Institutional Strategies of Higher Education Reform in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan: Differentiating to Survive Between State and Market (original) (raw)

Higher education reform and the landscape diversity ofhigher education institutions in the Kyrgyz Republic, 1991–2015

2018

Following its independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, Kyrgyzstan experienced processes of change across all areas of social, political and economic life. Higher education reform has been central to this agenda, and between 1991 and today the Soviet-era system of state-funded and Communist Party controlled higher education institutions (HEIs) in Kyrgyzstan has been transformed into an expansive, diverse, unequal, semi-privatized and marketized higher education (HE) landscape. Mindful of arguments that the marketization of higher education does not necessarily generate institutional diversification, that government regulation does not necessarily lead to homogenization among institutions, and that universities’ own institutional strategies and responses to environmental changes shape processes of structural reform in complex ways, this paper assesses the specific character of these changes to the higher education landscape in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan. After briefly describing the st...

The formation of National higher education systems of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan

International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science (IJAERS), 2020

This paper argues that during the pre-1991period the institutionalized context of the Soviet higher education governance was transformed dramatically, and has attempted to explain the outcomes for higher education from the pre-1991period and proposed the theory of “institutional dis/continuities”. The theory employs elements of historical institutionalism in the explanation of higher education governance changes during the Soviet and post- Soviet periods in the countries under review, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Uzbekistan. Historical institutionalism addresses the institutional changes in historical development. The changes are explained by “critical junctures”. Therefore, the pre-1991 period is seen as a critical juncture in this paper. They may be caused by times of great uncertainty. The changes were dramatic in spite of the short timeframe. This critical juncture period is identifiable subject to a reference to the Soviet period.

Comparing post-Soviet changes in higher education governance in Kazakhstan, Russia, and Uzbekistan

Cogent Education

This paper argues that during the perestroika period the institutionalised context of the Soviet higher education governance was transformed dramatically, and has attempted to explain the outcomes for higher education from the perestroika period and proposed the theory of "institutional dis/continuities". The theory employs elements of historical institutionalism in the explanation of higher education governance changes during the Soviet and post-Soviet periods in the countries under review, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Uzbekistan. Historical institutionalism addresses the institutional changes in historical development. The changes are explained by "critical junctures". Therefore, the perestroika period is seen as a critical juncture in this paper. They may be caused by times of great uncertainty. The changes were dramatic in spite of the short timeframe. This critical juncture period is identifiable subject to a reference to the Soviet period.

Higher Education in Uzbekistan: Reforms and the Changing Landscape since Independence

2016

This paper is the first study that carefully documents higher education reforms in Uzbekistan since the demise of the former Soviet Union. It analyses evolution of the sector with clear emphasis on government policy and its impact on changing the country's higher education landscape since independence. The study highlights complex interactions between the distinct pre-and postindependence contexts, policy legislation and its implementation on the one hand, and the demands of the new market-based economic system and the requirements of building and strengthening state institutions to support the transition process on the other hand. The paper will show why the country's peculiar 'strictly top-down' approach to reforms has not been successful on improving a number of key areas including access to higher education, and human as well as physical capacities of high education institutions which ultimately determine the quality of higher education provisioning.

Comparing post-Soviet changes in higher education governance in Kazakhstan, Russia, and Uzbekistan ABOUT THE AUTHORS

This paper argues that during the perestroika period the institutionalised context of the Soviet higher education governance was transformed dramatically, and has attempted to explain the outcomes for higher education from the perestroi-ka period and proposed the theory of " institutional dis/continuities ". The theory employs elements of historical institutionalism in the explanation of higher education governance changes during the Soviet and post-Soviet periods in the countries under review, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Uzbekistan. Historical institutionalism addresses the institutional changes in historical development. The changes are explained by " critical junctures ". Therefore, the perestroika period is seen as a critical juncture in this paper. They may be caused by times of great uncertainty. The changes were dramatic in spite of the short timeframe. This critical juncture period is identifiable subject to a reference to the Soviet period.

Developmental Perspectives of Higher Education in the Post-Soviet Countries (for the Cases of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan)

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013

The system of higher education is the foundation on which training of professional staff and the potential for development of a country are realized. The further development of the economy depends on the effectiveness of its educational system. In this paper the results of the development of higher education in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan after 20 years of independent development are given. An outlining of basic legal standards in the field of education in Central Asia is shown, general and specific features in the development of higher education are identified, and on the basis of that the attempt to consider the perspectives for the development of higher education will be made.

Keeping up with revolutions: evolution of higher education in Uzbekistan

Economic Change and Restructuring, 2010

Uzbekistan's higher education system has undergone some dramatic changes in the past century, evolving from largely traditional religious colleges to fully state-funded communist-atheist institutions. Since the end of the communist administration and subsequent market-oriented reforms, the institutions of higher education (IHE) in Uzbekistan have had to reinvent and reform themselves again, as the demand for different kind of education increased. This paper puts the current changes and trends in IHEs into an historical perspective and highlights some important effects of the market reforms on the educational scene.

Transformation of Higher Education in Central Asia for twenty years

The independence of Central Asian countries at the beginning of 1990"s had a strong impact on the higher education of all five Central Asian countries. We can observe tremendous changes within each of these countries in the system of higher education 20 years later due to many factors that incur some new opportunities and challenges. The objective of this paper is to provide some empirical results based on survey of 45 Central Asian universities. The survey reveals changes in different dimensions of higher education: from business competences of students, their level of internationalization, average salaries and research motivation of Faculty members till the estimated level of corruption by the representatives of higher education institutions of Central Asia. The representatives of the top and middle management of these institutions from different regions of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan were surveyed in 2010. The survey results showed some new and unexpected

Common Legacy: Evolution of the Institutional Landscape of Soviet Higher Education

Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education, 2018

The chapter describes the peculiarities of higher education policy and higher education landscape in the USSR republics during last decades of Soviet era. The authors provide an overview on the rationale for Soviet educational policy concerning higher education. Then the chapter proceeds with a structural description of the Soviet higher education system and its institutional diversity. The authors present a sustained account of factors that played a crucial role in the formation of Soviet higher educational institutions and the higher education landscape. The authors finally attempt to present the variations of the institutional landscape across Soviet republics.

Transformation of higher education in Central Asia for 20 years

The independence of Central Asian countries at the beginning of 1990‟s had a strong impact on the higher education of all five Central Asian countries. We can observe tremendous changes within each of these countries in the system of higher education 20 years later due to many factors that incur some new opportunities and challenges. The objective of this paper is to provide some empirical results based on survey of 45 Central Asian universities. The survey reveals changes in different dimensions of higher education: from business competences of students, their level of internationalization, average salaries and research motivation of Faculty members till the estimated level of corruption by the representatives of higher education institutions of Central Asia. The representatives of the top and middle management of these institutions from different regions of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan were surveyed in 2010. The survey results showed some new and unexpected trends, particularly for Turkmenistan which is still considered as a “closed economy”, and Kazakhstan that is generally perceived as the most developed country in higher education. JEL codes: A10, A20, I21 Keywords: Higher education, Central Asia, Students´ skills, Research Motivation, Corruption „This paper was presented at the 10th Biennial Conference of the Australasian Association for Communist and Post-Communist Studies (AACaPS) in Canberra, 3-4 February 2011. It has been peer reviewed via a double referee process and appears on the Conference Proceedings Website by the permission of the author who retains copyright‟