Judicial Training Needs and Judicial Training Academies' Capacity Assessment - Pakistan (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Pakistan Bar Council Legal Education Rules 2015: A Commentary
Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research
Legal education is considered the backbone for producing legal professionals who can ultimately contribute their services to society. The legal profession, as a career choice, has been attracting more and more people over the years. In Pakistan, the legal education is regulated by the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) and the Higher Education Commission (HEC). Pakistan is one of the many countries which have a particular set of rules under which legal education is imparted, Pakistan Bar Council Legal Education Rules (PBCLER) 2015. In 2007, the Supreme Court of Pakistan delivered a historic judgment that led to the improvement of legal education based on a petition filed by the PBC. Pursuant to the views expressed in the judgment based on PBC's considerations, the PBCLER 2015 was designed and implemented. However, there have been a lot of concerns raised about these rules, especially with regard to legal education in Pakistan. In line with this, the current paper aims to analyze these rules by first identifying the strengths and weaknesses of these rules with regards to the quality of legal education. This analysis is supported by responses provided by selected respondents including members of the legal education committee of PBC, members of HEC and academicians. The paper concludes by making some recommendations for improvement of these rules.
Legal Education and Training Review research phase briefing and discussion papers
2013
Chapter 2: Legal education, professional standards and regulation 5. This chapter is an overview of developments to date, using the key reports on legal education and training, among them Ormrod (1971), Benson (1979), Marre (1988), the ACLEC Reports (1996), the Training Framework Review Reports (2003), and the Wood Report (2008)) to provide a chronological framework for understanding developments in the relationship between legal education, professional standards and regulation. It analyzes the reports' substantive content, and identifies educational and regulatory issues that were left unaddressed by them.
Legal Education and Training Review research phase literature review
2013
Chapter 2: Legal education, professional standards and regulation 5. This chapter is an overview of developments to date, using the key reports on legal education and training, among them Ormrod (1971), Benson (1979), Marre (1988), the ACLEC Reports (1996), the Training Framework Review Reports (2003), and the Wood Report (2008)) to provide a chronological framework for understanding developments in the relationship between legal education, professional standards and regulation. It analyzes the reports' substantive content, and identifies educational and regulatory issues that were left unaddressed by them.
2017
Adapting of existing qualifications to NQF and EQF requirements enables including them into NQF system in accordance with the provisions of the Law on National Qualification Framework. The end of the process of including of existing qualifications into NQF will allow to acknowledge that the NQF system has been established. To conduct the adapting process efficiently, a relevant methodology needs to be developed. These recommendations concern primarily procedures of adapting formal education qualifications not covered by the reforming projects and qualifications awarded outside formal education system. However, recommendations might be also useful for groups of experts currently and in the future involved in the reforms of the formal education programmes.
Legal Education in Pakistan: An Overview
IIUM Law Journal
Legal education in Pakistan was initiated before independence and dates back to the 1800s. The first legal education institution was established under the name of ‘University Law College’ in 1868. Currently, there are more than 150 institutions offering law programs, which include universities and law colleges. These institutions are regulated by the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) and Higher Education Commission (HEC). Over the past decades, there have been a lot of concerns raised on the quality assurance mechanism with regards to legal education in Pakistan. In line with this, the objectives of the current study is to identify and analyse the roles and responsibilities of the HEC and the PBC as regulators of legal education in the country as well as to identify the strengths and weaknesses within this regulatory system as a result of an overlapping of powers between the two bodies. The article ends with recommendations for improvement.
Legal Education and Training Review: a five-year retro/prospective
The Law Teacher, 2018
The Legal Education and Training Review final report on the regulation of legal services education and training was published n June 2013. Five years later, members of the research team reflect, in this article, on subsequent developments in the relationship between regulator and regulated. They explore the links between outcomes focused regulation (OFR) and the hierarchies within the regulatory space and between the OFR-driven focus on competence and its impacts on assessment for qualification and continuing competence thereafter. Finally, they extend the concept of shared space to include the relationship between regulators who commission research and researchers who carry it out. The paper concludes that the project has attracted international interest and informed other projects. Although there is already clear impact in England and Wales, the full significance of the report in the canon of seminal reports into legal education will emerge over the next decade.