The Moderating Effect of Situational Control of Performance Variance on the Relationship Between Individual Differences and Performance (original) (raw)
Related papers
Maximal and typical measures of job performance: An analysis of performance variability over time
a framework for distinguishing between maximal and typical performance in the everyday work setting, develop a measure of maximal performance that utilizes on-the-job performance, and examine the effects of individual differences on the maximal-typical performance relationship. Analyses revealed that high high-ability employees and inexperienced employees were characterized by a lower maximal-typical correlation and more motivationally-relevant variability in performance than their counterparts. There is some evidence of differential validity for maximal versus typical performance. Implications for job performance theory and human resource practice are discussed. . In general, maximum performance is conceived as the level of performance an individual can achieve when highly motivated ("can do"), typical performance as the level of performance an individual usually achieves over a period of time ("will do"), and the difference between these two measures is believed to be a function of motivation level . Note that this distinction focuses on individual performance variation and attributes the variation to individual (person) factors. argue that the maximum-typical distinction reveals information about the relative importance of ability and motivation as determinants of performance. If measurement error and situational constraints are controlled, Sackett et al. contend that the correlation between maximum and typical performance measures reflects the variance attributable to ability and the residual variance can thus be attributed to motivation.
Progress and problems in the measurement of individual differences in on-the-job performance
Acta Psychologica, 1963
Recent progress and present problems in the measurement of individual differences in on-the-job performance are considered. Job performance appraisal techniques discussed are production records, interviews and questionnaires, work sample and situational tests, appraisal of executive performance, and rating scales. Analytic techniques reviewed are intercorrelation and factor analy,fis, scaling, and reliability, including job performance changes over .~ime. Important current issues are associated with the dimensionality of performance criteria, their selection and evaluation, their predictability, their ultimacy, and • e role ef environmental factors. It is concluded that there is a need for an inte~ating conceptual framework to order and organize the field and to provide a more satisfactory basis for evaluating individual differences in onthe-job performance.
Perspectives on Models of Job Performance
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2000
Contemporary models of job performance are reviewed. Links between task performance, contextual performance, organizational citizenship behaviors, counterproductivity and organizational deviance are pointed out. Measurement issues in constructing generic models applicable across jobs are discussed. Implications for human resource management in general, and performance appraisal for selection and assessment in particular, are explored. It is pointed out that the different dimensions or facets of individual job performance hypothesized in the literature are positively correlated. This positive manifold suggests the presence of a general factor which represents a common variance shared across all the dimensions or facets. Although no consensus exists in the extant literature on the meaning and source of this shared variance (i.e., the general factor), rater idiosyncratic halo alone does not explain this general factor. Future research should explain the common individual differences determinants of performance dimensions.
Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance
Objective: Individual work performance is differently conceptualized and operationalized in different disciplines. The aim of the current review was twofold: (1) identifying conceptual frameworks of individual work performance and (2) integrating these to reach a heuristic conceptual framework. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in medical, psychological, and management databases. Studies were selected independently by two researchers and included when they presented a conceptual framework of individual work performance. Results: A total of 17 generic frameworks (applying across occupations) and 18 job-specific frameworks (applying to specific occupations) were identified. Dimensions frequently used to describe individual work performance were task performance, contextual performance, counterproductive work behavior, and adaptive performance. Conclusion: On the basis of the literature, a heuristic conceptual framework of individual work performance was proposed. This framework can serve as a theoretical basis for future research and practice.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2015
According to career construction theory, continuous adaptation to the work environment is crucial to achieve work and career success. In this study, we examined the relative importance of career adaptability for job performance ratings using an experimental policy-capturing design. Employees (N = 135) from different vocational backgrounds rated the overall job performance of fictitious employees in 40 scenarios based on information about their career adaptability, mental ability, conscientiousness, and job complexity. We used multilevel modeling to investigate the relative importance of each factor. Consistent with expectations, career adaptability positively predicted job performance ratings, and this effect was relatively smaller than the effects of conscientiousness and mental ability. Job complexity did not moderate the effect of career adaptability on job performance ratings, suggesting that career adaptability predicts job performance ratings in high-, medium-, and low-complexity jobs. Consistent with previous research, the effect of mental ability on job performance ratings was stronger in high-compared to low-complexity jobs. Overall, our findings provide initial evidence for the predictive validity of employees' career adaptability with regard to other people's ratings of job performance.
2014
Research into the dynamicity of job performance criteria has found evidence suggesting the presence of rank-order changes to job performance scores across time as well as intraindividual trajectories in job performance scores across time. These findings have influenced a large body of research into (a) the dynamicity of validities of individual differences predictors of job performance and (b) the relationship between individual differences predictors of job performance and intraindividual trajectories of job performance. In the present dissertation, I addressed these issues within the context of the Five Factor Model of personality. The Five Factor Model is arranged hierarchically, with five broad higher-order factors subsuming a number of more narrowly tailored personality facets. Research has debated the relative merits of broad versus narrow traits for predicting job performance, but the entire body of research has addressed the issue from a static perspective --by examining the relative magnitude of validities of global factors versus their facets. While research along these lines has been enlightening, theoretical perspectives suggest that the validities of global factors versus their facets v may differ in their stability across time. Thus, research is needed to not only compare the relative magnitude of validities of global factors versus their facets at a single point in time, but also to compare the relative stability of validities of global factors versus their facets across time. Also necessary to advance cumulative knowledge concerning intraindividual performance trajectories is research into broad vs. narrow traits for predicting such trajectories. In the present dissertation, I addressed these issues using a four-year longitudinal design. The results indicated that the validities of global conscientiousness were stable across time, while the validities of conscientiousness facets were more likely to fluctuate. However, the validities of emotional stability and extraversion facets were no more likely to fluctuate across time than those of the factors.
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2004
This study examined the contributions of the 5-Factor Model (FFM; P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1992) and RIASEC (J. L. Holland, 1994) constructs of consistency, differentiation, and person-environment congruence in predicting job performance ratings in a large sample (N ϭ 514) of employees. Hierarchical regression analyses conducted separately by gender indicated that the interaction of differentiation with Agreeableness and Conscientiousness explained statistically significant variance in work performance for men, and that the interaction of congruence with Agreeableness, Artistic, and Social subscales was statistically significantly related to work performance in women. Findings suggested that the most successful model of job performance prediction would be substantially more complex than simple RIASEC or FFM approaches, and would likely incorporate interactions with constructs of worker adjustment, person-environment fit, types of work environments, and gender.
Impact of individual differences on employee affective responses to task characteristics
Journal of Business Research, 2012
Numerous studies have considered the relationships between task ! dimensions and employee affective responses. However, the results of these investigations generally have been inconclusive (see [S] ) and have led to a more recent focus on the need to consider moderators of task dimension-satisfaction relationships. While a number of studies have examined the impact of moderator variables, the results remain unclear 10,11,.
Incremental Validity of Situational Judgment Tests for Task and Contextual Job Performance
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2007
This paper has three goals. First, it responds to calls for additional research on subgroup differences in situational judgment tests. Second, it expands the cumulative knowledge on the incremental validity of situational judgment tests beyond cognitive ability and personality. Third, it examines the validity and incremental validity of various predictors for both task and contextual performance.