A multi-institutional phase II trial of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (original) (raw)

A phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

Cancer, 2003

BACKGROUNDThe objectives of the current study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in patients with unresectable (Stage T4 or ≥ N1) metastatic or locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelial tract.The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in patients with unresectable (Stage T4 or ≥ N1) metastatic or locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelial tract.METHODSA total of 27 patients were enrolled in the current multisite study, which was performed within the University of California-Los Angeles Community Oncology Research Network. The first 10 patients in the study received 800 mg/m2 of gemcitabine intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day treatment cycle. In addition, on Day 1, the first 10 patients received 80 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously after completion of the gemcitabine infusion. Because of dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia), the initial dose of docetaxel was reduced to 60 mg/m2 for the remaining patients who entered the study (n = 17 patients).A total of 27 patients were enrolled in the current multisite study, which was performed within the University of California-Los Angeles Community Oncology Research Network. The first 10 patients in the study received 800 mg/m2 of gemcitabine intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day treatment cycle. In addition, on Day 1, the first 10 patients received 80 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously after completion of the gemcitabine infusion. Because of dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia), the initial dose of docetaxel was reduced to 60 mg/m2 for the remaining patients who entered the study (n = 17 patients).RESULTSNeutropenia was the most common adverse event that occurred in patients at the Grade 3 level (in 10 of 27 patients; 37.0%) and the Grade 4 level (in 6 of 27 patients; 22.2%). There were no other adverse events at the Grade 4 toxicity level. Twenty-five of 27 patients (92.6%) completed more than 1 cycle of combination therapy and were evaluated for antitumor responses. The frequency of objective clinical responses was 33.3% (9 of 27 patients). Complete responses to therapy were observed in 2 of 27 patients (7.4%), and partial responses were observed in 7 of 27 patients (25.9%). The median duration of response was 20 weeks (range, 12+ weeks to 152 weeks). The median survival duration was 52 weeks (range, 12 weeks to 160+ weeks). Four of 27 patients (14.8%) remained alive at the time of the current data analysis.Neutropenia was the most common adverse event that occurred in patients at the Grade 3 level (in 10 of 27 patients; 37.0%) and the Grade 4 level (in 6 of 27 patients; 22.2%). There were no other adverse events at the Grade 4 toxicity level. Twenty-five of 27 patients (92.6%) completed more than 1 cycle of combination therapy and were evaluated for antitumor responses. The frequency of objective clinical responses was 33.3% (9 of 27 patients). Complete responses to therapy were observed in 2 of 27 patients (7.4%), and partial responses were observed in 7 of 27 patients (25.9%). The median duration of response was 20 weeks (range, 12+ weeks to 152 weeks). The median survival duration was 52 weeks (range, 12 weeks to 160+ weeks). Four of 27 patients (14.8%) remained alive at the time of the current data analysis.CONCLUSIONSThe results of the current study suggested that combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel was an effective treatment for patients with unresectable (Stage T4 or ≥ N1) metastatic or locally advanced TCC of the urothelial tract. Gemcitabine plus docetaxel appeared to be tolerated well, and treatment-related toxicities were limited to hematologic toxicities. Because cisplatin-containing regimens are contraindicated for patients with impaired renal function, the gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination may prove to be an effective and well tolerated treatment option for these patients. Cancer 2003. © 2003 American Cancer Society.The results of the current study suggested that combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel was an effective treatment for patients with unresectable (Stage T4 or ≥ N1) metastatic or locally advanced TCC of the urothelial tract. Gemcitabine plus docetaxel appeared to be tolerated well, and treatment-related toxicities were limited to hematologic toxicities. Because cisplatin-containing regimens are contraindicated for patients with impaired renal function, the gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination may prove to be an effective and well tolerated treatment option for these patients. Cancer 2003. © 2003 American Cancer Society.

Pretreatment prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced urothelial tumors treated in a phase I/II trial with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine

Cancer, 2002

BACKGROUND. New chemotherapeutic agents, including paclitaxel and gemcitabine, are active in advanced bladder carcinoma, and combination regimens with these agents have shown promising results. Unlike conventional chemotherapy regimens, such as methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin , there are no data available on key predictive factors for response and survival with these novel agents. Since this information is needed for selection of patients for these new combinations and for stratification purposes in ongoing randomized trials, the authors aimed to study the predictive factors for response and survival to the current regimen containing cisplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine.

Do patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma benefit from weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy? A GETUG phase II study

2009

Despite the effectiveness of chemotherapy, the treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer remains palliative and most patients will relapse. First-line cisplatin-based combinations are associated with clinical remission in 50% of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. 1 Recently, gemcitabine and cisplatin have been shown to provide a disease control rate and survival benefit similar to that of standard MVAC (methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/ cisplatin) but less toxicity. There is no established standard chemotherapy for use in patients failing platinum-based regimens. 3 However, a proportion of them are fit enough to be considered for second-line chemotherapy. In this situation, the goal of salvage therapy is to improve quality of life (QOL) rather than to increase survival rate. Therefore, active agents, with a favorable toxicity profile and that might induce clinical benefit, remain of interest.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma: a phase II study

British journal of cancer, 2005

The purpose of the study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma. Patients with previously untreated, locally advanced/recurrent or metastatic urothelial carcinoma stage-IV disease were eligible. Patients with Performance status: PS ECOG >3 or age >75 years or creatinine clearance <50 ml min(-1) were excluded. Study treatment consisted of docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) (day 8) and gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) (days 1+8), every 21 days for a total of six to nine cycles. A total of 31 patients with urothelial bladder cancer, 25 men and six women, aged 42-74 (median 64) years were enrolled. The majority of patients had a good PS (51.6%; PS 0). In all, 15 (48.3%) patients had locally advanced or recurrent disease only and 16 (54.8%) presented with distant metastatic spread, with multiple site involvement in 22.5%. Toxicity was primarily haematologic, and the most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities we...

Sequential Therapy with Gemcitabine and Carboplatin Followed by Paclitaxel as First Line Treatment for Advanced Urothelial Cancer

Journal of Cancer, 2012

Objective: Gemcitabine and platinum-based compounds represent the new standard combination therapy for bladder cancer. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and carboplatin followed sequentially by paclitaxel in 27 patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma. Methods: This phase II multicentre study was based on the doublet gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for 4 cycles, followed sequentially by paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 /w for 12 consecutive weeks. The disease was assessed after each sequence.

Gemcitabine/paclitaxel-based three-drug regimens in advanced urothelial cancer

European Journal of Cancer, 2000

Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium is a highly chemosensitive tumour. Combination chemotherapy can provide both palliation and a modest survival advantage in patients with advanced disease. At present, the combination of cisplatin, methotrexate, doxorubicin and vinblastine (M-VAC) is the most widely used for advanced TCC with an overall response rate of 40± 72% in phase II, and 35±45% in phase III studies, and a median survival of approximately 12 months. These modest results and the unsuccessful attempts to increase ecacy with dose intensive M-VAC schedules have prompted the identi®cation of new active agents in TCC, such as the taxanes and gemcitabine. The overall response rates for two-drug regimens of cisplatin±paclitaxel, car-boplatin±paclitaxel and cisplatin±gemcitabine range from 63 to 72%, 14 to 65% and 42 to 66%, respectively. The overall response rates for platinum±paclitaxel±gemcitabine three-drug regimens range from 58 to 80%. The potential clinical bene®t of these new three-drug combinations in the treatment of TCC needs to be tested in future phase III studies. # -drug regimen chemotherapy; Three-drug regimen chemotherapy 0959-8049/00/$ -see front matter # 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. P I I : S 0 9 5 9 -8 0 4 9 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 0 8 1 -2