Predicting Adolescent Moral Reasoning from Family Climate:A Longitudinal Study (original) (raw)
Related papers
Parental Morality and Family Processes as Predictors of Adolescent Morality
Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2000
This study investigated the extent to which parents' moral thought and family processes are involved in the socialization of adolescent moral thought. Olson et al's (1992) Circumplex Model and White's (2000) Family Socialization Model provided the conceptual framework for predicting that families high in cohesion, adaptability and communication would facilitate the transmission of moral values between parents and adolescents more effectively than families low in these family processes. Results involving 218 adolescent-parent dyads revealed that perceived family cohesion and communication moderated the father-adolescent moral thought relationship; that several facets of both parents' morality significantly predicted adolescents' morality; and that all three family processes significantly predicted certain aspects of adolescent morality. Therefore the extent to which parents' socialize adolescent moral values will vary according to each parent's moral view, the strength of family processes and the content of moral thought being transmitted.
Parenting Style and the Development of Moral Reasoning
Journal of Moral Education, 1999
This paper addresses the polarisation among theoretical perspectives in moral psychology regarding the relative signi® cance of parents and peers in children' s moral development and, in particular, the short shrift given the family context by cognitive± developmental theory. W e contend that parents do play a signi® cant role in this area of their children' s development. Research ® ndings from tw o studies are presented which indicate that parents' interaction styles, ego functioning and level of moral reasoning used in discussion are predictive of children' s subsequent moral reasoning development. The ® ndings also illustrate the role of affective factors, in contrast to the contemporary emphasis on moral rationality, and the relevance of real-life dilemmas, in contrast to the paradigmatic reliance on hypothetical dilemmas. Implications of these ® ndings for our understanding of the role of parenting style in children' s moral development and for further research are discussed.
Parent and Peer Contexts for Children's Moral Reasoning Development
Child Development, 2000
This study addressed the polarization among theoretical perspectives in moral psychology regarding the relative significance of parents and peers in children's developing moral maturity. The sample was composed of 60 target children from late childhood and midadolescence, 60 parents, and 60 friends who participated in parent/child and friend/child dyadic discussions of a series of moral conflicts. The quality of parents' and friends' verbal interactions, ego functioning, and level of moral reasoning in these discussions was used to predict the rate of children's moral reasoning development over a 4-year longitudinal interval. Results revealed that interactions with both parents and peers were predictive of children's development but that these two types of relationships influence development in rather different ways. Implications of the findings for the understanding of these socialization agents' roles in moral development are discussed.
Talking Good": Family Communication and Children's Morality
1991
The contemporary influence on the study of child morality has come from the cognitive-stage theories of Jean Piaget, who skewed the focus on interpersonal communication away from the family to the peer play domain. Aside from this approach, there are two other psychological approaches to moral development: psychoanalytic theory and social learning theory. Furthermore, the theories on parenting or discipline style and family systems are less theoretically grounded, but nonetheless influential approaches. Another way to examine parentil effects on moral development is by focusing on outcomes-on the different dimensions of moral development, such as altruism. Despite the Piagetian bias against parental nurturance, researchers have found that loving parents at higher stages of development who explain their parenting behaviors to their children and who encourage their children to participate in family discussions of moral issues and to consider multiple perspectives are more likely to have children who can reason at more mature moral stages. In additton, when parents are trained to discuss moral issues with their children more openly, the children's moral reasoning development is accelerated. As a direct response to the school-based attempts to accelerate children's and adolescents' moral reasoning development, M. W. Berkowitz and J. C. Gibbs developed a model of moral discussion behavior termed "transactive discussion." Subsequent research projects on this model suggest that adolescents discuss moral issues differently with parents than with peers, but that the effect of the family on the children's moral development is a strong one. (Fifty references are attached.) (PRA)
Family Interactions and the Development of Moral Reasoning
Child Development, 1991
WALKER, LAWRENCE J., and TAYLOH, JOHN H. Family Interactions atid the Development of Moral Reasoning. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1991, 62, 264-283. The study examined parents* role in their chiidren's moral reasoning develogmertt. I^^^^H^' ^velof tnoialct^Eistialng ...
Parent-Child Interaction Variables Related to the Moral Reasoning of High School Senior Males
1984
Parent-Child Interaction Variables Related to the Moral Reasoning of High School Senior Males by Bruce R. Johns, Doctor of Philosophy Utah State University, 1984 Major Professor: Dr. Keith T. Checketts Psychology Department: The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship of parent-child interaction variables to moral reasoning and to identify those variables that best predict moral reasoning. Subjects were 51 high scho6l senior males and their parents from intact families. Parents and sons completed separate questionnaires designed to measure the following variables: moral reasoning, induction, power-assertion, love-withdrawal, authoritarian attitudes, intrusiveness, support, communication, socio-economic status and academic achievement. The instruments used to measure these variables were the Defining Issues Test, Parent-Child Relationship II Questionnaire, Child-Rearing Questionnaire, Child-Rearing Practices Report, Traditional Family Ideology
Parenting styles and moral judgment among adolescents
International journal of applied research, 2016
The purpose of this study was to study the parenting styles adopted by parents of adolescents; to study the moral judgment among adolescents; and to study the relationship between the parenting styles and the moral judgment among adolescents. The study was conducted on one hundred adolescents of senior secondary classes of Newai, Tonk (Rajasthan). The tools used were: Parental Authority Questionnaire by J.R. Buri (1991) and Moral Judgment Test by George Lind (1999). Result showed that the correlation values of two parenting styles (permissive and authoritative) are positive though showing weak correlation while for authoritarian parenting style the correlation value is negative though showing a weak correlation.
Developmental Review, 1997
In his article, Tappan cogently outlines a sociocultural perspective on moral development which conceptualizes moral activity as mediated activity. He notes that such a perspective: 1) gives a much different account of moral development than current accounts (e.g., cognitive-developmental); and 2) addresses fundamental questions on the origins of moral sensibilities and differences in moral functioning. This commentary extends Tappan's approach by offering a framework for analyzing discourse during parent-child interactions about moral matters using speech genres (Bakhtin, 1986) and registers . Such detailed analysis affords the simultaneous consideration of the social, cultural, and historical influences on moral development. In doing so, the framework locates the origins of moral sensibilities and differences in moral functioning in the discourse parents and children share during moral activities. Two personal experiences are offered as illustrations of the framework.
Parents' Roles and Parenting Styles on Shaping Children's Morality
Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2020
Nowadays, we live in a modern world which has been engulfed by a wave of technology. The changes in the modern world have brought some alterations to our life. The good side brought by the technology is that our life becomes better and better. However, the morality in our children is found deteriorating. Therefore, the paper is going to study, to which extent the parents' roles and parenting styles are in shaping the children's moral development. The data was collected from online database including ScienceDirect, Wiley, ResearchGate, Procedia and Google. Both qualitative and quantitative studies, which were published from year 2009 to 2018 were reviewed systematically and synthesized in a narrative format. The findings of this study were that the parents should play their roles in shaping the children's morality. They should involve themselves in their family, being role models instilling religious beliefs, communicating more often with their children and providing bonding time for their children with their grandparents. For parenting styles, the results showed that the most effective parenting style was authoritative parenting followed by authoritarian. Both the permissive parenting styles were ineffective in encouraging children's morality.