Top down processing of faces in human brain: a behavioral study (original) (raw)

Abstract

Notwithstanding the extensive research effort has gone into understanding face perception by human brain. The concept of face recognition is established yet is selectively impaired relative to recognition of faces of equivalent difficulty. The objective of present study is to develop a theoretical model and a set of stipulations for understanding and discussing how we distinguish familiar faces, and the relationship between recognition and other aspects of face processing. Top down imagery stimuli of familiar and unfamiliar faces were shown to healthy individuals and were asked to recognize them as quickly and accurately as possible. The stimuli were formulated in such a manner that semantic memory and cognitive training does not play a significant role during the task execution. The responded stages by the subjects were recorded. Results obtained from the nonparametric analysis of the multivariate data recorded indicate that process of structural decoding of unfamiliar faces occurring inside the brain is delayed in comparison to familiar faces. It is speculated that brain structures, which have been associated with face recognition task countenance difficulty while identifying unfamiliar faces. Several distinctive information that we derive from seen faces appear to influence the processing performance of the brain during the task.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (24)

  1. G. M. Davies, H. D. Ellis, J. W. Shepherd, "Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation," Journal of Applied Psychology 63. pp. 180-187, 1978.
  2. I. Biederman, P. Kalocsai, "Neural and psychological analysis of object and face recognition," Face recognition: From theory to applications (H. Wechsler, P. J. Phillips, V. Bruce, F. F. Soulie, T. S. Huang, eds.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp.3-25, 1998.
  3. H. D. Ellis, "Introduction to aspects of face processing: Ten questions in need of answers," Aspects of Face Processing (H. Ellis, M. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, A. Young, eds.), Dordrecht: Nijhoff, pp.3-13, 1986.
  4. N. Kanwisher, J. McDemott, M. M. Chun, "The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastritate cortex specialized for face perception," Journal of Neuroscience17, pp.4302-11, 1997.
  5. G. McCarthy, A. Puce, J. C. Gore, T. Allison, "Face specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus," Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17, pp.605-10.
  6. R. J. Itier, M. J. Taylor, "Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs," Neuroimage, pp.1518-1532, 2004.
  7. R. J. Itier, M. J. Taylor, "Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects," Neuroreport 15, pp.1261-1265, 2004.
  8. S. Watanabe, R. Kakigi, S. Koyama, E. Kirino, "Human face perception traced by magneto-and electro-encephalography," Cognitive Brain Research 8, Elsevier, pp.125-142, 1999.
  9. S. Watanabe, R. Kakigi, S. Koyama, E. Kirino, "It takes longer to recognize the eyes than the whole face in humans," Neuroreport 10, pp.2193-2198, 1999.
  10. M. J. Farah, K. L. Klein, K. Levinson, "Face recognition and within- category discrimination in prosopagnosia," Neuropsychologia, Elsevier, 2000.
  11. K. Werheid, G. Alpay, I. Jentzsch, W. Sommer, "Priming emotional facial expressions as evidenced by event-related brain potentials," International Journal of Psychophysiology. Elsevier, pp. 209-219, 2005.
  12. M. Eimer, "Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition," Clinical Neurophysiology, Volume 111, Issue 4, pp. 694-705, 2000.
  13. P. Sinha, B. Balas, Y. Ostrovsky, R. Russell, "Face recognition by humans: 20 results all computer vision researchers should know about," Proceedings of the IEEE, 2006.
  14. S. Duvdevani-Bar, S. Edelman, "Visual recognition and categorization on the basis of similarities to multiple class prototypes," International Journal of Computer Vision 33(3), pp.201-228, 1999.
  15. J. Lambers, Math 105A Summer Session I Lecture 10 Notes, 2003-04.
  16. M. P. Wand, M. C. Jones, Kernel Smoothing, Chapman & Hall/CRC press, 1995.
  17. J. Ćwik, J. Koronacki, "Multivariate Density Estimation: A Comparative Study," Neural Computing and Applications. Springer- Verlag London Limited, pp.173-185, 1997.
  18. T. Duong, "ks: Kernel Density Estimation and Kernel Discriminant Analysis for Multivariate Data in R," Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 21, 2007.
  19. J. Fan, Q. Yao, Nonlinear time series: Nonparametric and Parametric methods, "Nonparametric density estimation," Springer, 2005.
  20. V. P. J. B. Hancock, A. M. Burton, "Human face perception and identification," Face recognition: From Theory to Applications (H. Wechsler, P. J. Phillips, V. Bruce, F. F. Soulie, T. S. Huang, eds.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp.3-25, 1999.
  21. J. N. Tanaka, M. J. Farah, K. D. Wilson, M. Drain, "What is "special" about face perception?," Phychological Review Vol. 105, No. 3. American Psycological Association Inc., pp.482-498, 1998.
  22. A. J. O'Toole, "Handbook on face recognition," Psychological and Neural Perspectives on Human Face Recognition," Springer, 2004.
  23. L. D. Harmon, "The recognition of Faces," Scientific American, vol.229, no. 5, pp. 71-82, 1973.
  24. A. P. Ginsburg, "Visual information processing based on spatial filters constrained by biological data," AMRL Technical Report, pp. 78-129, 1978.