MISSED OPPORTUNITIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN THE ARAB MIDDLE EAST: PATIENTS AND PHYSICIANS IMPEDIMENTS (original) (raw)
Related papers
Clinical …, 2010
Background: Lack of timely reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been associated with worse outcomes. The aim of this study is to identify the frequency and predictors of delayed presentation and missed reperfusion in patients with STEMI in the Gulf Register of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE) registry. Delayed Presentation and missed reperfusion is associated with increased in hospital mortality in STEMI patients. Methods: Gulf RACE is a prospective, multinational study of all consecutive patients hospitalized with the final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in 65 centers in 6 Arab countries. In this analysis, we included 3197 patients with STEMI. The independent predictors of delayed presentation and missed reperfusion therapy were identified using multivariate logistic regression. Results: In total, 929 patients presented >12 hours after symptom onset. The independent predictors of late presentation are older age, atypical symptoms, no family history of coronary artery disease, and being in Yemen. Of the 2268 STEMI patients presenting early, a total of 205 patients (9.3%) did not receive reperfusion therapy despite no contraindications (shortfall). The independent predictors of not receiving appropriate reperfusion therapy are older age, prior stroke, being in Yemen, and atypical symptoms. Lack of reperfusion therapy due to shortfall or delayed presentation was associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: Nearly one-third of patients with STEMI in the Arab Middle East present to the hospital >12 hours after symptom onset, and nearly 1 in 10 eligible patients do not receive any reperfusion therapy. Community and physician awareness programs are needed to increase the utilization of appropriate lifesaving therapies.
The Egyptian Heart Journal, 2020
Background: Apart from few small single-center studies, there are limited data about STEMI patients in Egypt. Nineteen Egyptian centers (with and without PCI facilities) participated in this registry with 1356 patients who were compared to 7420 patients from other ESC countries. The aims of this study were to describe the characteristics of patients with STEMI, to assess STEMI management patterns particularly the current use of reperfusion therapies, to evaluate the organization of STEMI networks across Egypt, to evaluate in-hospital patient outcome, and to compare Egyptian patients with other ESC countries.
Organisation of reperfusion therapy for STEMI in a developing country
Open Heart, 2015
Objective: Routine evaluation of performance measures for the system of care for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is needed to improve the STEMI network. We sought to evaluate the current status of reperfusion therapy for STEMI in the capital city of a developing country where a STEMI network was introduced in 2010. Methods: Data were obtained from a local registry. A total of 28 812 patients admitted to the emergency department of a national cardiovascular hospital in three different periods (2007, 2010 and 2013) were retrospectively analysed; there were 2703 patients with STEMI. Results: In 2013 compared with 2007, there was a major increase in the number of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) (35% vs 24%, p<0.001), and the proportion of non-reperfused patients fell (62.8% vs 67.7%, p<0.001). An improvement in the overall STEMI mortality rate was also observed (7.5% vs 11.7%, p<0.001). Conclusions: Implementation of a regional system of care for STEMI may improve utilisation of primary PCI. Future organisation of reperfusion therapy in a developing country such as Indonesia strongly calls for a strategy that focuses on prehospital care to minimise delay from the first medical contact to reperfusion therapy, and this may reduce the proportion of nonreperfused patients. These strategies are in concordance with guideline recommendations and may reduce or eliminate gaps in healthcare in developing countries, particularly the underutilisation of evidence-based therapies for patients with STEMI.
BMJ Open, 2016
We studied the characteristics of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after expansion of a STEMI registry as part of the STEMI network programme in a metropolitan city and the surrounding area covering ∼26 million inhabitants. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Emergency department of 56 health centres. Participants: 3015 patients with acute coronary syndrome, of which 1024 patients had STEMI. Main outcome measure: Characteristics of reperfusion therapy. Results: The majority of patients with STEMI (81%; N=826) were admitted to six academic percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centres. PCI centres received patients predominantly (56%; N=514) from a transfer process. The proportion of patients receiving acute reperfusion therapy was higher than nonreperfused patients (54% vs 46%, p<0.001), and primary PCI was the most common method of reperfusion (86%). The mean door-to-device (DTD) time was 102±68 min. In-hospital mortality of nonreperfused patients was higher than patients receiving primary PCI or fibrinolytic therapy (9.1% vs 3.2% vs 3.8%, p<0.001). Compared with non-academic PCI centres, patients with STEMI admitted to academic PCI centres who underwent primary PCI had shorter mean DTD time (96±44 min vs 140±151 min, p<0.001), higher use of manual thrombectomy (60.2% vs13.8%, p<0.001) and drug-eluting stent implantation (87% vs
The Egyptian Heart Journal, 2023
Background For patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), early reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or thrombolytic treatment is essential to prevent major adverse cardiac events. The aim of the study is to compare the current status of managing STEMI patients at **** with European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommendations. Prospective cohort of all patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) between March 2020 and February 2021 in Alexandria University hospitals. Reporting patterns, causes of delay, and reperfusion status for all STEMI patients were noted. MACE: (Mortality, Re-infarction, Stroke, or Heart failure) was reported and compared among different management strategies. Results The study was conducted over one year on 436 patients, 280 (64.2%) of them underwent PPCI, 32 (7.3%) received thrombolysis, and 124 (28.5%) had a conservative strategy. Patients' mean age was 55.2 years, 72.2% were smokers and 80.9% were men. Family history was positive in 14.2% of patients, 33.5% had diabetes, 7.3% had renal impairment, and 41.5% had hypertension. The median pre-hospital waiting time was 360 min; the mean pre-hospital waiting time was 629.0 ± 796.7 min. The median Emergency Room waiting time was 48.24 ± 89.30 min. The median time from CCU admission to wire crossing was 40.0 min with a mean value 53.86 ± 49.0 min. The mean ischemia duration was 408 min, while the total ischemic time was 372 min. All patients who presented within 12 h received reperfusion therapy either a PPCI or thrombolysis at a rate of 71.5%, with 35.0% of those patients achieving prompt reperfusion in accordance with ESC guidelines. The PPCI group mortality rate was 2.9%, in comparison to 12.9% in the conservative group, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Overall in-hospital mortality was 5.5%, and total MACE was 27.3%. A statistically significant difference was observed between the three management groups as regards MACE rate, being 15%, 28.1%, and 54.8% in PPCI, thrombolysis, and conservative groups, respectively. Conclusions Despite financial and technical constraints, appropriate, timely reperfusion was near to achieving the ESC guidelines for the management of STEMI. The most common reperfusion strategy was PPCI, with an in-hospital death rate of less than 5% in the PPCI group. There was a concern about the increase in the total ischemia time due to some financial and technical constraints.
S. Wahler, M. Sokolov, V. Agladze, H. Pereira, M. Studencan, Z. Kaifoszova, Manel Sabaté, F. Weidinger, J. Kanakakis, O. Goktekin, M. Noc, Miodrag Ostojic, D. Deleanu, L. Aaberge
European Heart Journal, 2014
Patient access to reperfusion therapy and the use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) or thrombolysis (TL) varies considerably between European countries. The aim of this study was to obtain a realistic contemporary picture of how patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are treated in different European countries.
European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2016
Emergency medical services play a key role in the recognition and treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study evaluates the effect of emergency medical services use on adherence to reperfusion therapy guidelines in Belgian STEMI patients and on in-hospital mortality. The mode of admission with against without emergency medical services was associated with baseline risk profile, reperfusion modalities and in-hospital mortality in 5692 consecutive STEMI patients from 2012 to 2014. A total of 3896 STEMI patients (68%) were transported to the hospital by emergency medical services, and 1796 patients (32%) arrived at the hospital using their own transport (self-referral). Emergency medical services patients were older than self-referral patients (64 vs. 62 years) and more frequently presented with cardiac arrest (14% vs. 5%) and with cardiogenic shock (10% vs. 4%). Emergency medical services patients received primary percutaneous coronary intervention more...
Heart Science Journal, 2022
Background : Achieving timely reperfusion for patients with ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) remains a challenging problem in developing countries. This study aimed to determine whether late PPCI is the main predictor for in-hospital adverse events in STEMI patients. Method : This study will emphasize the incident of in-hospital adverse events and complications between early PPCI vs late PPCI vs non revascularization groups. A total of 568 STEMI patients were consecutively enrolled from Saiful Anwar General Hospital in between 2018-2021. Patients were subdivided to the timeframe provided by the 2017 ESC STEMI management guideline. The incidence of in-hospital adverse event were calculated as primary endpoints, development of immediate complications during hospitalizations were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Results : Incidence of in-hospital mortality were significantly higher for patients treated without revascularization and lowest in early PPCI group (32.4% and 7.5% respectively, P 0.00). The odds ratio for mortality between early PPCI group and non-revascularization groups were significantly lowest (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.13-0.41). Complications between each treatment groups were significantly different with early PPCI had the lowest incidence of in-hospital complications of cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and VT/VF. Stratification of baseline characteristics and PCI category reveals that timing PPCI is the main predictor for in-hospital adverse events (HR 4.506, 95% CI 2.487-6.662, P 0.00). Conclusion : Percutaneous coronary intervention is the main predictor for the incidence of in hospital mortality and complications in STEMI patients.
The American Journal of Cardiology, 2011
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves 12-month survival in late presenters with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We analyzed 2,036 patients with STEMI presenting 12 to 24 hours from onset of symptoms, without cardiogenic shock or pulmonary edema and not reperfused by thrombolysis, of 23,517 patients with STEMI enrolled in the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes from June 2005 to August 2006. An invasive approach was chosen in 910 (44.7%) of late presenters and 92% of them underwent reperfusion by PCI. Patients with an invasive approach had lower mortality after 12 months than patients with a conservative approach (9.3% vs 17.9%, p <0.0001). The benefit of an invasive approach was also observed after multivariate adjustment with a relative risk 0.73 for 12-month mortality (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.96) and in a subpopulation of patients selected by a propensity-score matching procedure with an adjusted relative risk 0.73 for 12-month mortality (0.58 to 0.99). In conclusion, almost 1/2 of late presenters with STEMI were considered eligible for reperfusion by primary PCI. These patients had a lower 12-month mortality rate than they would have had if they had been treated conservatively, which supports the idea of late reperfusion in STEMI. However, whether all late presenters with STEMI should be treated invasively remains unanswered. Nevertheless, until a randomized trial is undertaken, late presenters with STEMI could be considered for reperfusion by primary PCI.
Not All STEMI Patients Receive Timely Reperfusion: Considerations for Rural Emergency Departments
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Early reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is well known to improve patient outcomes. A review of patient records in one rural health service in New South Wales, Australia, suggested that not all STEMI patients were receiving timely reperfusion. Consequently, the aim of this study was to further investigate factors influencing clinical decision making by primary care providers in relation to rural STEMI patients. This cross-sectional observational study was in two phases, a retrospective audit of patient records and a survey of rural general practitioners (GPs). In the first phase, patients with STEMI who were referred from small rural hospitals to a regional hospital emergency department (ED) were identified through the local health district database. In phase two, information from the database informed questions for a survey distributed to the GP visiting medical officers (VMOs) at small rural hospitals in the region. The survey was designed to ascertain factors that may contribute to delays in the care of STEMI patients. Of the STEMI patients identified (n = 139), 15% (21) who were eligible for medical reperfusion were not administered thrombolysis within 4 hours of triage. Auditing of this group's records found that ECGs were inaccurately interpreted for 76% of the missed STEMI patients. In the survey, about 55% of the GP respondents said they "very much agree" with the statement that they felt competent in STEMI management. Only 64% of the GP VMOs agreed they felt competent in diagnosis and management of a failed thrombolysis and not all respondents were aware of the relevant clinical guideline. Patients with missed STEMI are at higher risk of morbidity and mortality and increased length of stay, adding burden to the patient, carer and health service. Without addressing gaps in service provision and better adherence to clinical guidelines, unacceptable delays in STEMI management in rural health services are likely to continue.