Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation: a utilization review of use in a teaching hospital (original) (raw)
Related papers
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the acute care setting: where are we?
European Respiratory Journal - EUR RESP J, 2008
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is a technique used to deliver mechanical ventilation that is increasingly utilised in acute and chronic conditions. The present review examines the evidence supporting the use of NPPV in acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to different conditions. Strong evidence supports the use of NPPV for ARF to prevent endotracheal intubation (ETI), as well as to facilitate extubation in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and to avoid ETI in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, and in immunocompromised patients. Weaker evidence supports the use of NPPV for patients with ARF due to asthma exacerbations, with post-operative or post-extubation ARF, pneumonia, acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or during bronchoscopy. NPPV should be applied under close clinical and physiological monitoring for signs of treatment failure and, in such cases, ETI should be promptly available. A trained team, ca...
The clinical respiratory journal, 2015
Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) is employed for the management of acute respiratory failure and studies have shown that it can prevent the need for endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation and associated complications. Given limited studies evaluating the factors, other than those related patient or underlying disease severity, that may lead to NIPPV failure, we performed this study to gain insight into current practices in terms of utilization of NIPPV and operator dependent factors that may possibly contribute to failure of NIPPV. After institutional board review approval a retrospective chart review was performed of consecutive patients who were initiated on and failed NIPPV between January 2009 and December 2009. Data was recorded regarding baseline demographics, admission diagnosis, indications for NIPPV, presence of contraindications, type of NIPPV and initial settings, ABG analysis before and after initiation, whether a titration of the settings was ...
Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Utilization In Children With Respiratory Failure
American Journal of …, 2010
The use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) has become more widespread over the past decade, but its prescription, use and outcomes in the clinical setting remain uncertain. The objective of this study was to review the use of NIPPV for ARF with respect to clinical indications, physician ordering, monitoring strategies and patient outcomes. Methods: A total of 91 consecutive adult patients admitted between June 1997 and September 1998 to a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital in Hamilton, Ont., who received 95 trials of NIPPV for ARF were included in an observational cohort study. Data abstraction forms were completed in duplicate, then relevant clinical, physiologic, prescribing, monitoring and outcome data were abstracted from the NIPPV registry and hospital records. Results: The most common indications for NIPPV were pulmonary edema (42 of 95 trials [44.2%]) and exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (23 of 95 trials [24.2%]). NIPPV was started primarily in the emergency department (62.1% of trials), however, in terms of total hours of NIPPV the most frequent sites of administration were the intensive care unit (30.9% of total hours) and the clinical teaching unit (20.2% of total hours). NIPPV was stopped in 48.4% of patients because of improvement and in 25.6% because of deterioration necessitating endotracheal intubation. The median time to intubation was 3.0 hours (interquartile range 0.8-12.2 hours). The respirology service was consulted for 28.4% of the patients. Physician orders usually lacked details of NIPPV settings and monitoring methods. We found no significant predictors of the need for endotracheal intubation. The overall death rate was 28.6%. The only independent predictor of death was a decreased level of consciousness (odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.0-8.4). Interpretation: NIPPV was used for ARF of diverse causes in many hospital settings and was started and managed by physicians with various levels of training and experience. The use of this technique outside the critical care setting may be optimized by a multidisciplinary educational practice guideline.
Critical Care Medicine, 1999
While non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has become an accepted management approach for patients with acute hypercapnia, it remains unclear whether it can also be beneficial in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with chronic respiratory failure. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) with a maximum duration of 3 months showed contradictory effects in blood gasses, dyspnoea, sleep efficiency and health-related quality of life. On the other hand, several uncontrolled trials did show positive results in patients with hypercapnia. Recently, an RCT compared the combination of NIPPV and long-term oxygen treatment (LTOT) with LTOT alone for a period of 2 years in hypercapnic patients. After this period dyspnoea decreased and health-related quality of life improved in the NIPPV compared to the LTOT group. Reasons for the contradictory results in the different trials are probably patient selection, adequacy of ventilation, and length of ventilation. Therefore, at this moment there is no conclusive evidence that NIPPV should be provided routinely to stable patients with COPD. However, a selected group of patients might have clinical benefits from it. Patients who are clearly hypercapnic, who can tolerate an effective level of ventilatory support, and who get enough time to adjust to the ventilator might show clinical benefits even after 3 months. A trial with ventilatory support in this group of patients can be considered.
Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences, 2023
Abstract Background: Failure of respiratory system in one or both of its gas-exchanging functions- oxygenation of pulmonary arterial blood and carbon-dioxide elimination from mixed venous blood. Non-Invasive Ventilation is an alternative to invasive ventilation in many conditions it is a valuable component in patient management. Its use in acute respiratory failure is widely accepted and well known. Aim: To Study the indications, outcomes, and complications of NIV. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective observational study conducted on 100 patients admitted with either Type-I or Type -II respiratory failure. Results: Various common indications for use of NIV in acute Respiratory Failure are COPD, ILD, Bronchiectasis, Pneumonia, Pulmonary Thromboembolism, Kyphoscoliosis, and Pulmonary Tuberculosis in that order. The overall success rate of NIV is 84%. Conclusion: NIV helps in improving gas exchange in acute respiratory failure irrespective of its type, reduces intubation and length of hospital stay hence, its use as the first modality of treatment in patients without overt contraindications is recommended. Overall, NIV is safe and effective in patients with acute respiratory failure as there are no major complications associated with its use. Keywords: Respiratory failure, Complications, NonÂInvasive Ventilation
Critical care (London, England), 2000
Our current state of knowledge on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) and technical aspects are discussed in the present review. In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, NPPV can be considered a valid therapeutic option to prevent endotracheal intubation. Evidence suggests that, before eventual endotracheal intubation, NPPV should be considered as first-line intervention in the early phases of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Small randomized and non-randomized studies on the application of NPPV in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure showed promising results, with reduction in complications such as sinusitis and ventilator-associated pneumonia, and in the duration of intensive care unit stay. The conventional use of NPPV in hypoxaemic acute respiratory failure still remains controversial, however. Large randomized studies are still needed before extensive clinical application in this condition.
Respiratory medicine, 2009
Trial of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in the emergency department (ED) for heterogeneous acute respiratory failure (ARF) has been optional and its clinical benefit unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing between two periods, October 2001-September 2003 and October 2004-September 2006, i.e., before and after adopting an NIV-trial strategy in which NIV was applied in the ED to any noncontraindicated ARF patients needing ventilatory support and was then continued in the intermediate-care-unit. During these two periods, we retrieved cases of ARF treated either invasively or with NIV, and compared the patients' in-hospital mortalities and the length of ICU and intermediate-care-unit stay. Compared were 73 (invasive 56, NIV 17) and 125 cases (invasive 31, NIV 94) retrieved from 271 and 415 emergent admissions with proper pulmonary etiologies for mechanical ventilation, respectively. Of their respiratory failures, type (hypercapnic/non-hypercapnic, 0.97 vs. 0.98) ...
Canadian Respiratory Journal, 2015
I n the past two decades, there has been increased interest in the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) as a treatment for acute respiratory failure (1-3). NIV can provide ventilatory support with similar physiological benefits as invasive mechanical ventilation, including reduced work of breathing and improved gas exchange (4). NIV has advantages including the need for less sedation, reduced risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia, and shorter durations of ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (5). Consequently, the use of NIV has increased internationally (6) within ICUs, emergency departments (EDs) (7,8) and postanesthetic care units (9), as well as medical wards and palliative care units (10,11). However, the frequency of NIV use varies among sites and countries (1,2,12-17), and may be underutilized in some diagnoses (18). The quality of evidence supporting the use of NIV in various etiologies of acute respiratory failure varies. A recent Canadian clinical practice guideline (19) highlighted the varying strength of evidence to GC Digby, SP Keenan, CM Parker, et al. Noninvasive ventilation practice patterns for acute respiratory failure in Canadian tertiary care centres: A descriptive analysis.