Fisheries Governance (original) (raw)
Related papers
Fishing Livelihoods and Fisheries Governance
Asia-Pacific Fishing Livelihoods, 2021
This book centres on an understanding of fishing livelihoods within processes of historical change, and the social and political relationships within which they are embedded. Drawing on our research experience from the Asia-Pacific region, we examine where fishing livelihoods have come from, and where they are going. This introductory chapter introduces fishing livelihoods and the governance challenge that they face, before examining social science research in greater depth. We then develop the idea of a relational approach to fishing livelihoods, describing how they are shaped by wider political and economic trajectories, by local social relationships and by institutional structures.
Governance and institutional changes in fisheries: issues and priorities for research
… Center Discussion Series, 2006
Time, therefore, is ripe to learn about the multitude and direction of the institutional changes over the last two or three decades, and their relevance and impacts on poverty reduction in developing countries. A two-day consultation meeting was held in Dhaka, Bangladesh during 6-7 October 2004. The objectives of the meeting were: 1) to review and assess the institutional changes in fisheries institutions and governance, and their relevance and impact on poverty elimination and environmental protection in developing countries; and 2) to develop a framework for an in-depth study on national policy and legislative changes and the impact on livelihoods and poverty reduction strategy as well as sustainable management of the aquatic environment. The editors are grateful to the authors and participants (listed in Appendix 2) from international and regional organizations, and selected fishing countries (where poverty reduction is one of the MDGs) for providing valuable input in producing and finalizing this discussion paper.
Governance interactions in small‐scale fisheries market chains: Examples from the Asia‐Pacific
Fish and Fisheries, 2019
Small‐scale fisheries are subject to various governing institutions operating at different levels with different objectives. At the same time, small‐scale fisheries increasingly form part of domestic and international market chains, with consequent effects for marine environments and livelihoods of the fishery‐dependent. Yet there remains a need to better understand how small‐scale fisheries market chains interact with the range of governance institutions that influence them. In this paper, we examine how multiple governance systems function along market chains, in order to identify opportunities for improved multiscale governance. We use three small‐scale fisheries with varying local to global market chains operating in the Asia‐Pacific region to develop a framework for analysis. Drawing from Interactive Governance theory we identify governing systems that have come to operate at particular sections in each market chain. We recognize four institutions that shape the governance over...
Enhancing governance in fisheries management in southeast Asia towards 2020: issues and perspectives
2011
Ladies and Gentlemen, let me at the start thank SEAFDEC, ASEAN and the organizing committee of this conference for inviting me to present some thoughts on this important issue of enhancing governance in fisheries management in Southeast Asia. ASEAN and SEAFDEC have been paving the way for enhancing better governance of the region's fisheries within the context of an ecosystems approach and have articulated the approach through the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (CCRF) adopted in 1995 and in their regionalized CCRF incorporating internationally accepted set of principles and guidelines for governance and best practices in fisheries development and management. ASEAN and SEAFDEC have also been responding to the other international instruments such as the International Plan of Action (IPOAs) on management of fishing capacity, conservation and management of sharks, reducing the incidental catch of seabirds, and illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, all of which are aimed at enhancing governance in fisheries management (Mahyam et al., 2011).
Governance and Governability: The Small- Scale Purse Seine Fishery in Pulau Rote, Eastern Indonesia
2015
Rote is Indonesia’s southern-most island with a population of approximately 128,000 people. Largely unregulated small-scale fisheries are integral to local livelihood strategies. Local catches are highly diverse, which reflects regional biodiversity and mixed fishing strategies. Rote’s four mile coastal marine zone open to local small scale fisheries is porous, resulting in competition against fishers from outside the district. Beyond these four miles local fishers compete against large- scale fishing operations for declining resources. To maintain fisheries sustainability and improve fishing-dependant livelihoods, improved governance is needed. Aligning with the interactive governance framework, this chapter examines a small- scale purse seine fishery operating around Rote waters, looking in particular at the implications of governance change through a coherent, carefully prioritized, reform scheme of investment and management. We argue that the major challenges to effective governance frameworks for small-scale fisheries in Rote include: (i) poor information fl ow that impedes new discourses on the comparative advantages of alternative arrangements leaving governing bodies consistently confronted by wicked problems; (ii) local attitudes towards compliance with fisheries laws and a limited capacity for enforcement; and (iii) a hierarchical governance system characterized by insecure tenure and competing governance priorities. We also present and argue for some likely pathways to improved governance.
Marine Policy, 2013
Over the past fifteen years a number of transnational certification and labeling schemes have emerged with the aim to foster sustainable fisheries and aquaculture practices worldwide. Despite notable successes in the uptake and implementation of these standards, few measurable environmental improvements have been achieved on a global scale to date. This paper explores the conditions for effective governance taking into account external and internal attributes of the relevant rule-setting organizations. The analysis provided in this paper is situated in a broader debate regarding the effectiveness of transnational forms of governance and thereby contributes to recent efforts to build clearer theoretical propositions on the basis of more nuanced theoretically and empirically informed analyses.
Human Ecology, 2019
High demand and prices in global markets for luxury seafood fished by coastal communities in low-income contexts causes overfishing. There are few alternatives for fishers to earn money, most institutions for controlling effort are weak, and markets are beyond the control of fishing states. The mismatch between desires for development and governance measures to enable that development is shared across many high-value low-income contexts. Using the sea cucumber fishery of Papua New Guinea as an example, this paper illustrates how the interactive governance framework provides a holistic approach to revealing governability limits and opportunities. Analysis of the system to be governed demonstrates that development for coastal communities is fundamental to the fishery as a motivating force and as a principle legitimising actions within the fishery and its management. This analysis highlights the fact that fisheries management is based on the assumption that an open fishery will lead to development, due to its economic value. However, money does not equal development. For this and other similar fisheries to increase development in coastal communities, issues not usually considered within the purview of the management of fisheries must be addressed, including gendered and intergenerational decision-making and income distribution, financial planning and government provision of infrastructure and services.
Closing the gap: Building capacity in Pacific fisheries governance and institutions
2008
Governance and institutions must function effectively if sustainable development and growth are to occur within the Pacific Islands region. In 2007, the FFA and the Australian Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), supported by funding from AusAID, contracted Quentin Hanich, Feleti Teo and Professor Martin Tsamenyi to research governance and institutional gaps within the region that undermine the effective management and development of the region\u27s fish stocks. Following an intensive round of interviews throughout the Pacific islands region by all three consultants, Mr Hanich authored a comprehensive report that discussed relevant governance and institutional gaps and recommended a number of potential capacity building responses