Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study (original) (raw)
Related papers
International Journal of Cardiology, 2006
In patients with severe heart failure, sinus rhythm and wide QRS complex biventricular (BiV) pacing leads to clinical and haemodynamic improvement, but the immediate reversibility of these changes is not known. We assessed the acute and medium-term (3-month) haemodynamic effects of BiV pacing and of switching to other pacing modalities in 21 patients with severe heart failure, sinus rhythm and QRS>or=130 ms. Haemodynamic studies were performed: 1) at the time of implantation of a BiV pacing device, during AAI pacing, atrial synchronous right ventricular (RV) pacing, atrial synchronous left ventricular (LV) pacing and atrial synchronous BiV pacing (all at 100 bpm); 2) after 3 months of continuous BiV pacing--with evaluations being made by switching to RV and the other pacing modalities. At both the acute and medium-term evaluations, BiV pacing provided the greatest improvement in cardiac index. Switching from BiV to RV pacing led to a more marked decrease in the cardiac index at 3 months. No strict correlation was evident between acute and medium-term effects of BiV pacing on cardiac index. Cardiac resynchronization by BiV pacing provides acute/medium-term improvements in cardiac index. Sudden, medium-term failure of LV stimulation can lead to an even more pronounced haemodynamic derangement than that inducible by RV pacing at baseline. Acute haemodynamic evaluations do not seem to provide a powerful way for identifying medium-term responders.
Arquivos Brasileiros De Cardiologia, 2002
Received for publication on Accepted on Purpose -To analyze the influence of biventricular pacing (BP) on clinical behavior, ventricular arrhythmia (VA) prevalence, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) by gated ventriculography. Methods -Twenty-four patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and NYHA class III and IV underwent pacemaker implantation and were randomized either to the conventional or BP group, all receiving BP after 6 months. Results -Sixteen patients were in NYHA class IV (66.6%) and 8 were in class III (33.4%). After 1-year followup, 14 patients were in class II (70%) and 5 were in class III (25%). Two sudden cardiac deaths occurred. A significant reduction in QRS length was found with BP (p=0.006). A significant statistical increase, from a mean of 19.13 ± 5.19% (at baseline) to 25.33 ± 5.90% (with BP) was observed in LVEF Premature ventricular contraction prevalence decreased from a mean of 10,670.00 ± 12,595.39 SD or to a mean of 3,007.00 ± 3,216.63 SD PVC/24 h with BP (p<0.05). Regarding the hospital admission rate over 1 year, we observed a significant reduction from 60. To 16 admissions with BP (p<0.05). Conclusion -Patients with LBBB and severe heart failure experienced, with BP, a significant NYHA class and LVEF improvement. A reduction in the hospital admission rate and VA prevalence also occurred.
The American journal of …, 2003
To assess the impact of biventricular pacing on quality of life over 12 months of follow-up, 76 patients in the MUSTIC trial were evaluated by 2 instruments: The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Karolinska Quality of Life Questionnaire. MUSTIC is a randomized, controlled study to evaluate the effects of biventricular pacing in patients in New York Heart Association class III heart failure with intraventricular conduction delay. Following a single, blind, crossover comparison of 3 months of biventricular pacing to inactive pacing (sinus rhythm group) or ventricular-inhibited pacing (atrial fibrillation group), 85% of patients preferred and were programmed to biventricular pacing and were followed for 12 months. In parallel with clinical improvements, substantial benefits in quality of life for most broad domains of quality of life and cardiovascular symptoms were found during biventricular pacing already within the crossover phase with a maintained benefit over the 12-month follow-up. Biventricular pacing improved quality of life in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delays. The benefits were sustained over 12 months of follow-up. ᮊ2003 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
A pilot experience with permanent biventricular pacing to treat advanced heart failure
American Heart Journal, 2000
at least it cannot correct the marked asynchrony of ventricular activation, contraction, and relaxation, which characterizes a number of patients with chronic left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Such is the case in particular in patients with intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD). Biventricular pacing (BVP), which simultaneously activates both ventricles, may contribute to correcting the asynchrony and thus improve cardiac performance. Several acute hemodynamic studies have shown that temporary biventricular pacing significantly improved hemodynamics. The aim of this prospective pilot but uncontrolled study was to assess the long-term clinical effects of permanent BVP in patients with drug-refractory heart failure secondary to advanced LV systolic dysfunction and IVCD.
Conventional Versus Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure and Bradyarrhythmia: The COMBAT Study
Journal of Cardiac Failure, 2010
Background: Worsening in clinical and cardiac status has been noted after chronic right ventricular pacing, but it is uncertain whether atriobiventricular (BiVP) is preferable to atrio-right ventricular pacing (RVP). Conventional versus Multisite Pacing for BradyArrhythmia Therapy study (COMBAT) sought to compare BiVP versus RVP in patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) and atrioventricular (AV) block. Methods and Results: COMBAT is a prospective multicenter randomized double blind crossover study. Patients with New York Heart Association functional class (FC) II-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) !40%, and AV block as an indication for pacing were enrolled. All patients underwent biventricular system implantation and then were randomized to receive successively (group A) RVP-BiVP-RVP, or (group B) BiVP-RVP-BiVP. At the end of each 3-month crossover period, patients were evaluated according to Quality of Life (QoL), FC, echocardiographic parameters, 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and peak oxygen consumption (VO 2max ). Sixty patients were enrolled, and the mean follow-up period was 17.5 6 10.7 months. There were significant improvements in QoL, FC, LVEF, and left ventricular end-systolic volume with BiVP compared with RVP. The effects of pacing mode on 6MWT and VO 2max were not significantly different. Death occurred more frequently with RVP. Conclusion: In patients with systolic HF and AV block requiring permanent ventricular pacing, BiVP is superior to RVP and should be considered the preferred pacing mode. (J Cardiac Fail 2010;16:293e300)
Echocardiography, 2007
Background: Although left ventricular (LV) pacing has been proposed as an alternative to biventricular (BIV) pacing for heart failure (HF) patients, few comparative data are available on the electromechanical effects of these pacing modalities at mid-term follow-up. Aim: To investigate the clinical and echocardiographic effects of LV versus BIV pacing in a mid-term randomized study. Methods: After implantation of a device with LV/BIV pacing capabilities, 22 patients with chronic HF and left bundle branch block were randomized to LV or BIV pacing. Patients were assessed both preimplantation and after 3 months by clinical examination, ECG and echocardiography with pulsed tissue Doppler imaging. Results: At 3 months LV pacing improved clinical parameters, LV ejection fraction (+5%, range 5-8%, P = 0.007) and intraventricular dyssynchrony (−40 ms, range −50 to −15 ms, in septal to lateral delay, P = 0.008) to a similar extent to BIV pacing. A decrease in interventricular mechanical delay (−25 ms, range −40 to −5 ms, P = 0.008) and QRS duration (−28 ms, range −40 to −5 ms, P = 0.008) was observed in BIV, but not in LV patients. Conclusion: In this pilot evaluation, LV pacing appeared to be associated with clinical benefits similar to BIV pacing at mid-term follow-up, and this was combined with an improvement in intraventricular dyssynchrony, regardless of variations in interventricular dyssynchrony and QRS duration. Echocardiographic evaluation of intraventricular dyssynchrony seems to be an appropriate method for assessing the chronic response to LV pacing. (ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Volume 25, February 2008) cardiac pacing, Doppler tissue imaging, heart failure Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve symptoms, exercise capacity, quality of life, and survival in patients with severe drug-refractory heart failure and left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. 1-3 These benefits are mainly related to an improvement in ventricular synchronicity, leading to improved cardiac function. 4 LV pacing alone
Biventricular pacing in paced patients with normal hearts
Europace, 2009
Right ventricular apical (RVA) stimulation, although beneficial in the treatment of symptomatic bradycardia, has proven detrimental in a substantial percentage of pacemaker recipients, leading to iatrogenic deterioration of left ventricular structure and function. Alternative right ventricular pacing sites appeared advantageous but their superiority has not been proven. Biventricular stimulation is effective in reducing ventricular dyssynchrony in subgroups of heart failure patients, improving their functional capacity, morbidity, and mortality. Therefore, it seems logical that this pacing strategy, by eliminating ventricular dyssynchrony, could play an important role in preventing the deleterious effects of chronic RVA stimulation in patients with normal hearts who undergo cardiac pacing for bradycardia indications. Preliminary investigations have yielded encouraging results, but further studies with harder endpoints such as quality of life, morbidity, and mortality are necessary to clarify the potentially advantageous effect of biventricular stimulation in paced patients with normal hearts.
… England Journal of …, 2001
Nine patients were withdrawn from the study before randomization, and 10 failed to complete both study periods. Thus, 48 patients completed both phases of the study. The mean (±SD) distance walked in six minutes was 23 percent greater with active pacing (399±100 m vs. 326±134 m, P<0.001), the qualityof-life score improved by 32 percent (P<0.001), peak oxygen uptake increased by 8 percent (P<0.03), hospitalizations were decreased by two thirds (P<0.05), and active pacing was preferred by 85 percent of the patients (P<0.001).