The correlation between coach-athlete relationship and motivation among Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Shah Alam athhletes (original) (raw)
Related papers
Relationship between Coach’s Leadership Style and Motivation of Male Athletes
Jurnal Maenpo : Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Kesehatan dan Rekreasi
Each coach has a distinctive leadership style, and each coach's leadership style has its advantages and disadvantages. Trainers have several leadership behaviors/actions in training. There are several coach-style behaviors, i.e., training/instruction, authoritarian, democracy, social support, and feedback. This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship between the coach's leadership style and male athletes’ motivation. This research method uses a descriptive correlation research design. The samples in this study were active student members of the men's futsal student activity unit of the Indonesian Education University. The data collection technique used a random sampling technique. The instruments used were The Leadership Scale for Sport (LSS) to measure the coach's leadership style and SMS (Social Motivation Scale) to measure male athletes’ motivation. This study was analyzed using parametric statistical analysis with the Pearson correlation test. The...
2019
This study is aimed to compare coaching behavior among football coaches and to determine its’ effects on the motivation of football athletes in Malaysian sports’ school A total of 123 football athletes (mean age = 15.30 years, SD = 1.61 years) from three different sport schools were chosen using the simple random sampling method. The survey used Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport (CBS-S) to measure coaching behavior and Sport Motivation Scale (SMS) to measure the athletes’ motivation. Descriptive and inference analysis, one-way ANOVA and regression analysis were used to analyze the collected data. The results showed that there are significant differences in coaching behaviors among the football coaches in six out of seven dimensions of coaching behaviors. There are also significant differences showed in two out of the seven types of motivation and there are significant relationships between four coaching behaviors dimensions and six types of motivation and only negative personal rap...
COACHING BEHAVIOR, MOTIVATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING IN YOUNG ATHLETES
The focus of the current research is to examine the relationship between coaching behavior, motivation and psychological wellbeing of young athletes. Sports is currently perceived as an apparatus that can aid incompletely conveying the related legislative social motivation. Coaches may improve performance of athletes by endorsing their psychological potentials, for instance, motivation, to direct training of sport skills. Motivation is demarcated as such collection of features that galvanize, and uphold behavior, usually in the direction of some goal. Psychologicawell-being portrays one of the most significant characteristics of effectual psychological functioning and is massively demarcated as life satisfaction, happiness, and self-growth. It was hypothesized that there will be a significant association in coaching behavior, motivation and psychological well-being of young athletes. Moreover, it was also hypothesized that coaching behavior and motivation act as predictors of psychological well-being.Correlation research design was used. Purposive sampling technique was employed to collect data. The sample consisted of 100 young athletes (53males, 47females) (M= 21.94, SD= 1.91). The Coaching Behavior Questionnaire, The Sports Motivation Scale and Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale were used as assessment measures.Pearson Product Moment Correlation and Multiple Linear Regression were used for evaluating results of the research. Results showed that there was a significant positive correlation between coaching behavior and psychological wellbeing (β= .77) measured through Pearson Correlation. Regression results showed that Coaching behavior and motivation are found to be the significant predictors of domains of psychological wellbeing (Autonomy (r2= .32), environmental mastery (r2= .35) and positive relation (r2= .23)) in young athletes measured through multiple regression.The findings of the present study can be taken as useful reference for sports educators and athletes, and in the long run, they can enhance athletic standards and contribute to sport development in Pakistani communities.l
Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2017
Objective: Grounded in self-determination theory, the present study examined the cultural invariance of a model that hypothesized sport performers' well-being will be predicted by both their perceptions of motivation and the quality of the relationship held with their coach. Method: Participants (N = 756), originating from five countries (British, Chinese, Greek, Spanish, and Swedish), completed a questionnaire that measured perceived coach-athlete relationship quality, basic psychological need satisfaction, self-determined motivation, and well-being. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was employed to analyze the data. Results: Analysis revealed that athletes who perceived a high quality relationship experienced heightened levels of basic need satisfaction. Need satisfaction positively predicted self-determined motivation, which, in turn, linked to enhanced well-being. Moreover, mediation analyses supported the explanatory roles of need satisfaction and self-determined motivation within the model. Lastly, multi-sample SEM invariance testing revealed the model to be largely invariant across cultures. Conclusions: The results support the universal application of self-determination theory and the central role interpersonal relationships play in promoting well-being.
Level of Motivational Factors of Athletes in Relation to Their Sports Participation
European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science
Purpose: This study aimed to measure the level of motivational factors of athletes in relation to their sports participation. The study reveals the highest and lowest motivational factors among athletes and the team that are perceived as most and least motivated. Methods and Materials: The study is quantitative in nature. A purposive sampling technique was chosen to get the sample from the population. The research sample consists of student-athletes from Far Eastern University. These student-athletes are enrolled in the academic year 2022-2023. The research is limited to seven (7) participating sports such as Athletics, Basketball, Cheering Squad, Dance Troupe, Table Tennis, Taekwondo, and Table Tennis. Each sport has seven (7) men and women, a total of ninety-eight (98) participants. The instrument used in this study is a standard questionnaire. The Sports Motivation Scale (SMS-28) of Pelletier et. al was used to measure the level of motivational factors of athletes in relation to ...
Investigation of Relationship between Coach and Athlete in terms of Different Variables
Universal Journal of Educational Research
This research was conducted for the purpose of establishing the relationship of individuals doing sports in various branches in the Province Ağrı with their coaches in terms of the branch they are engaged in and some demographical variables. In the research, a method oriented to the descriptive survey which aims to present the present situation was used. The research group is consisted of totally 95 athletes; 28 of whom are females and 67 are males who do sports in various branches in Ağrı. The Scale of Coach-Athlete Relationship (S-CAR) which was developed by Jowett and Ntoumanis (2004), measures the quality of coach-athlete relationship and was adapted into Turkish by Ekenci et al., (2017) was used as data collection tool. Mann-Whitney U Test was used for the paired comparison and Kruskal-Wallis Variance Analysis was used for multiple comparisons in the analysis of data. In cases where there is significant difference at the end of Kruskal Wallis Variance Analysis in the multiple comparisons, Mann Whitney U Test was applied for determining that which groups caused to this difference. p=0.05 was selected for the significance level in the research. At the end of the research, it was found out that the age variable does not vary significantly in the coach-athlete relationship. Again there are no significant differences by the license years and branch variable. However, it was found that there are significant variables when gender and educational background of the participants were examined.
Review of European Studies, 2014
The primary concerns of this study is whether universities' sport coaches possess good coaching competency skills in bringing up potential athletes for the country. What are coaches' coaching competency levels? Do their competencies capability able to contribute significantly to sport achievement motivation of student-athletes? Thus, this study was designed to evaluate the competency level of coaches and student-athletes' achievement motivation at the Higher Educational Institutions (HEI) in sports competitions. A total of 322 student-athletes were participated in the questionnaire survey. Researchers have adapted the Coaching Competency Scale to measure four different dimensions of coaching competency and Sport Orientation Questionnaire to measure achievement motivation of student-athletes. Validity and reliability of the instrument were found to be satisfactory.The results of this study indicate that the coaches' competency levels at the HEI were not differ significantly by gender and performance of student-athletes, but it was differed significantly by type of sport, between team and individual sports. In addition, this study showed that there was a moderate relationship between the competencies of sport coaches and achievement motivation among student-athletes. However, among the coaches' coaching competencies, motivation competency of coaches was found to be significant contributor to student-athletes sport achievement motivation. The study provides important insights from the perspective of sport development programme at the related organizations which can be valuable in identifying and recruiting suitable coaches; and helping coaches to some extent in planning strategies for coaching athletes to ensure the effectiveness of its role as a coach.
The Coach-athlete relationship and Self-determination
2014
One purpose of the present study was to develop and test the factor structure of a multidimensional and hierarchical instrument for measuring athlete-centered coaching called the Athlete-Centered Coaching Scale (ACS). Another purpose of the study was to validate the ACS through an inspection of the relation with the three psychological needs proposed by self-determination theory (SDT). The ACS was measured by a 16-item scale and was developed to capture important relational elements based on the theoretical framework developed by Carl Rogers. Need satisfaction was measured by a modified version of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work Scale (BPNSWS) that we named the Reduced Need Satisfaction Scale (RNSS). Participants in the study were 382 junior athletes in different sports such as cross country skiing, nordic combined, ski jumping, volleyball, handball, track and field, ice hockey, biathlon, cycling and orienteering. Both the ACS and the SDT were investigated by means of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) before a structural model was tested. The confirmatory factor analyses supported both a first and second order model of the ACS constituting the four dimensions of the ACS; (1) Congruence, 2) Empathy, 3) Positive regard, and 4) Commonness. The structural model had acceptable fit to data and revealed that the ACS was positively related to SDT. The present study extends the literature on athletecentered coaching and its relation to other concepts. The results of the study are discussed together with limitations and suggestions for further research.
The coach-athlete relationship: a motivational model
Journal of sports sciences, 2003
The aim of this paper is to present a motivational model of the coach-athlete relationship that describes how coaches may influence athletes' motivation. In line with cognitive evaluation theory (Deci and Ryan, 1980, 1985) and the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (Vallerand, 1997, 2000), a motivational sequence is proposed where coaches' personal orientation towards coaching, the context within which they operate, and their perceptions of their athletes' behaviour and motivation influence coaches' behaviours. Also, coaches' behaviours in the form of autonomy-supportive behaviours, provision of structure and involvement have a beneficial impact on athletes' needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness, which, in turn, nurture athletes' intrinsic motivation and self-determined types of extrinsic motivation. Here, we first review coaches' autonomy-supportive behaviours. We then describe the psychological processes through which ...
Journal sur l'identité, les relations interpersonnelles et les relations intergroupes, 2017
The present study was created to better understand the influence of coaches on student-athlete's motivation. The goal of this study was to determine how the student-athlete's motivation level is affected by the type of relationship between the coach and the student-athlete in comparison to non-athletes. The hypothesis is that athelete status (student-athlete or non-athlete) impacts perceived motivation when faced with a particular coach ("supportive" or "non-supportive"). The approach was to conduct a two-group experiment providing participants with two different scenarios. One of two scenarios was presented to manipulate the perception of a coach. Forty participants participated in this study. The recruited participants were either studentathletes or non-athletes. All participants were recruited from a Historically Black Institution: 58% were male, 42% female. The results indicate that the type of coach will differently impact a student-athlete's motivation than a non-athlete. More specifically, both student-athletes and non-athletes perceive a "supportive" coach to be more supportive; however student-athletes perceive "non-supportive" coaches to be less encouraging than non-athletes. The findings from this study suggest that student-athletes and nonathletes perceive a non-supportive coach differently.