A Cannibal’s Sermon: Hannibal Lecter, Sympathetic Villainy and Moral Revaluation (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Battle For Moral Supremacy in There Will Be Blood and Unforgiven
This article examines the ways in which villainous characters are portrayed in post-classical American films, and examines how these characters are viewed by the cinematic audience in order to ascertain the degree to which the socially and morally understood roles or heroism and villainy might be inverted through cinematic representation. The potential for the inversion of perceived good and evil in the characters that inhabit the films discussed is considered in relation to the aligning and allying capacity of cinema. Through considering the formal presentation of characters and scenarios, this work suggests that villainous deeds can be perceived as unthreatening, and even 'moral' to an extent. The purpose of this article is to form an understanding of how audiences engage with iniquitous characters, and to consider the potential spectatorial implications of such a bond.
The process of spectator’s engagement with the character is one of the most multidimensional studies in film theory. In his study on the character engagement, Murray Smith states that: ‘Characters are salient elements of narrative structure, but we should never lose sight of the fact that characters are, nevertheless, parts of larger structures’. (Smith, 1995, 74) By using the example of We Need to Talk About Kevin, an adaptation of Lionel Shriver’s (2003) famous homonymous novel, this essay will closely study the phenomenon of perverse allegiance through the prism of the ‘structure of sympathy’ theory, and discuss, to what extent perverse allegiance can be regarded as an aspect of character engagement and ‘identification’.
Moral Emotions, Antiheroes and the Limits of Allegiance (2016)
Emotions in Contemporary TV Series, edited by Alberto N. García, Basingstoke, Palgrave McMillan, pp. 52-70., 2016
According to its creator, Vince Gilligan, Breaking Bad (AMC, 2008–13) describes the moral corruption of a normal man, the conversion of Mr. Chips to Scarface. In ‘Full Measures’ (3.13), the moral and emotional complexity of the story is encapsulated in a seemingly incidental scene. We see Walter White in his living room, giving little Holly a bottle of milk. A close- up shows how the baby grabs at his glasses, and in this moment of paternal tenderness, the writers cunningly re-humanize a character who just executed two thugs and minutes later ordered the death of his lab partner, as if to remind us that, at heart, ‘he’s really just a family man’ forced by circumstances to take matters into his own hands. This important step in the metamorphosis of Walter is again mitigated by several factors: children, the family and everyday domestic life. Self-defence is, of course, the justification for these deaths, but the devotion of a father towards his little baby also enter into the moral and emotional equation that characterises Breaking Bad. This article will be structured according to four sections: first, we will examine the rise of antiheroes over the past decade, exploring the ideological, industrial and narrative reasons that explain their success. Secondly, we will address how spectators engage morally and emotionally with the moving image, paying special attention to the specific nature of TV narrative. Thirdly, we will analyse the four main dramatic strategies that strengthen our identification with these morally conflicted characters: moral comparatism , the soothing power of family, acts of contrition and victimization. Lastly, we will propose a discussion over the ‘levels of engagement’ described by Smith and expanded by Vaage for television, in order to explore what the limits of sympathetic allegiance are, and how both the spectator and the narrative need to recover it cyclically.
Film-Philosophy, 2017
The long-form television drama series Hannibal (Fuller 2013–2015) thematises the embodied imagination and the elicitation of empathy and ethical understanding at the level of narrative and characterisation as well as through character engagement and screen aesthetics. Using Hannibal as a case study, this research investigates how stylistic choices frame the experiences of screen characters and engender forms of intersubjectivity based on corporeal and cognitive routes to empathy; in particular, it examines the capacity for screen media to facilitate what neuroscientist Vittorio Gallese terms intercorporeality. As a constitutive aspect of intersubjectivity and social understanding that works through embodied simulation, intercorporeality invites a reconceptualisation of empathy and its association with ethical motivation and insight. Hannibal also introduces cannibalism as a dark metaphor for the incorporation of another into oneself, reflecting on empathy's ill-understood potential for negative affect and unethical consequences.
"Problems, Puzzles, and Paradoxes for a Moral Psychology of Fiction"
Problems, Puzzles, and Paradoxes for a Moral Psychology of Fiction By Katherine Tullmann Adviser: Dr. Jesse Prinz The goal of my dissertation is to provide a comprehensive account of our psychological engagements with fiction. While many aestheticians have written on issues concerning art and ethics, only a few have addressed the ways in which works of fiction offer problems for general accounts of morality, let alone how we go about making moral judgments about fictions in the first place. My dissertation fills that gap. I argue that the first challenge in explaining our interactions with fiction arises from functional and inferential arguments that entail that our mental states about fictional entities are non-genuine. This means that our mental states during our engagements with fiction are different in kind from typical beliefs, emotions, desires, etc. that we have in real-life contexts. I call this position the Distinct Attitude View (DAV). In its place, I propose a common-sense, standard attitude view (SAV): the idea that our psychological interactions with non-real entities can be explained in terms of the intentional content of those states as opposed to a distinct type of mental state. In expanding the SAV, I develop several independent accounts of social cognition, emotions, and moral judgments. I also show how the SAV can dissolve standard problems in the philosophy and psychology of aesthetic experience: the paradox of fiction, the problem of imaginative existence, and the sympathy for the devil phenomenon, amongst others.
Full text: Sympathy with the Devil or Playing with Empathy (Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press)
Within the theatre, villainy has always held much appeal for both authors and audiences. Villainy plays an important role in my theatrical work in which I use my writings not so much to judge the 'Bad' but to try and understand it, explain its motivations and the contextual base. Hoping to establish a wrong empathy that leads to moral reflections by the audiences, I created plays based on Gilles de Rais (who murdered hundreds of children and therefore served as the basis for the Bluebeard fairy tale) and on Pope Rodrigo Borgia (who changed the face of Renaissance through rape and murder). These plays are based on thorough historical research, based on texts such as the Secret Archives of the Vatican. Since emotions, virtues and actions are embedded in a context and held together through the eye of the beholder, authors are challenged to create narratives that close the gap between monstrosities and morality. Empathy acts as a tool whereby audiences not only reflect upon villainy, but may also identify in such a way that gruesome actions are considered essential and therefore inevitable. The theatre is – in my opinion – a well-suited medium for the unique rapport between empathic audiences, narratives and ethics. I came to the conclusion that playwrights must develop empathy with the villain to enable the writing of their dialogue. In this sense, they act as doublure of the character and as the devil's advocate. This process of becoming and sharing the villainy is one of constant balance between the moral goal of the character and that of the author. This is in order to achieve empathic performances that in their own turn, lead to reflections on empathy and morality by the audiences. Empathy becomes an active stream between narrative, audience and reflection. The characters lure audiences into narratives through the use of empathy. Theatre is unique in its concrete encounter between artists and audience. As Brook wrote: 'A man walks across [this empty space] whilst someone else is watching him, and this is all that is needed for an act of theatre to be engaged.' 1 This close proximity is one of the appeals of theatre, but at the same time it forms a major challenge because the empathic effects and affects are instantly tangible. Empathy and theatre seem inseparable because audience and performer, narrative and staging all engage reciprocally in an empathic whirl.
A Structure of Antipathy: Constructing the Villain in Narrative Film
Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind, 2018
Many narrative films feature villains, major characters that audiences are meant to condemn. This article investigates the cognitive-affective underpinnings of audience antipathy in order to shed light on how filmic villainy is constructed. To that end, the article introduces an analytical framework at the intersection of cognitive film theory and moral psychology. The framework analyzes villainy into three categories: guilty intentionality, consequential action, and causal responsibility.