A THEORETICAL APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING INTERNATIONAL POLITICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE (original) (raw)
Related papers
International Political Theory and Global Environmental Issues
ESCAE JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND SECURITY (EJMSS), 2022
As environmental problems transcend national boundaries, they come to be a feature of international politics. This paper seeks to draw a distinction between two ways of thinking about the relationship between international political theory and the global environment. It scrutinizes five sets of arguments which suggest that the traditionalist account of the scope of international political theory provides an inadequate basis for apprehending, comprehending and rationalizing the problems of global environmental change, and which, in disparate ways and to a varied extent, do indeed open up the possibility of a 'fundamental discontinuity in the system of states'. This paper points out that detailed consideration of these arguments is imperative both to understand and illuminate the still very important state-centred agenda of 'traditional' international political theory and to understand the ways in which environmental problems and politics may be altering dominant frames of reference and suggesting a broader, if murkier, scope for international political theory. This paper also indicates that environmental issues have become increasingly prominent on the international agenda over the last sixty years assisted by the effects of globalization. It shows how this has prompted attempts to arrange cooperation between states and surveys the form and function of such activity with reference to some of the main international environmental regimes. Because climate change has become a problem of such enormous significance, a separate section is devoted to the efforts to create an international climate regime. This is followed by a brief consideration of how some of the theoretical parts of international relations (IR) relate to international environmental politics.
Climate Change and International Relations (After Kyoto)
Annual Review of Political Science
This review “diagnoses” climate change as an international governance challenge and explores the political feasibility of alternative “cures.” Human activities’ growing effect on Earth's climate system is extremely challenging, characterized by, inter alia, very long time lags between mitigation measures (∼costs) and environmental effects (∼benefits) and by stark asymmetries between “guilt” in causing the problem and vulnerability to climate change. Two main cures have been suggested. Some analysts argue that because climate change is a global process, adequate solutions must likewise be global. Others shift attention from the challenge's format to the sources of human motivation, arguing that a decentralized (bottom-up) approach will more directly engage a wider spectrum of motivations and actors. These cures are neither mutually exclusive nor easily combined. IR research contributes more to the former cure than to the latter but can play a constructive role in linking them.
Italian Law Journal, 2021
Climate change is one of the most wicked problems we have to deal with in the 21st century. No need to say, it is a problem of politics. The paper will first outline, taking a historical perspective, the institutional developments global climate change governance has been experiencing within the last two decades, with a particular focus on the contrast between Kyoto Protocol (KP) and Paris Agreement (PA) and their distinctive mode of governance. It is going to argue that the PA created an atmosphere not only for the flourishing of transnational and national actors but also for the popping up the Green New Deals all across the world. The conflictual relationship between different national legal orders is likely to turn to a more coordinated one thanks to the fertile mode of governance established with the PA. In its final part, the article will analyze this turn to cooperative relationship, upon having shown the deficiencies of GAL and mere political approaches, through the lenses of inter- legality.
This paper investigates the links between climate change, the mechanisms of global political economy and the pattern of relations among states. Robert Cox's critical theory links the elements of production with the structure of the world order through consideration of the interaction among the triad of: material forces, ideas and institutions, together constituting a historical structure subject to transformation through counter-hegemonic forces. World order as used in this study is defined as the pattern of relations among states constituted as a function of global political economy and held in place by means of institutional hegemony. Thus the impending change in world order due to climate change, in the limited sense of this research, represents a potential change in the structure of global political economy. The paper hypothesizes that the emerging discourses on climate change have the potential to unleash sufficiently powerful social forces to impact the structure of global political economy. The paper takes world order (or the structure of global political economy) as a level of analysis for interaction between the human and the natural world as well as the object of transformation through this interaction. Antonio Gramsci's concept of hegemony and counter-hegemony is used to investigate three climate change discourses with the potential respectively of maintaining, transitioning and transforming the World Order. The paper concludes that the prevailing order is untenable and will either transition over time or will transform, if it meets the projections of its associated discourse.
Climate Change in the Context of International Relations
Similarly to other environmental problems, the planetary scope of climate change has challenged important aspects of the current dynamics of international relations. The need for concrete action to address the problem and reduce it (mitigation) or diminish its impacts (adaptation) presupposes not only the development of science and technology but also, more importantly, a radical change in the production and consumption patterns now prevalent in countries, and this indirectly brings consequences for the power relations among these actors. Furthermore, climate change, by ignoring legal borders between states, demands new forms of governance, and forces a discussion about the concept of sovereignty, its fundamental elements, and its application. In view of these facts, the aim of this article is to bring to discussion the (in)ability of the current dynamics of international relations to respond effectively to global environmental problems, particularly global climate change. This stud...
THE EMERGING DISCOURSES ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE WORLD ORDER
This paper investigates the links between climate change, the mechanisms of global political economy and the pattern of relations among states. Robert Cox's critical theory links the elements of production with the structure of the world order through consideration of the interaction among the triad of: material forces, ideas and institutions, together constituting a historical structure subject to transformation through counter-hegemonic forces. World order as used in this study is defined as the pattern of relations among states constituted as a function of global political economy and held in place by means of institutional hegemony. Thus the impending change in world order due to climate change, in the limited sense of this research, represents a potential change in the structure of global political economy. The paper hypothesizes that the emerging discourses on climate change have the potential to unleash sufficiently powerful social forces to impact the structure of global political economy. The paper takes world order (or the structure of global political economy) as a level of analysis for interaction between the human and the natural world as well as the object of transformation through this interaction. Antonio Gramsci's concept of hegemony and counter-hegemony is used to investigate three climate change discourses with the potential respectively of maintaining, transitioning and transforming the World Order. The paper concludes that the prevailing order is untenable and will either transition over time or will transform, if it meets the projections of its associated discourse.
Climate change as a global political issue
Atoms for Peace: an International Journal, 2012
The battle against climate change has placed decarbonised capitalism on the economic, political and social agenda. But the shift towards a regime of accumulation compatible with measures to mitigate climate change raises major issues regarding prosperity and power, on a human and political scale never previously entertained. The paper places climate change in the context of the dynamics of the system which caused that change, namely capitalism. The ecological crisis is one manifestation of the crisis gripping the present regime of accumulation, which has reached a financialised, globalised stage. This being the case, any attempt to halt climate change, far from being an environmental issue, must be seen as a problem for the development model of both North and South.
Climate Change: National Interests or a Global Regime?
Global Environmental Governance: …, 2002
This chapter addresses the ultimate global environmental governance challenge: climate change. It explores four key questions: 1) Who is responsible for climate change? 2) Who is affected by its consequences? 3) Who should act in response? and 4) What is to be done? Climate change is profoundly different from most other environmental problems humanity has faced. The atmosphere's planetary scale and scope make it a "global public good," prone to overexploitation and underregulation. The multiplicity of causes of climate change, the uncertainty of timing and effects, and substantial economic costs make global agreement difficult to attain and maintain. Along with a challenge to material wellbeing, however, the climate change problem poses an ethical dilemma stemming from the large physical, social, and even temporal distances between emitters and victims of climate change. Climate change requires a global response, encompassing the North and the South, local and global communities, and the public and private sectors. Ranging from global negotiations to individual choices, a diversity of actors with different resource endowments, and diverging values and aspirations, need to be involved. Success will depend on the substance and equity of national commitments and on the process developed for promoting global-scale cooperation. Four conditions need to be emphasized in building a global climate regime: 1) adequate information, 2) issue linkage and bargaining, 3) technological potential, and 4) a shift in values. climate change and global governance All social structures humanity has ever built have required some form of management. As societies evolved from tribes to kingdoms and from kingdoms to nation-states, they were governed both at an increasingly larger scale, and with increasing levels of complexity. Tribes were managed as relatively simple top-down structures, where the center of influence was the tribe itself, and the circumference of interdependence was the geographically surrounding tribes. Nationstates developed more complex systems of governance, and pushed the circumference of interdependence beyond neighboring states. In the era of globalization, however, governance issues have moved to a global level in response to a growing recognition of planetary interdependence. Climate change is one of the first truly global environmental challenges. Several key features distinguish it from other environmental problems: • The atmosphere is a classic example of a global public goodgreenhouse gas emissions in one country affect the entire planet; conversely, emission controls in any country benefit all, encouraging "free riding" on the efforts of others;
International Relations, the Environment, and Green Theory
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (6 ed.). , 2024
This chapter explores the ways in which environmental concerns feature in International Rela-tions (IR) theory. It provides a brief introduction to the ecological crisis and the emergence of green theorizing in the social sciences and humanities in general, and then tracks the status and impact of environmental issues and green thinking in IR theory. It shows how mainstream ra-tionalist IR theories, such as neorealism and neoliberalism, have constructed environmental problems merely as a ‘new issue area’ that can be approached through pre-existing theoretical frameworks. These approaches are contrasted with more critical green IR theories, which chal-lenge the state-centric framework, rationalist analysis, and ecological blindness of orthodox IR theories and offer a range of new environmental interpretations of international justice, account-ability, development, order, and security. In the case study, climate change is explored to high-light the diversity of theoretical approaches, including the distinctiveness of different green ap-proaches, in understanding how the international is relevant to global environmental crisis.