Juror decision making, attitudes, and the hindsight bias (original) (raw)
Related papers
Communication Law Review, 2008
Juror decision making: The importance of evidence
Law and Human Behavior, 1987
Bias in Jurors vs Bias in Juries: New Evidence from the SDS Perspective
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999
Effects of psycholegal-knowledge on decision-making by mock juries
Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2005
Jurors' Expectations and Decision-Making: Revisiting the CSI Effect
British Psychology Society: North of England Bulletin, 2020
Jury Decision Making: Implications For and From Psychology
Belief Revision as Applied within a Descriptive Model of Jury Deliberations
The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence
Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000
Juror Need for Cognition and Sensitivity to Methodological Flaws in Expert Evidence1
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2008
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2021
ILR Impact Brief - Evidence, Police Credibility, and Race Affect Juror First Votes
2006
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2008
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2019
Testing the Impact of Criminal Jury Instructions on Verdicts: A Conceptual Replication
Michael D. Cicchini, Lawrence T White
Columbia Law Review Online, 2017
Juror motivations: applying procedural justice theory to juror decision making
Psychology, Crime & Law
Social cognitive processes explain bias in juror decisions
2021
Judging Bias: Juror Confidence and Judicial Rulings on Challenges for Cause
Law & Society Review, 2008
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2008
Ask and What Shall Ye Receive? A Guide for Using and Interpreting What Jurors Tell Us
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, 2011
Law Hum Behav, 1987
Social Inference Processes In Juror Judgments of Multiple-Offense Trials
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984
An examination of the influence of surprise on judges and jurors’ outcome effects
Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2008
The promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation
Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2010
Rate Expectations: Jurors and the Self-Reinforcing Effect of Conviction Rates
Criminal Law Forum
Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibility
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1979
Juror Judgments about Liability and Damages: Sources of Viriability and Ways to Increase Consistency
Depaul Law Review, 1998
Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis.
Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 1989
Double Discounting: The Effects of Comparative Negligence on Mock Juror Decision Making
Law and Human Behavior, 1999
Judges Versus Jurors: Biased Attributions
2020
Finishing Strong: Recency Effects in Juror Judgments
Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2005
Cognitive Bias Affecting Decision-Making in the Legal Process
2021
Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research
Psychological Bulletin, 1977