Defining and Assessing Local Human Development in Romania (2016) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Local Human Development of Rural Places in Romania: A Community Capitals Framework
Romanian Journal of Population Studies, XVI, 1, 2022
The article aims to understand human development at the level of the communes in Romania. The context of development is given by the community capitals associated with the population, the urban region, the cultural area, the natural environment, and the historical conditioning of development. The main dependent variable is measured both quantitatively by the local human development index and qualitatively by a typology of local development. The results of multiple regression analyses that have operated with both types of measurements of the dependent variable are complementary and contribute to the validation of the research and the generation of new hypotheses or research questions.
The paper laid the foundation of measuring the degree of development or poverty for all the villages of Romania. This is part of a larger project of building a social atlas of Romania, coming from a well structured Romanian social science tradition. The theoretical background of the measurement is the theory of capitals. Each village is considered as a combination of human, material, vital, symbolic and regional capital. Community development is considered as a latent continuous variable having maximum development and poverty as two poles. This latent variable is measured by a factor score index of 17 indicators. The index allows for measurement of village poverty in national and in regional hierarchies. Human capital is the most important component of village development or poverty. An explanation of village poverty is given in terms of poverty cycles and regression models. The poorest villages are peripheral villages within communes, located in plain areas, far from large cities and modernized roads, in low developed judets. Romania's villages are classified from a level and from a structural point of view.
The Atlas of Rural Marginalized Areas and of Local Human Development in Romania, WB, 2016
The Romanian version of the Atlas is available at : https://goo.gl/3voF3f . The mapped data sets at the village level are not yet available on internet. Hope to having them published in the near future. The data set on local human development for the upper territorial level ( communes and cities) are available at https://goo.gl/TGlccu for excel format , and for sav format at https://goo.gl/KXxhEA .
Analysis of local development in Romanian and Hungarian villages
2019
Over the last decade we have been conducting research activities in many village research camps and accumulating knowledge about the development of different villages. There is a gradually strengthening assumption that the development possibilities in the analysed villages will be affected significantly by the condition of the local society. In the study, we primarily focused on the experiences gained in the Romanian and Hungarian village research camps, where we were studing the local society and the history of development of thevillages. The main question was whether their development was determined by strategy, good luck and good position, or by the quality of the local society. Thefollowing methods were used during the research: processing and analysis of data available at the site and in databases, questionnaire surveys, interviews and participant observations. In case of statistical data, we relied primarily on the applications of the National Spatial Development and Territori...
The paper is devoted to a comparative analysis of two scales for measuring poverty at village level. The discussion is focused on the grid for poverty measurement in the practice of Romanian Social Development Fund to target poverty alleviation. The analysis points out the fact that, in the last three years the grid functioned effectively to identify poor villages and implicitly to implement of poverty alleviation at community level. The kind of poverty targeted by the grid is particularly associated with distance items (village location versus commune center, versus nearest town, modernized roads, county chef-lieu etc.). The study assesses the grid from the point of view of measuring village poverty in different geographical areas. Comparing grid measurement of village poverty with another measure based on estimations of different types of capital (human, social, material, vital, cultural) results that the RSDF tool is has a rather poor ability to cope with difference in poverty associated with mountain-plain differences. The final part of the paper makes clear the relations among household poverty, rural community poverty and physical environment. The causal profile for different types of consumptions at the household level are showed to be significantly different and with consequences for development policies.
Journal of Community Positive Practices, 2020
The project begins from the coordinates provided by the sociological literature which show that local underdevelopment is the result of structural factors as lack of employment and the predominance of employment in (subsistence) agriculture, lack of infrastructure (access to public utilities such as gas, drinking water or paved roads) but also the distance to the nearest city that could be a pole of development or human capital (the education stock of the local population) and it tries to refine the analysis by overlapping the typology looking at local contexts and by deciphering the factors and mechanisms of underdevelopment at local level. The proposed approach has an
ROMANIA'S YOUNGEST TOWNS – HOW URBAN ARE THEY
– Romania's Youngest Towns – How Urban Are They? After the collapse of the socialist regime, the urban system of Romania has changed significantly in a very short period of time: in a few years 60 rural settlements gained the town status, mostly without matching the quantitative and qualitative conditions set by the law. This paper examines those 17 indicators necessary to become a town, and compares the values of 2004 (the year, when a " mass declaration " was conducted which resulted in 38 new towns) with the values of 2014 (the latest available statistical data) in order to see the extent and direction in which the new towns developed (or not) in ten years after becoming urban. The paper discusses also the question of whether urbanization and development can be made via political decisions or not.
MAPPING DEPRIVATION IN RURAL AREAS FROM TRANSYLVANIA: REFLECTIONS ON A METHODOLOGICAL EXERCISE
The aim of the present paper is to present and critically discuss the potentialities and limits of using official data (collected and reported by state-institutions) in order to shed light on consequences of uneven development and measure area deprivation in present-day Romania. Our argumentation is based on a quantitative inquiry at the level of rural communes and small-towns from three counties located in the historical region of Transylvania. It presents the reasons for choosing certain statistical indicators, the construction of composite indexes and the profiles of localities according to their values. We explore the statistical correlations between our indexes and the poverty rates measured for 2002 (CASPIS, 2004), as well as the Local Human Development Index proposed by Sandu (2011) and revised by the World Bank (2014). Unlike other poverty-mapping inquiries, our goal was not to identify compact, segregated and severely impoverished settlements, but to measure the extent of material deprivation at the level of the entire administrative unit. In this way, we refrained from seeing poverty as the problem of a socially (and sometimes spatially) marginalized settlement, and instead defined poverty as a problem of the entire local community, that should be addressed by the local community as a whole. Our data reveals that, after controlling for poverty and local resources, the share of the Roma ethnic minority is a strong statistical predictor of registered unemployment, however, it does not correlate with the frequency of granting social assistance benefits. Introduction 4 The aim of the present paper is to present and critically discuss the potentialities and limits of using official data (collected and reported by state-institutions) in order to shed light on unequal development and measure area deprivation in present-day Romania. We present the reasons for choosing certain statistical indicators that local authorities regularly (yet not publicly) report at the level of localities, the construction of composite indexes based on these indicators and the profiles of rural communes (administrative unites comprising one or several villages) and small-towns (with less than 20,000 inhabitants) according to these indexes 5. Unlike other poverty-mapping inquiries, our goal was not to identify compact, segregated and severely impoverished settlements (Sandu, 2005; Fleck and Rughiniș, 2008; Vincze, 2013; Vincze and Hossu, 2014), but to measure the extent of material deprivation at the level of the administrative unit as a whole. In this way, we refrained from seeing poverty as the problem of a socially (and sometimes spatially) marginalized settlement, and instead defined poverty as a problem of the entire local community, that should be addressed by the local community as a whole. Our argumentation is based on a quantitative inquiry at the level of rural communes and small-towns from three counties from Transylvania, situated in the central part of Romania and partly corresponding to the historical region of Szeklerland (Székelyföld in Hungarian and Ținutul Secuiesc in Romanian): Mureș (Maros), Harghita (Hargita) and Covasna (Kovászna). Although in terms of ethnic distribution these three counties have a specific profile, with considerably larger shares of the Hungarian population 6 , in terms of economic and labour force indicators they largely resemble the central-region of the country and Romania