirmishes, typical for border warfare. These events also reveal the specific social and economic dynamic of frontiers in early modern Central and South-Eastern Europe.
Initial. A Review of Medieval Studies, 2017
By reassessing the sources and the present-day dominant histo-riographical discourse pertaining to social and political reactions to the Ottoman conquest of Bosnia and subsequent clashes in the surrounding territories, the author proposes a more complex approach to such issues by applying a modified theory and methodological background stemming from the frontier thesis. The paper suggests a diversity of experiences of the frontier established by the ultimate Ottoman-Hungarian duality as opposed to current uniform interpretations based on the notions of defense, war, exclusive enmities, the demographic, economic and generally social catastrophes and similar phenomena. By focusing on the individuals and several examples related to policies of King Matthias Corvi-nus, it proposes that the reactions to the Ottoman presence should not be observed heterogeneously, but that, as the examples show, the downfall of the Bosnian pol-ity brought positive results for some members of society and, thus, a notion of variety of individual mechanisms, social practices, and political agendas should be considered when investigating the period. Ultimately, a similar theoretical framework could be applied regardless of the period or the territory in question.
Ulrich A. Wien (ed.), Common Man, Society and Religion in the 16th century/Gemeiner Mann, Gesellschaft und Religion im 16. Jahrhundert Piety, morality and discipline in the Carpathian Basin/Frömmigkeit, Moral und Sozialdisziplinierung im Karpatenbogen (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2021), 2021
This article is based on the premise that some innovative aspects of warfare and military organization are strongly linked to Early Modern Religious Reformation and Counter-Reformation. In order to identify these links I have analysed several military regulations issued by Transylvanian rulers during the Sixteenth and the Seventeenth Centuries. By means of my research I will try to answer two important questions: What were the means used to establish and enforce military discipline in early modern Transylvanian armies? And what was the role of religion in the process of establishing and maintaining military discipline? War and religion in Sixteenth and Seventeenth century Europe have been a constant focus for historians over the last decades generating many insightful monographs and studies. However, the Transylvanian principality in particular, and Central and Eastern Europe in general, received less attention from this point of view.
Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies, 2024
This article aims to provide an overview of the early modern processes of military innovation and adaptation in Transylvania, focusing particularly on the influence of foreign practices. A former province of the Hungarian Kingdom, Transylvania underwent significant transformation during the second half of the 16th century, emerging as a distinct polity under the suzerainty of the Ottoman Empire. The political and geographical context of this borderland region, shaped by the intense rivalry between the Ottoman Empire and the Habsburg Monarchy, played a critical role in defining the military organisation of the nascent state. The armed forces of the Transylvanian rulers were marked by enduring medieval traditions and customs, especially in terms of recruitment, mobilization and organization. However, some innovations, coming from neighbouring war cultures, were introduced and adapted during the decades following the Ottoman conquest of Buda (1541). The evolution of recruitment methods, the increasing importance of light cavalry and irregular warfare and the evolution of infantry between western and oriental models are some of the most important topics approached in my analysis.
Ed. Corinne Leveleux-Teixeira; Fulvio Delle Donne. Potenza, University of Basilicata Press, pp. 135-156. , 2023
A symbolic motive in Hungarian historical mythology is the preservation of sovereignty in order that not be subordinated to any overlordship. The rulers sought to earn equal status to any Christian monarch-and recognized as equals. The article is to give an overview of the means of upholding independence, from 'familiar' dynastic policy through harboring claimants to preventive campaigns. There was a pragmatic ideology constructed to preserve stability within a balance of powers. In the conceptual framework of regnum Hungariae the country was seen as 'queen' of all monarchies, having several members under St. Stephen's crown, incorporated within tota Hungaria and dependent as members. The fidelity of the members was to be preserved once and for all, the methods and fields of which (i.e. representation, legislation, narrative sources) are seen in detail, particularly highlighting King Andrew II's (1205-35) ambitions.
Territorial Identity and Development, 2021
The last decades have witnessed an increased interest in the research of territorial delimitations in late medieval and early modern Europe. A significant part of the academic debate has been focused on identifying and defining the process of transition from medieval frontiers, perceived as vague areas of contact, to modern linear borders. The aim of this article is to analyse the organisation of the western confines of the Transylvanian Principality duri ng the decades in which this state was formed, from the Ottoman conquest of Buda (1541) until the ratification of the Speyer Peace Treaty (1571). Throughout this period, the territorial delimitation of Transylvania from the Ottoman Empire and Habsburg Hungary was an ongoing process, marked by both military confrontations and diplomatic negotiations. Through a critical reassessment of the most relevant Romanian and Hungarian literature on this complex subject and the analysis of new data from official and narrative contemporary sources, I have tried to identify which were the most important political and military events that shaped the western borderlands of Transylvania. A fundamental objective of my research is to provide an accurate definition for the western region of the Transylvanian Principality, contributing thus to the general debate on the nature of frontiers/borders in sixteenth century Europe.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.