Why Wait? Early Determinants of School Dropout in Preventive Pediatric Primary Care (original) (raw)
Related papers
BMC Public Health, 2012
School dropout is a persisting problem with major socioeconomic consequences. Although poor health probably contributes to pathways leading to school dropout and health is likely negatively affected by dropout, these issues are relatively absent on the public health agenda. This emphasises the importance of integrative research aimed at identifying children at risk for school dropout at an early stage, discovering how socioeconomic status and gender affect health-related pathways that lead to dropout and developing a prevention tool that can be used in public health services for youth.
Journal of School Psychology, 2000
Prior studies report a variety of demographic, school, individual, and family characteristics that are related to high school drop out. This study utilizes data from a 19-year prospective longitudinal study of “at-risk” children to explore multiple predictors of high school dropouts across development. The proposed model of dropping out emphasizes the importance of the early home environment and the quality of early caregiving influencing subsequent development. The results of this study demonstrate the association of the early home environment, the quality of early caregiving, socioeconomic status, IQ, behavior problems, academic achievement, peer relations, and parent involvement with dropping out of high school at age 19. These results are consistent with the view of dropping out as a dynamic developmental process that begins before children enter elementary school. Psychosocial variables prior to school entry predicted dropping out with power equal to later IQ and school achievement test scores. In our efforts to better understand processes influencing dropping out prior to high school graduation, early developmental features warrant further emphasis.
Predicting different types of school dropouts: A typological approach with two longitudinal samples
Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000
Despite evidence of the psychosocial heterogeneity of school dropouts, empirical studies have rarely directly addressed this issue. The general goal of this research was to explore the heuristic value of a typological approach for preventing and studying school dropout. The specific objectives were to build empirically a typology of dropouts based on individual school experience, to test the typology's reliability by replicating the classification with two different longitudinal samples, and to examine the typology's predictive and discriminant validity. The results led to a 4-type solution: Quiet, Disengaged, Low-Achiever, and Maladjusted dropouts. The results support the internal and external validity of the typology and highlight important different profiles with regard to personal and social risk factors. The discussion underscores the theoretical and clinical utility of a typological approach by assisting the study of the different paths in the etiology of school dropout and the adoption of a differential prevention strategy.
European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2012
Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media BV. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to selfarchive your work, please use the accepted author's version for posting to your own website or your institution's repository. You may further deposit the accepted author's version on a funder's repository at a funder's request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 months after publication. A multidimensional model of school dropout from an 8-year longitudinal study in a general high school population
Factors influencing school dropouts at the primary level
The study investigates the factors influencing the school dropouts at the primary level in Jorhat district of Assam, India based on the responses of 120 dropouts selected through random sampling. The major factors influencing school dropouts were found to be household work, lack of parental guidance in studies, large family size, poor economic condition of the family, failure in examination, lack of time for study, punishment by teachers, lack of interest in studies, etc.
BMC Public Health, 2011
Background: In Luxembourg, the extensive phenomenon of school dropout is a prime policy concern in the light of individual, social and economic consequences. Although the authorities report an overall decrease of the national dropout rate, the proportion of early school leavers who remain without any specific occupation is still alarming. Therefore, this study intends a shift of focus from system-inherent to individual factors, including mental health and family correlates, to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the dropout phenomenon. Methods/Design: The objectives of this study are to investigate the type and prevalence of psychiatric disorders among school dropouts and to compare the findings with those by a matched control group of regularly enrolled students. Furthermore, family variables and socioeconomic status will be analysed, as they are factors likely to interfere with both educational attainment and mental health. A trained psychologist will use structured interviews and self-report forms to investigate for mental health issues, information on schooling, socioeconomic situation and family life. Controls will be matched for gender, age, school type and educational grade. Discussion: As school dropouts face a serious risk of long term professional and social marginalization, there is an evident need for action. Identifying psychosocial risk and protective factors of school dropout will deliver solid insight on how to conceive public health strategies for young people who may need a more customized support to carry out their academic potential.
A critical review of the literature on school dropout
Educational Research Review, 2013
This paper reviews the growing literature on early school leaving. We clarify what is at stake with early school leaving, and touch upon underlying problems and methodological issues raised in the literature. The paper investigates the levels, the methods and models with which the topic has been studied, and discusses potential (dis)advantages of each of those.