Minimally Invasive Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty (original) (raw)
Related papers
Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA)
The Knee, 2009
This study was designed to provide evidence that computer-navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS CN-TKA) enables identical mechanical accuracy as conventional computer navigated total knee arthroplasty (CN-TKA) while reducing rehabilitation time and hospital stay of the patients. Two groups of 20 patients requiring total knee arthroplasty due to degenerative or posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis were included. Twenty consecutive patients received conventional CN-TKA and 20 consecutive patients received minimally invasive CN-TKA. Mechanical and rotational alignments were measured preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively on long-standing radiographs, on conventional coronal and sagittal views and on CT-scans of the knee. Length of skin incision, operating time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative ROM and HSS as well as KSS scores were determined. Postoperative mechanical axis improved significantly in both groups. Coronal and sagittal component positioning were accurate in both groups without significant differences. Rotational alignment showed the desired reproducible values without significant differences between the two groups. The posterior slope of the tibial component was significantly reconstructed to match the preoperative condition in both groups. The coronal alignment of the femoral and tibial components showed accurate reproducible results for implantation of both components in both groups. Length of skin incision was significantly shorter in the MIS CN-TKA. Duration of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the MIS CN-TKA group. Operating time and blood loss were similar in both groups. Postoperative ROM after the first 3 months was significantly higher in MIS CN-TKA, but after 6 months differences were minimal. Clinical outcome scores were identical for both groups 6 months after surgery. The advantages of CN-TKA are well known. Performing computer navigated TKA in combination with a minimally invasive approach in this study lead to a reduction of hospital stay and an initially increased ROM without differences in operating time and blood loss. Computer navigation in TKA preserves accurate coronal, sagittal and rotational components alignment even with a minimally invasive approach.
Alignment in total knee arthroplasty
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2004
Restoration of neutral alignment of the leg is an important factor affecting the long-term results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recent developments in computer-assisted surgery have focused on systems for improving TKA. In a prospective study two groups of 80 patients undergoing TKA had operations using either a computer-assisted navigation system or a conventional technique. Alignment of the leg and the orientation of components were determined on post-operative long-leg coronal and lateral films. The mechanical axis of the leg was significantly better in the computer-assisted group (96%, within ±3° varus/valgus) compared with the conventional group (78%, within ±3° varus/valgus). The coronal alignment of the femoral component was also more accurate in the computer-assisted group. Computer-assisted TKA gives a better correction of alignment of the leg and orientation of the components compared with the conventional technique. Potential benefits in the long-term outcome and fun...
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2016
Introduction This retrospective study examined the relationship between the mechanical axis throughout a functional arc of motion and functional outcome scores in patients undergoing computer-assisted navigation-based total knee arthroplasty (CAN-TKA) at 6-year follow-up. Materials and methods The Stryker eNact Precision Knee Navigation System was utilized to obtain pre-and postoperative alignment measurements throughout the functional arc of motion. Patients were contacted via telephone and asked to complete the Short Form-12 and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities, which have been demonstrated to be reliable, valid, and sensitive assessment tools in this patient population. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the correlation between arc alignment and patient-reported functional outcome measures. Results A total of 47 patients at a mean of 76.1 (±6.3)month follow-up and mean age of 65.9 (±7.9) years were surveyed. No correlation was found between the postoperative alignment or degree of intraoperative correction and the functional outcome scores. In a planned subgroup analysis of patients with a mean functional arc alignment greater than 3°from neutral, mean intraoperative degree of correction correlated with decreasing physical function (Spearman's q = 0.772, p = 0.04) and mean postoperative arc alignment positively correlated with increasing stiffness (q = 0.798, p = 0.03). Conclusion This study suggests that patients undergoing CAN-TKA with mean functional arc range of motion greater than 3°may be at increased risk for suboptimal patient-reported functional outcomes. This study also illustrates the ability of CAN-TKA to measure the varus or valgus alignment of the knee throughout the entire range of motion.
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2009
This is a randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the alignment, function, and patient quality-of-life outcomes between patients undergoing conventional (CONV) and computer-assisted (CAS) knee arthroplasty. One hundred and fifteen patients (60 CAS, 55 CONV) underwent cemented total knee arthroplasty. Three patients were lost to follow-up. Eighty-eight percent (CAS) vs 61% (CONV) of knees achieved a mechanical axis within 3°of neutral (P = .003). Aligning femoral rotation with the epicondylar axis was accurately achieved in CAS and CONV with no significant difference. Patients with coronal alignment within 3°of neutral had superior International Knee Society and Short-Form 12 physical scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty achieves greater accuracy in implant alignment and this correlates with better knee function and improved quality of life. Key words: computer-assisted surgery, function, patient quality of life, alignment.
Bone Joint J , 2016
Aims We conducted a randomised controlled trial to assess the accuracy of positioning and alignment of the components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), comparing those undertaken using standard intramedullary cutting jigs and those with patient-specific instruments (PSI). Patients and Methods There were 64 TKAs in the standard group and 69 in the PSI group. The post-operative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and positioning was investigated using CT scans. Deviation of > 3° from the planned position was regarded as an outlier. The operating time, Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) scores were recorded. Results There were 14 HKA-angle outliers (22%) in the standard group and nine (13%) in the PSI group (p = 0.251). The mean HKA-angle was 0.5° varus in the standard group and 0.2° varus in the PSI group (p = 0.492). The accuracy of alignment in the coronal and axial planes and the proportion of outliers was not different in the two groups. The femoral component was more flexed (p = 0.035) and there were significantly more tibial slope outliers (29% versus 13%) in the PSI group (p = 0.032). Operating time and the median three-month OKS were similar (p = 0.218 and p = 0.472, respectively). Physical and mental SF-12 scores were not significantly different at three months (p = 0.418 and p = 0.267, respectively) or at one year post-operatively (p = 0.114 and p = 0.569). The median one-year Oxford knee score was two points higher in the PSI group (p = 0.049). Conclusion Compared with standard intramedullary jigs, the use of PSI did not significantly reduce the number of outliers or the mean operating time, nor did it clinically improve the accuracy of alignment or the median Oxford Knee Scores. Our data do not support the routine use of PSI when undertaking TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1043–9. Between 6% and 12% of total knee arthro-plasties (TKAs) fail as a result of malposition and malalignment of the components. 1,2 Mal-alignment also contributes to instability, asep-tic loosening and unexplained pain. 3-5 Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced to improve the positioning of components. Other postulated benefits are increased surgical efficiency and a potential reduction of complications due to avoidance of medullary canal violation and reduced operating time. Comparative trials involving the use of PSI which used plain radiographs to assess the mechanical axis and alignment of the components have produced variable results. 6-9 Three studies used CT scans to analyse the positioning of the components. Woolson et al 10 did not show any improvement of alignment in their underpowered study. The tibial slope in the PSI group had more outliers. An outlier is most often defined as deviation by > 3° from the planned alignment. Ng et al 11 showed more accurate tibial coronal and both femoral and tibial rotational alignment in their PSI group. Due to randomisation by the choice of the patient this study had a high risk of selection bias. Roh et al 12 showed no difference in accuracy or outliers between standard and PSI instrumentation. The loss to follow-up in the PSI group was > 15% and a per-protocol analysis was described. There was thus a high risk of attrition bias. Furthermore, their CT analysis program is primarily used in maxillofacial surgery and dentistry, and has not been validated for use in orthopaedic surgery. 12
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume, 2013
Introduction From pre-operative planning to final implant cementation, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be defined by a succession of individual steps, each presenting potential errors that can result in devices being implanted outside the desired range of alignment. Our study used an image-free computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) guidance system (Exactech GPS, Blue-Ortho, Grenoble, FR) to evaluate alignment discrepancies occurring during different steps of a typical TKA procedure. Materials and methods: A surgical profile was established to define resection parameters and steps for proximal tibial and distal femoral cuts (see Figure 1A) to be made on seven synthetic knee models (MITA, Medical Models, Bristol, UK). First, the guidance system was used to acquire pre-identified landmarks. Next, a cutting block was adjusted to match the resection targets and then fixed to the bone using locking pins. Bone cuts were performed and then checked. Data was collected from the guidan...
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2013
Background: Incorrect positioning of the implant and improper alignment of the limb following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to rapid implant wear, loosening, and suboptimal function. Studies suggest that alignment errors of > 3° are associated with rapid failure and less satisfactory function. Computer navigated systems have been developed to enhance precision in instrumentation during surgery. The aim of the study was to compare component alignment following computer assisted surgery (CAS) and jig based TKA as well as functional outcome. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study of 100 knees to compare computer-assisted TKA and jig-based surgery in relation to femoral and tibial component alignment and functional outcome. The postoperative x-rays (anteroposterior and lateral) of the knee and CT scanogram from hip to foot were obtained. The coronal alignment of the femoral and tibial components and rotational alignment of femoral component was calculated. Knee society score at 24 months was used to assess the function. Results: Results of our study show that mean placement of the tibial component in coronal plane (91.3037°) and sagittal planes (3.6058°) was significantly better with CAS. The difference was statistically insignificant in case of mean coronal alignment of the femoral components (90.34210° in navigation group and 90.5444° in jig group) and in case of the mean femoral condylar twist angle (external rotation 2.3406° in navigation group versus 2.3593° in jig group). Conclusions: A significantly improved placement of the component was found in the coronal and sagittal planes of the tibial component by CAS. The placement of the components in the other planes was comparable with the values recorded in the jig-based surgery group. Functional outcome was not significantly different.