The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and Parliamentary Regulatory Cooperation (original) (raw)
Related papers
The TTIP and Its Potential Effects over the Labor Force in the European Union
2017
The traditional relation between the European Union (EU) and the United States of America (USA) emerged in 2013 under the form of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations. After numerous rounds of talks, and taking into consideration the current political developments that characterize both of the powers involved, it appears that the process of reaching an agreement has unofficially stopped. Aiming towards a total liberalization of the transatlantic trade, the potential effects of the completely negotiated TTIP would affect the labor force on both sides of the Atlantic, both from the legal and administrative point of view. This situation could be developed in accordance to each of the 28 Member States current trade and investment situation with the USA, while for the other partner, the number of jobs created as a result of TTIP will reflect the individual trade situation of each of the 50 federal states with the European Union. If fully negotiated, rati...
The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) will follow EU and US recent trade policy practice to include labour provisions. These could limit the risk that liberalisation results in social dumping and promote upward change. This Policy Department A study concludes that the EU could take a precautionary stance and employ various instruments that increase the chances that TTIP will have positive social consequences. TTIP may combine the strengths of the EU and US approaches to labour provisions, while improving their weaknesses. More analysis of the social consequences of liberalisation and labour provisions might be stimulated and strong flanking measures at the EU and national level be foreseen.
The Quest for a New Generation of Labor Chapter in the TTIP
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
The TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement) may be key for the EU-USA forthcoming vision of labor and industrial relations. The TTIP may be turned into an opportunity to ground a new generation of labor chapters in investment/partnership treaties. In line with preliminary outputs, a practical proposal is introduced. This essay is also aimed at analyzing, under a critical legal approach, why, to what extent and how the TTIP labor chapter may be set up. A special focus on the TTIP and ISDS in labor items is included.
Challenges and Possible Consequences of Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
Journal of Business and Economics, 2015
In recent years, European Union (EU) and the United States (US) change their trade policy and also they began negotiations for signing the most comprehensive free trade agreement. Its negotiations began in the second half of 2013 and called Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), whose key points are transparency, coherence and non-discriminatory. With these type of qualifications, EU's and US's administratives believe that this partnership will boost economic power and not only for EU and US, but also all countries in the world benefit from the outputs of the agreement. On the other hand, although their intensions are widely same direction, sometimes controversial platforms occur, because both parties do not want to change their implementations at some topics such as conformity assessments, genetically modified products and hormone treated meat. Accordingly, the objective of this paper is to identify mainly the key challenges of the TTIP with qualitative and quantitative data. Descriptive analysis of the data will be displayed. The agreement has two main body as horizontal side which means regulatory cooperation and sectoral side. In this paper, regulatory cooperation and its context are pointed to be essential subjects for why sectoral side has more details and it is hard to explain all circumstances in sectors. After focusing on the reasons of the existence of the TTIP, the need will be explained. Then the main elements, such as market access, regulatory coherence and improved cooperations, are mentioned. As a conclusion, mostly recommendations and expectations take part because of the fact that negotiations are going on.
Labour Clauses in the TPP and TTIP: A Comparison without a Difference?
Melbourne Journal of International Law, 2016
This article provides a critical analysis of the labour clauses in trade agreements, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership ('TPP'). This analysis is based on four dimensions of labour clauses in trade agreements: their purposes, the legal nature of the clauses (whether binding or not), the substance of legal obligations imposed and the institutional processes provided for. The analysis is also grounded in the two dominant approaches to these clauses, the European Union and the pre-Trump United States approaches: the former can be understood as proposing a broad agenda based on promotional measures while the latter is underpinned by a narrow agenda based on conditional measures. The TPP's labour clause clearly adopts a pre-Trump US approach and the divergence between the EU and pre-Trump US approaches is highlighted by the labour clauses of the TPP and the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. However, it is unclear whether this (possible) difference ...