GANEing traction: The broad applicability of NE hotspots to diverse cognitive and arousal phenomena (original) (raw)
Related papers
Existing brain-based emotion-cognition theories fail to explain arousal's ability to both enhance and impair cognitive processing. In the Glutamate Amplifies Noradrenergic Effects (GANE) model outlined in this paper, we propose that arousal-induced norepinephrine (NE) released from the locus coeruleus (LC) biases perception and memory in favor of salient, high priority representations at the expense of lower priority representations. This increase in gain under phasic arousal occurs via synaptic self-regulation of NE based on glutamate levels. When the LC is phasically active, elevated levels of glutamate at the site of prioritized representations increase local NE release, creating “NE hot spots.” At these local hot spots, glutamate and NE release are mutually enhancing and amplify activation of prioritized representations. This excitatory effect contrasts with widespread NE suppression of weaker representations via lateral and auto-inhibitory processes. On a broader scale, hot spots increase oscillatory synchronization across neural ensembles transmitting high priority information. Furthermore, key brain structures that detect or pre-determine stimulus priority interact with phasic NE release to preferentially route such information through large-scale functional brain networks. A surge of NE before, during or after encoding enhances synaptic plasticity at sites of high glutamate activity, triggering local protein synthesis processes that enhance selective memory consolidation. Together, these noradrenergic mechanisms increase perceptual and memory selectivity under arousal. Beyond explaining discrepancies in the emotion-cognition literature, GANE reconciles and extends previous influential theories of LC neuromodulation by highlighting how NE can produce such different outcomes in processing based on priority.
Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011
Group II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR2 and mGluR3, encoded by GRM2 and GRM3) are implicated in hippocampal function and cognition, and in the pathophysiology and treatment of schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders. However, pharmacological and behavioral studies with group II mGluR agonists and antagonists have produced complex results. Here, we studied hippocampus-dependent memory in GRM2/3 double knockout (GRM2/3 À/À ) mice in an iterative sequence of experiments. We found that they were impaired on appetitively motivated spatial reference and working memory tasks, and on a spatial novelty preference task that relies on animals' exploratory drive, but were unimpaired on aversively motivated spatial memory paradigms. GRM2/3 À/À mice also performed normally on an appetitively motivated, non-spatial, visual discrimination task. These results likely reflect an interaction between GRM2/3 genotype and the arousal-inducing properties of the experimental paradigm. The deficit seen on appetitive and exploratory spatial memory tasks may be absent in aversive tasks because the latter induce higher levels of arousal, which rescue spatial learning. Consistent with an altered arousal-cognition relationship in GRM2/3 À/À mice, injection stress worsened appetitively motivated, spatial working memory in wild-types, but enhanced performance in GRM2/3 À/À mice. GRM2/3 À/À mice were also hypoactive in response to amphetamine. This fractionation of hippocampus-dependent memory depending on the appetitive-aversive context is to our knowledge unique, and suggests a role for group II mGluRs at the interface of arousal and cognition. These arousal-dependent effects may explain apparently conflicting data from previous studies, and have translational relevance for the involvement of these receptors in schizophrenia and other disorders.
Norepinephrine as a Spatial Memory Reset Signal
bioRxiv, 2020
Contextual information is represented in the hippocampus (HPC) partially through the recruitment of distinct neuronal ensembles. It is believed that reactivation of these ensembles underlies memory retrieval processes. Recently, we showed that norepinephrine (NE) input from phasic locus coeruleus (LC) activation induces hippocampal plasticity resulting in the recruitment of new neurons and a disengagement from previously established representations. We hypothesize that NE may provide a neuromodulatory, mnemonic switch signaling the HPC to move from a state of retrieval to encoding in the presence of novelty, and therefore, plays a role in memory updating. Here, we tested whether bilateral dorsal dentate gyrus (DG) infusions of the β-adrenergic receptor (BAR) agonist isoproterenol (ISO), administered prior to encoding or retrieval, would impair spatial working and reference memory by reverting the system to encoding (thereby recruiting new neurons) potentially interfering with retrie...
Locus coeruleus-evoked responses in behaving rats: A clue to the role of noradrenaline in memory
Brain Research Bulletin, 1994
coeruleus-evoked responses in behaving rats: A clue IO the role of noradrenuline in memory. BRAIN RES BULL 35(5/Q 457-465, 1994.-Neuromodulatory properties of noradrenaline (NA) suggest that the coreruieo-cortical NA projection should play an important role in attention and memory processes. Our research is aimed at providing some behavioral evidence. Single units of the locus coeruleus (LC) are recorded during controlled behavioral situations, in order to relate LC activation to specific behavioral contexts. LC cells respond in burst to imposed novel sensory stimuli or to novel objects encountered during free exploration. When there is no predictive value of the stimulus or no behavioral response required, there is rapid habituation of the LC response. When a stimulus is then associated with reinforcement, there is a renewed response, which is transient. During extinction, LC neuronal responses reappear. Thus, LC cells respond to novelty or change in incoming imformation, but do not have a sustained response to stimuli, even when they have a high level of biological significance. The gating and tuning action of NA released in target sensory systems would promote selective attention to relevant stimuli at the critical moment of change. The adaptive behavioral outcome would result from the integration of retrieved memory with the sensory info~ation selected from the envi~nment. Memory Novelty response Habituation Single-unit activity Behaving rat Hole board Locus coeruleus Noradrenaline MEMORY is a biological adaptation that permits an organism to use past experience to adjust its behavior to changing environmental imperatives and it is assumed to be a result of leaminginduced, long-lasting changes in functional connectivity among neurons. The significance of the memory for adaptive behavior lies in its retrieval, which depends, not upon static connections among neurons, but upon the outputs of dynamic networks. These outputs, in turn, are not fixed, but are very much dependent upon the state of the system. In this way, a single network can perform several functions (7,8) and underly more than one memory. The state of the system is mediated by the action of neuromodulatory influences, originating, for the most part, in brain stem and basal forebrain nuclei, principally, locus coeruleus (LC) and nucleus basalis. Thus biological theories of memory must take into account these brain stem influences on forebrain activity, reactivity, and plasticity. Nemom~ulators influence fimctional connectivity within a network by modifying both the intrinsic properties of the cellular components and their synaptic interactions [(2) for general review]. As early as 1970, it was proposed that noradrenaline (NA) should play an essential role in learning and memory by "permitting or even accentuating activity in (synapses) that are ~~s~~ing novel or significant stimuli" (11). Indeed, many subsequent studies have shown that NA has several postsynaptic actions that would lend support to Kety's intuitive hypothesis. a) Although inhibiting spontaneous activity, NA can enhance, or even permit, cellular responses to ' To whom requests for reprints should be addressed. This article is being published without the authors' review of the proofs, which were not available at press time.
Emotional enhancement of memory: how norepinephrine enables synaptic plasticity
Changes in synaptic strength are believed to underlie learning and memory. We explore the idea that norepinephrine is an essential modulator of memory through its ability to regulate synaptic mechanisms. Emotional arousal leads to activation of the locus coeruleus with the subsequent release of norepineprine in the brain, resulting in the enhancement of memory. Norepinephrine activates both pre-and post-synaptic adrenergic receptors at central synapses with different functional outcomes, depending on the expression pattern of these receptors in specific neural circuitries underlying distinct behavioral processes. We review the evidence for noradrenergic modulation of synaptic plasticity with consideration of how this may contribute to the mechanisms of learning and memory.
Noradrenergic Mechanisms of Arousal’s Bidirectional Effects on Episodic Memory
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 2016
Arousal's selective effects on cognition go beyond the simple enhancement of emotional stimuli, sometimes enhancing and other times impairing processing of proximal neutral information. Past work shows that arousal impairs encoding of subsequent neutral stimuli regardless of their top-down priority via the engagement of β-adrenoreceptors. In contrast, retrograde amnesia induced by emotional arousal can flip to enhancement when preceding neutral items are prioritized in top-down attention. Whether β-adrenoreceptors also contribute to this retrograde memory enhancement of goal-relevant neutral stimuli is unclear. In this pharmacological study, we administered 40mg of propranolol or 40mg of placebo to healthy young adults to examine whether emotional arousal's bidirectional effects on declarative memory relies on β-adrenoreceptor activation. Following pill intake, participants completed an emotional oddball task in which they were asked to prioritize a neutral object appearing just before an emotional or neutral oddball image within a sequence of 7 neutral objects. Under placebo, emotional oddballs impaired memory for lower priority oddball+1 objects but had no effect on memory for high priority oddball-1 objects. Propranolol blocked this anterograde amnesic effect of arousal. Emotional oddballs also enhanced selective memory trade-offs significantly more in the placebo than drug condition, such that high priority oddball-1 objects were more likely to be remembered at the cost of their corresponding lower priority oddball+1 objects under arousal. Lastly, those who recalled more high priority oddball-1 objects preceding an emotional versus neutral oddball image showed greater increases in salivary alpha-amylase, a biomarker of noradrenergic system activation, across the task. Together these findings suggest that different noradrenergic mechanisms contribute to the anterograde and retrograde mnemonic effects of arousal on proximal neutral memoranda.
Are glutamate receptors specifically implicated in some forms of memory processes?
Experimental Brain Research, 1998
Convergent data indicate that certain substances that interact with N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors or metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) do not affect acquisition processes per se, or retrieval, but interfere specifically with the formation of memory traces. This action differs widely in its amplitude and time-course according to the learning task used. We showed that systemic injection of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonists, g-l-glutamyl-l-aspartate (g-LGLA) and 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonate (CPP), or intracerebroventricular infusion of d-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (D-AP5), immediately following acquisition of a Y-maze avoidance learning task in mice, deeply impaired retention of the temporal component of the task (leaving the start alley within the first 5 s of a trial), which significantly improved in controls during the hours following acquisition. In contrast the same substances had no or only slight effects on retention of the discrimination component (choice of the correct alley), which did not improve over time in control animals. This retention deficit did not appear to be due to an action on acquisition, retrieval and/or forgetting processes, or to state-dependent effects. Moreover, g-LGLA, CPP or AP5, when administered immediately after partial acquisition of a food-reinforced bar-press task, suppressed the spontaneous improvement in post-training performance observed in control mice 24 h after the training session. (R,S)-a-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG), an antagonist of mGluRs, also suppressed the post-training performance increment and its effects were antagonized by the co-administration of trans-ACPD, an agonist of mGluRs. Post-training improvement of performance over time is thought to reflect an active and dynamic process, leading to the organization of memory traces. According to this hypothesis, our results suggest that synaptic plasticity mediated by NMDA receptors and/or mGluRs activation is involved in mechanisms underlying long-term consolidation of memory traces.
F1000 - Post-publication peer review of the biomedical literature, 2012
Neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) receive feedforward input from the thalamus, which shapes receptive-field properties. They additionally receive recurrent inputs via horizontal connections within V1 and feedback from higher visual areas that are thought to be important for conscious visual perception. Here, we investigated what roles different glutamate receptors play in conveying feedforward and recurrent inputs in macaque V1. As a measure of recurrent processing, we used figure-ground modulation (FGM), the increased activity of neurons representing figures compared with background, which depends on feedback from higher areas. We found that feedforward-driven activity was strongly reduced by the AMPA receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), whereas this drug had no effect on FGM. In contrast, blockers of the NMDA receptor reduced FGM, whereas their effect on visually driven activity varied with the subunit specificity of the drug. The NMDA receptor blocker 2amino-5-phosphonovalerate (APV) caused a slight reduction of the visual response, whereas ifenprodil, which targets NMDA receptors containing the NMDA receptor NR2B subunit, increased the visual response. These findings demonstrate that glutamate receptors contribute differently to feedforward and recurrent processing in V1 and suggest ways to selectively disrupt recurrent processing so that its role in visual perception can be elucidated.