Journal of Economic and Social Policy Economic Gardening: Capacity Building for Stronger Regions Recommended Citation Economic Gardening: Capacity Building for Stronger Regions (original) (raw)
Related papers
Economic Gardening: A Case Study in Endogenous Development
2016
Endogenous development; economic gardening; regional development; manufacturing; SME capacity building. While knowledge and technology have created global markets, economic stimulation on the local level is increasingly recognised as the key to regional resilience. As such, regional capacity building initiatives have moved into endogenous development models that build on the local economic context, embedded competencies and social structures. Illustrating an endogenous regional development initiative, this paper discusses a recent program in regional Victoria based on ‘economic gardening’ principles of infrastructure, information and connections and tailored to the specific needs of small to medium enterprises with high growth potential. The program brought together three tiers of government and the regional university to increase innovative capacity and performance of manufacturers in the region. The paper discusses program design and recruitment and reports both
This work has been produced by the National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) on behalf of the Australian Government and state territory governments, with funding provided through the Australian Department of Education, Science and Training. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process without the written permission. Requests should be made in writing to NCVER. Contents Contents 2 Regional opportunities and impediments 4 Regional growth values for all regions 7 Regional growth driver values for all regions 10 Theories and concepts 13 Structural agglomeration 13 The regional innovation system 15 Learning and knowledge 15 Institutional thickness 18 Organisation power and control, and enterprise segmentation 20 Social capital and regional organisation 21 Method 23 Table 2 Regional growth values for all regions No Region UER84 UER84W UER02 UER02W
Regional Development: Some issues for policy makers
2000
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public.
Regional development: The importance of a relationship with Government
This paper examines the role of Economic Development Officers (EDOs) in implementing policies aimed at assisting businesses to grow as a strategy of regional growth. policy framework (principles, policy lines, measures and practices) is used to examine the issues with implementation.
I am part of a small collective that is promoting an alternative socioeconomic approach to the society-economy-environment nexus in "post-industrial" Greater Manchester, England. I will describe the approach we have taken which is to promote alternative thinking via publication, networking, and working in alliances with actors from a variety of sectors. I will reflect on what we have learned from our successes and failures, emphasising the importance of identifying issues that both engage people and are open to a degrowth orientation (e.g. income and wealth distribution, finance and investment, alternative exchange systems, sustainable and affordable food), and the value of framing the degrowth alternative positively, both in its concepts (the Viable Economy) and its goals (e.g. economic and social security). The ecological concept of edges and ideas from critical community psychology (my own academic discipline) will inform the contribution.
This paper proposes that a virtuous circle for the sustainable development of a city or region is achieved through a process whereby proactive and strong leadership and effective institutions enhance the capacity and capability of a place to better use its resource endowments and gain an improved market fit in becoming competitive and being entrepreneurial. It is proposed that the performance of a city or region at a point in time and the path of its economic development over time may be represented by its position in a Regional Competitiveness Performance Cube. The paper proposes a new model framework whereby a city or region's economic development and performance is an outcome dependent on how its resource endowments and market fit as quasi-independent variables are mediated by the interaction between leadership, institutions, and entrepreneurship as intervening variables. The experiences of a number of case study cities from a variety of settings in the US, Europe, Asia and Australia are explored within that framework.