Altered promoter recognition by mutant forms of the ?70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase*1 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Altered promoter recognition by mutant forms of the σ70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase
Journal of Molecular Biology, 1989
We have systematically assayed the in viva promoter recognition properties of 13 mutations in rpoD, the gene that encodes the 0" subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme, using transcriptional fusions to 37 mutant and wild-type promoters. We found three classes of rpoD mutations: (1) mutations that suggest contacts between amino acid side-chains of c" and specific bases in the promoter; (2) mutations that appear to affect either sequence independent contacts to promoter DNA or isomerization of the polymerase; and (3) mutations that have little or no effect on promoter recognition. Our results lead us to suggest that a sequence near the C terminus of cr", which is similar to the helix-turnhelix DNA binding motif of phage and bacterial DNA binding proteins, is responsible for recognition of the -35 region, and that a sequence internal to a", in a region which is highly conserved among Q factors, recognizes the -10 region of the promoter. rpoD mutations that lie in the recognition helix of the proposed helix-turn-helix motif affect interactions with specific bases in the -35 region, while mutations in the upstream helix, which is thought to contact the phosphate backbone, have sequence-independent effects on promoter recognition.
Promoter recognition by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase
Journal of Molecular Biology, 1989
The available evidence suggests that during the process of formation of a functional or "open" complex at a promoter, Escherichia coli RNA polymerase transiently realigns the two contacted regions of the promoter, thus stressing the intervening spacer DNA. We tested the possibility that this process plays an active role in the formation of an open complex. Two series of promoters were examined: one with spacer DNAs of 15 to 19 basepairs and a derivative for which the promoters additionally contained a one-base gap in the spacer, so as to relieve any stress imposed on the DNA. Consistent with an active role for the stressed DNA in driving open complex formation, we have found that for promoters with a 17-base-pair spacer, the presence of a gap leads to a delay in the formation of an open complex, at a step subsequent to the initial binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter. The results with the other gapped promoters rule out direct binding of RNA polymerase to the region of the gap and indicate an increased flexibility in the gapped DNA. As not all observations with the spacer length series of gapped and ungapped promoters can be interpreted in terms of an active role of the spacer DNA without additional assumptions, such a role must still be considered tentative.
Biochemistry, 1993
Escherichia coli promoters for transcription of ribosomal and tRNAs are greatly activated by an A+T-rich "UP" element upstream of the -35 region. These same promoters have also been found to otherwise deviate in several respects from the consensus promoter sequence. Here we present the results of a kinetic characterization of the interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with UP elementcontaining promoters which by virtue of consensus or near-consensus sequence features should be among the most optimal that can be encountered by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. We show that for such promoters, (1) the second-order rate constant describing formation of the initial (closed) complex is close to that expected for a diffusion-limited process, (2) the extent of activation by the UP element is temperaturesensitive, (3) the UP element accelerates a process after DNA binding by RNA polymerase, and (4) the presence of the UP element delays promoter clearance upon addition of nucleoside triphosphates to preformed RNA polymerase-promoter complexes. Finally, we provide evidence in support of models which describe the DNA melting process accompanying open complex formation as initiating in the -10 promoter region and progressing in the downstream direction.
Nucleic Acids Research, 1997
The C-terminal domain (CTD) downstream from residue 235 of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase α subunit is involved in recognition of the promoter UP element. Here we have demonstrated, by DNase I and hydroxyl radical mapping, the presence of two UP element subsites on the promoter D of phage T7, each located half and one-and-a-half helix turns, respectively, upstream from the promoter -35 element. This non-typical UP element retained its αCTD-binding capability when transferred into the genetic environment of the rrnBP1 basic promoter, leading to transcription stimulation as high as the typical rrnBP1 UP element. Chemical protease FeBABE conjugated to αCTD S309C efficiently attacked the T7D UP element but not the rrnBP1 UP element. After alanine scanning, most of the amino acid residues that were involved in rrnBP1 interaction were also found to be involved in T7D UP element recognition, but alanine substitution at three residues had the opposite effect on the transcription activation between rrnBP1 and T7D promoters. Mutation E286A stimulated T7D transcription but inhibited rrnBP1 RNA synthesis, while L290A and K304A stimulated transcription from rrnBP1 but not the T7D promoter. Taken together, we conclude that although the overall sets of amino acid residues responsible for interaction with the two UP elements overlap, the mode of αCTD interaction with T7D UP element is different from that with rrnBP1 UP element, involving different residues on helices III and IV.
E. coli RNA polymerase interacts homologously with two different promoters
Cell, 1980
We present and review experiments that identify points of close approach of the RNA polymerase to two promoters, lac UV5 and T7 A3. We identify the contacts to the phosphates along the DNA backbone, to the N7s of guanines in the major groove and the N3s of adenines in the minor groove, and to the methyl groups of thymines. These contacts to the two promoters are strikingly homologous in space, as shown on three-dimensional models, and identify major regions of interactions lying on one side of the DNA molecule (at-35 and-16), as well as further areas extending through the Pribnow box. Both promoters are unwound similarly by the polymerase, across a region of about twelve bases extending from the middle of the Pribnow box to just beyond the RNA start site. We discuss the areas of interaction in the context of promoter homologies and promoter mutations. The disposition of the contacts in space suggests a model for the pathway along which the RNA polymerase binds to promoters.
RNA-polymerase binding at the promoters of the rRNA genes of Escherichia coli
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Nucleic Acids and Protein Synthesis, 1980
The promoter region of two bacterial rRNA genes was investigated by electron-microscopic analysis of polymerase binding, transcription initiation and nitrocellulose filtration of RNA-polymerase-DNA complexes, using restriction endonuclease generated fragments of recombinant plasmids and a transducing phage. The following observations have been made: 1. Two transcription initiation sites have been located approximately 200 and 300 base pairs upstream from the beginning of the sequence coding for mature 16 S rRNA. 2. Polymerase binding at these sites can be observed electronmicroscopically and a 360 base-pair fragment containing these sites binds to nitrocellulose in the presence of RNA-polymerase. This complex dissociates even at moderately high (0.1-0.2 M) salt concentrations. Although transcription initiation is reported to be more frequent at the first of these sites, the binding is much stronger at the second site. 3. In the case of the rrnD gene, BamHI cleaves a few base pairs upstream from the first transcription start site. This cleavage destroys polymerase binding at this site but does not influence binding at the second site. 4. At higher polymerase/DNA ratio four weak but distinct and regularly spaced binding sites can be observed preceding the two initiation sites at approximately 1000, 820, 640 and 440 base pairs before the mature 16 S rRNA sequence. 5. An extremely strong binding site is located about 1300 base pairs upstream from the beginning of the 16 S rRNA sequence. Very little (if any) initiation occurs at this site. The possibility is discussed that the noninitiating binding sites preceding the two transcription start points might functionally belong to the promoter region.
Flexibility of the DNA enhances promoter affinity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase
The EMBO Journal, 1991
Communicated by W.Zillig Two types of mechanisms are discussed for the formation of active protein-DNA complexes: contacts with specific bases and interaction via specific DNA structures within the cognate DNA. We have studied the effect of a single nucleoside deletion on the interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with a strong promoter. This study reveals three patterns of interaction which can be attributed to different sites of the promoter, (i) direct base contact with the template strand in the '-35 region' (the 'recognition domain'), (ii) a DNA structure dependent interaction in the '-10 region' (the 'melting domain'), and (iii) an interaction which is based on a defined spatial relationship between the two domains of a promoter, namely the 'recognition domain' and the 'melting domain'.
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Synthetic 75-base pair promoters bearing base changes and/or base analog substitutions at selected positions were constructed. Using both abortive initiation and run-off transcription assays, the interaction of these altered promoters with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase was studied in order to determine the involvement of DNA functional groups in promoter recognition. Two adjacent thymines in the -35 region were identified whose 5-methyl groups play a crucial role. Additionally, the combined results from several substitution experiments showed that functional groups in the major groove of the strongly conserved T-A base pair at the -7 position are probable sites of direct interaction with RNA polymerase.
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1996
A set of 18 variant lac UV5 promoters was constructed, each carrying a single base substitution within the -35 region (nucleotide positions from -36 to -31 relative to the transcription start site). Using truncated DNA fragments carrying these variant promoters and purified Escherichia coil RNA polymerase holoenzyme, in vitro mixed transcription assays were performed to determine two parameters governing promoter strength: i.e., the binding affinity to RNA polymerase (parameter 1) and the rate of open complex formation (parameter 11). The following conclusions were drawn from the data presented: (1) Alteration in the promoter strength of variant promoters is dependent on both the position and base species of substitutions; (2) the consensus sequence (TTGACA) exhibits the highest values for both parameters; (3) base substitutions at nucleotide position -34 cause marked effect on both parameters; (4) cytosine at nucleotide position -32 can not be replaced with other nucleotides without significant reduction of the promoter strength; and (5) base substitution at nucleotide position -31 exerts only a little effect on parameter 1. All these findings were confirmed by abortive initiation assays.
Nucleic Acids Research, 2001
The C-terminal domain (CTD) downstream from residue 235 of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase α subunit is involved in recognition of the promoter UP element. Here we have demonstrated, by DNase I and hydroxyl radical mapping, the presence of two UP element subsites on the promoter D of phage T7, each located half and one-and-a-half helix turns, respectively, upstream from the promoter-35 element. This non-typical UP element retained its αCTD-binding capability when transferred into the genetic environment of the rrnBP1 basic promoter, leading to transcription stimulation as high as the typical rrnBP1 UP element. Chemical protease FeBABE conjugated to αCTD S309C efficiently attacked the T7D UP element but not the rrnBP1 UP element. After alanine scanning, most of the amino acid residues that were involved in rrnBP1 interaction were also found to be involved in T7D UP element recognition, but alanine substitution at three residues had the opposite effect on the transcription activation between rrnBP1 and T7D promoters. Mutation E286A stimulated T7D transcription but inhibited rrnBP1 RNA synthesis, while L290A and K304A stimulated transcription from rrnBP1 but not the T7D promoter. Taken together, we conclude that although the overall sets of amino acid residues responsible for interaction with the two UP elements overlap, the mode of αCTD interaction with T7D UP element is different from that with rrnBP1 UP element, involving different residues on helices III and IV.