Key Trends in Institutional Changes Under Sustainable Development (original) (raw)
Related papers
Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2008
The main aim of this article is to provide a basis for changing the focus in New Institutional Economics (NIE) from the economic effects of institutions to the importance of “institutional capital” for sustainable development. First, a theoretical model of NIE is presented in the context of sustainable development. Then, the concept of an institutional equilibrium (where informal institutions support and strengthen formal institutions) is discussed as an important determinant of “institutional capital” stimulating or hampering sustainable development. Santrauka Šio straipsnio tikslas – pateikti naujos institucinės ekonomikos (NIE) pokyčius, kai pastebimas perėjimas nuo ekonominių institucijų efektų prie institucinio kapitalo plėtotės darnaus vystymosi kontekste. Visų pirma autorius pateikia teorinį NIE modelį darnaus vystymosi aplinkoje. Vėliau nagrinėjama institucinės pusiausvyros koncepcija (atvejis, kada neformalios institucijos palaiko ir stiprina formaliąsias institucijas). Aut...
Institutional Theory and Integrated Accounting
2021
We focused on one of the closest to our subject area of research theory, i.e., institutional theory. The application of its tools will allow a comprehensive approach to the development of accounting, analytical and control support of entity’s payment transactions and will determine its impact on the formation of reporting information, will highlight the factor of uncertainty in the implementation of payment transactions. The authors of the article characterize modern perspective directions of accounting development. The possibility of their achievement using the institutional approach is substantiated. The main ideas of institutionalism are highlighted, which can be applied to the development of the methodology of accounting, analytical and control support of payment transactions.
Public Accounting Reform from Institutional Theory Perspectives: Case of Turkey
Accounting and Corporate Reporting - Today and Tomorrow
In the literature, it is often found that institutional theory is used as the theoretical framework to explain the development and application of accounting. By means of these studies, it becomes easier to understand accounting as a social and political activity within itself and thus to be able to understand the economic, institutional, political and social environment of the turnover of the practices. In this regard, the main aim of this study is to explain the development of the public accounting system in Turkey with the help of institutional theory. Thus, it is aimed to explain all the dynamics that provide the institutionalization of state account in the national sense, together with the economic, political and social processes of the period in question. It is revealed that the regulatory arrangements directly contribute to the institutionalization of a field, and as a result, how the public organizations directly contribute to the institutionalization process.
Institutions and Decision Making for Sustainable Development
2002
Economic theory provides a coherent framework for analysing the elements of growth and sustainable development. Robust policies and appropriate institutional structures are essential to achieving sustainable development. Environmental problems are rooted in failed markets and their resolution requires government taking some kind of action – to establish property rights, set standards of liability, apply polluter pays taxes, or regulate. There is ample evidence showing that market based instruments can achieve the same environmental outcome at considerably less cost relative to command and control. Rational policy must seriously consider the use of market-based instruments. A framework for considering the quality of institutional structures vis-à-vis achieving sustainable development is presented. The framework is applied to aspects of the Resource Management Act 1991. Although the Act aims to promote sustainable management it is the primary legal foundation for sustainable developme...
SuStainable deVeloPMent and PerforMance of inStitutionS: aPProacHeS toWardS MeaSureMent
The aim of this paper is to estimate and to compare sustainable development processes in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia focusing on institutional dimension of sustainable development. Attention has been focused on the selection of system of indicators with particular emphasis on institutional indicators. The authors employ the most popular two multicriteria methods: Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and multi-criteria complex proportional method (MCP). Data embracing 2004-2010 year period is being analyzed. In order to obtain a multi-faceted view, several variants of sustainable development estimations of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia are being performed. Each variant represents a different approach to development perception. The difference lies in emphasis, which is being put on the economic and institutional aspects of development. Hypothesis has been raised that the different methods employed may affect comparison results.
Is Sustainable Development Conceivable without Institutions? Evidences from Romania
Majority of the economic literature acknowledge the fact that the ability of a country to follow sustainable development paths largely depends on the quality of its institutional structures. In other words, efficient institutions are essential to achieving sustainable development. This paper aims at analyzing the relationship between institutions and sustainable development in Romania. The first part of the paper gives a descriptive presentation of the key issues related to sustainable development and its determinants, focusing on the role of institutions. This framework will be applied to aspects regarding the institutional arrangements in Romanian economy in order to evaluate its ability to achieve sustainable development. There will be analyzed several governance indicators (data measuring aspects of governance such as Voice and Accountability, Rule of Law etc.) and indicators of sustainable development (such as the level of incomes, number of jobs, land coverage and environment etc.). Starting from the premise that it is not the increasing number of created institutions which really matters but developing good institutions which enhance progress and economic growth, we will subsequently focus on policies and strategies for improving and strengthening the existing institutions in order to support sustainable development.
ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL REVIEW
International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 2016
The appearance of sustainable development as the complex perception of social and environmental issues which must be addressed had a growing influence in the accounting practice. The main purpose of this paper is to analyze how Environmental accounting can able to contribute for ensuring sustainable development. The study used existing empirical literature especially it has conducted general search by the name of environmental accounting application in the sustinable development in different online database sources such as Science Direct, Emerald full text, Scopus and Google Scholars etc. The study summarized from the review findings that proper practice of environmental accounting is a vital issue for sustainable development especially to concentrate on environmental taxes,
Innovationssysteme und Wohlstandsentwicklung in der Welt
Although the socioeconomic development of many nations during the last two centuries has been very impressive, there are many issues questioning the sustainability of this development. Questions have been raised whether increased consumption will lead to increased happiness, or whether people will become more dependent on growth (Galbraith, 1958). While the so-called consumption society may lead to questionable results for social welfare, the increased use of natural resource and problems of waste, pollution, lack of regeneration of renewable resources and too slow progress in finding substitutes for non-renewable resources pose increasing threats for environmental sustainability (Boulding, 1966; Rao, 2000). These issues are slowly being recognized. The focus in this article is on the need for institutional change for entering a path of more sustainable (or, less unsustainable) development in the context of the seemingly infinite need for increased production and welfare. Arguments will be provided that the New Institutional Economics (NIE) may be useful in creating a theory of institutional change, strengthening society's capacity and capability for sustainable development (SD). However, without changing paradigms (worldviews) that growth is necessary and, in combination with technological advance, a mean to solve social and environmental problems, there are incredible challenges in entering a path of SD. First, some conditions for NIE to become a theory on society's capacity and capability for SD will be discussed in the context of its current focus on economic and environmental issues. Then, the notion of institutional capital will be developed and some of its determinant presented (value in the public domain, institutional strength, good governance, an institutional equilibrium). The level of transaction costs and assignment of property rights seem to be crucial for the process of institutional change. Finally, it will be argued that with the current techno-centric paradigm, when technological advance is too slow, there exists a danger that SD will become, at most, a kind of club good.